Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Psychology of Information

@psyofinfo

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

157subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001171802483
TypeChannel
Username@psyofinfo
DescriptionCognitive science and how life is. www.psyofinfo.love
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/psyofinfo

Growth

1577 August 2026 — 157 subscribers8 August 2026 — 157 subscribers7 August 20268 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 156–158 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 18:15157no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:24157first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 20 January 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
300
Videos
8
Links
553

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
52s
Average length
52s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

87 reactions across 13 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3540.2%
🔥2528.7%
👍1011.5%
66.90%
🕊55.75%
🍾33.45%
💔22.30%
👏11.15%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 87reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 20 January 2024 to 4 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Jul 2026, 14:40 UTC91 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

GIPHY channel by Psychology of Information: https://giphy.com/channel/psyofinfo

6

18 Nov 2025, 13:46 UTC384 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Не навреди "Фактором, наиболее часто и существенно влияющим на состояние мозга здорового человека, являются эмоции. [...] Воспитанный баланс эмоций, разумная гордость и стойкость -- важнейшие условия для полной реализации таланта." -- Наталия Петровна Бехтерева (1924-2008), советский и российский нейрофизиолог, пионер нейронаук в России, научный руководитель Института Мозга Человека РАН.

👍6🔥2

8 Nov 2025, 07:49 UTC363 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

About 1/3 of global population suffers from a mental health condition — depression and anxiety being main ones WHO suggests that over a billion people live with mental health disorders worldwide (WHO, 2025) – a striking new statistics suggesting an urgent need for scale up of mental health services. McGrath et al. (2023) report that "The lifetime prevalence of any mental disorder was 28·6% for male respondents and

💔2🕊2

2 Oct 2025, 06:18 UTC319 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @orda_kzPhoto

Экипаж № 1. Казахстан запустил подготовку к полёту в космос В Нацкосмическом центре столицы запустили первый в республике эксперимент с изоляцией экипажа. Почти всё (кроме невесомости) как в настоящем полёте. Исследовательницы проведут 10 дней в наземном модуле с графиком, приближённым к полётному: когнитивные задачи, медицинские замеры и тренировочные нештатные ситуации. Молодые учёные параллельно изучат утечки те

🔥137👍1

20 Sept 2025, 12:04 UTC253 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Free floating concept, sentient state, semi-understood self-commentary and other concepts for understanding the mind by D. Dennett in "Kinds of Minds" As we advance in understanding the human mind through AI, concepts from the philosophy of mind are becoming increasingly valuable. One of the most prominent contemporary philosophers provides a compelling account of what constitutes the human mind, how it compares to

🕊31

15 Apr 2025, 13:52 UTC391 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

The Most Cited Papers of Twenty First Century Intriguing top three places: 1) AI 2) Genetics 3) Psychology

9🔥1

12 Apr 2025, 15:42 UTC429 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Mental Stability: The Skill of the Decade “Once, I was evaluating astronaut applicants” says psychiatrist Nick Kanas. “I asked them to give me some examples of things that might cause stress.” One applicant, a test pilot, recalled the time he was flying an experimental aircraft and it spun out of control. As the plane spiraled down, he took out his manual, calmly thumbed through it, and figured out how to pull the p

6👍1

1 Dec 2024, 15:22 UTC613 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Coming to peace with multitasking I usually purchase a book either because I am deeply drawn to reading that specific title or because I have an intense desire to grasp a subject for which the book is renowned fo. I start to read the book as fast as I buy one. But, since I rarely leave a book unfinished that means I have several ongoing reads. I tend to focus on one at a time, with occasional shifts to the next. W

🔥6👏1

19 Nov 2024, 04:50 UTC502 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Superalignment, a team dedicated to the Alignment problem in OpenAI The "Alignment problem" and "representation" are among the most common terms when it comes to advancing AI. Alignment means ensuring the machines share human goals, whereas identical representations of complex ideas, such as "peace", "justice", "freedom" and "identity" in both algorithmic and biological minds would allow machines to have the same un

3🍾1

8 Jul 2024, 13:13 UTC≈1,780 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Will be presenting 11th July (Thursday) at 10:00 GMT+5 at Google I/O Extended Central Asia! 🌐✔️ We will explore new brain-computer interfaces (BCI) and their exceptional features, look at the projects on social (emotional) features, ethical AI and overview AI Regulation. I will also share my deep interest in viewing AI as a complex mirror of the human psyche ⚖ Link to live stream: https://youtu.be/RphNgs9NzMs?t=95

5🔥3🍾2👍1

19 Mar 2024, 15:10 UTC714 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Move 37 It has been 8 years (9-15 March, 2016), since the Go game between Lee Sedol (top Go Player from South Korea) vs. AlphaGo by Google DeepMind. What is so special about Move 37? "Professional commentators almost unanimously agreed that not a single human player would choose that move. [...] AlphaGo [suggested] that there was one in 10,000 probability that Move 37 would have been played by a human player. So i

3

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @psyofinfo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Psychology of Information” (@psyofinfo), 157 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psyofinfo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.