Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Practicum School

@psyknowpro

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

271subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002406760399
TypeChannel
Username@psyknowpro
DescriptionДобро пожаловать на канал Эммы Агасарян для КБТ- и схема-терапевтов. Здесь мы говорим о процессах терапии, концептуализации, подходах и техниках на профессиональном языке. https://t.me/psyknow — канал не только для специалистов
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/psyknowpro

Growth

2672712696 Aug 2026, 02:33 — 267 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 20:58 — 271 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 23:33 — 271 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 02:336 Aug 2026, 23:33
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 266–272 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 23:33271no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:58271+4
6 Aug 2026, 02:33267first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
75.5%
avg views ÷ 271 subscribers
Avg views / post
205
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.78%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held16 (25 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total3,273
Reactions total222
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 23:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
24
Videos
3
Links
16

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

222 reactions across 16 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
14364.4%
🔥2913.1%
❤‍🔥2410.8%
😁114.95%
👍52.25%
💘52.25%
31.35%
🤯20.901%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 222reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 18:42 UTC49 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

2. Смотрим дальше. Поделитесь, какая потребность не удовлетворена у Ангуса? Какой режим мешает удовлетворению этой потребности? Как учитель Пол обращается с этой потребностью? У Ангуса есть разные схемы, но ярче всего видна схема эмоциональной депривации. У него не удовлетворена потребность в безопасной привязанности, в частности в эмоциональной сонастройке, эмпатии и понимании. Режим, в котором находится Ангус опре

2🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 18:08 UTC98 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

1. Ангус узнает, что на Рождество его не заберут домой, давайте посмотрим фрагмент и порассуждаем вместе: 🔹какая схема здесь может проявляться/формироваться? 🔹Какой режим мы видим во второй части видео и как он связан со схемой?

🔥43

5 Aug 2026, 18:07 UTC101 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Кино-интервизия: «Оставленные» Коллеги, сегодня предлагаю вам поэтапно разобрать фрагменты (их будет пять) из очень трогательного фильма «Оставленные», про историю подростка Ангуса Талли, которого не забирают на Рождество, и учителя Пола, который поневоле остается с ним рядом. В процессе обсуждения будут спойлеры Работать будем так: вы сначала смотрите фрагмент, размышляете для себя или отвечаете на вопросы в комме

6🔥3

4 Aug 2026, 14:14 UTC97 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Коллеги, всем добрый день! Есть еще места в группы супервизий, с 4 и 11 августа! ✨по вторникам в 16.00 ✨длительность и периодичность: раз в две недели, два часа ✨стоимость: 5 500 рублей с человека ✨запись минимум на 4 супервизии ✨обязательным условием участия является завершенная программа обучения по схема-терапии. Чтобы записаться, пожалуйста пишите в личные сообщения @Agasaryan_Emma

3🔥3

3 Aug 2026, 18:57 UTC138 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Это из презентации по семинару по схеме спутанности, который прошел в апреле, а здесь можно посмотреть кусочек из этого семинара Вот здесь как раз описание того, как схема спутности, может проявляться

9🔥8

3 Aug 2026, 18:44 UTC135 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥54

3 Aug 2026, 18:43 UTC137 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Voice message

Отвечаю на комментарии по «Кеше» в голосовых

❤‍🔥54🤯2

2 Aug 2026, 17:12 UTC252 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Добрый вечер, коллеги! Сегодня хочу рекомендовать сериал, который заменит парочку обучений психотерапии. Когда я его посмотрела больше всего жалела, что у него нет английской версии, чтобы показать Джеффу Конвею. Итак, "Кеша должен умереть". Потому что его смерть единственный путь для его женщин, чтобы разорвать отношения с ним. И это не потому что Кеша абьюзер и удерживает в отношениях насильно. Их держит схема сп

12🔥7

30 Jul 2026, 17:40 UTC335 views36 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Коллеги, предлагаю обсудить очень холиварную тему. Сколько клиентов в неделю может максимум вести терапевт? В исследовании J. Kim , L. Brookman-Frazee et al. 2018 называют цифру от 25 сессий в неделю как связанную с повышенными рисками выгорания. На практике многие терапевты ощущают повышенную нагрузку и при 20 сессиях в неделю, а для кого-то комфортны 35 и более сессий. Кроме индивидуальных различий я бы еще обра

25😁11

29 Jul 2026, 15:27 UTC300 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Дорогие коллеги, всем привет! Я с новостями об очном мероприятии. 8 августа я буду участвовать в КульТурСлете от DocPsyClub вместе с Яковом Кочетковым и Полиной Тур Мы вместе проведем интерактивную блиц-супервизию и поговорим о ситуациях, с которыми сталкивается практически каждый специалист: дроп-аутах, границах компетенций, случаях, когда кажется, что уже попробовали все возможное, о том, как понять, что пора зав

14👍5

28 Jul 2026, 19:21 UTC284 views26 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

У нас сегодня закончился цикл продвинутых семинаров про схемы и завершающим был семинар про схему эмоциональной депривации. Это схема про то «чего не было». С ней трудно работать, так как часто она остается незамеченной. А еще именно эта схема часто связана с дефицитом многих навыков: 🔹распознавания эмоций 🔹просить о поддержке 🔹ощущать поддержку Но на этом мы не заканчиваем. На канале сделаем разборы фрагментов из

18💘5🔥3

27 Jul 2026, 08:02 UTC364 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Коллеги, всем добрый день! Есть еще места в группы супервизий, с 4 и 11 августа! ✨по вторникам в 16.00 ✨длительность и периодичность: раз в две недели, два часа ✨стоимость: 5 500 рублей с человека ✨запись минимум на 4 супервизии ✨обязательным условием участия является завершенная программа обучения по схема-терапии. Чтобы записаться, пожалуйста пишите в личные сообщения @Agasaryan_Emma

93

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @psyknowpro. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 111,420 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Practicum School” (@psyknowpro), 271 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psyknowpro.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.