Channel
@psydynamic1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
457subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002486221660 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @psydynamic1 |
| Description | این کانال جهت به اشتراک گذاشتن کتابها، مقالات، فیلم و دیگر موضوعات مربوط به روانشناسی میباشد! جهت مشاوره و روان درمانی، به آیدی زیر پیام بزارید! @Psy1429 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/psydynamic1 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:04 | 457 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:47 | 457 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (26 July 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 964 |
| Reactions total | 4 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 19:04 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
4 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 50.0% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 50.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌱 میراثی فراتر از ژنها آنچه از ما به نسل بعد منتقل میشود، فقط ویژگیهای ژنتیکی نیست. الگوهای رفتاری، شیوه دلبستگی، نحوه مدیریت احساسات و حتی باورهایی که درباره خودمان و جهان داریم نیز به فرزندانمان منتقل میشوند. ذهن کودک مانند اسفنجی است که نهتنها کلمات ما، بلکه لحن صدا، واکنشهایمان در برابر استرس و حتی ناگفتههای ما را نیز جذب میکند. این موضوع نشان میدهد که زخمهای درماننشده ما، مانند خشم پنهان، احساس بیا…
نگاهی روانکاوانه به آسیب خودشیفتگی فروید در مقالهی «دربارهٔ خودشیفتگی» (1914) توضیح میدهد که انسان بخشی از سرمایهگذاری روانی خود را متوجه خویشتن میکند؛ این همان چیزی است که او «لیبیدوی خودشیفته» مینامد. خودشیفتگی، در آغاز زندگی، مرحلهای طبیعی از رشد است. اما اگر این تحول بهدرستی طی نشود، فرد در بزرگسالی همچنان برای حفظ احساس ارزشمندی خود، به تأیید مداوم دیگران وابسته میماند. در چنین وضعیتی، دیگری کمتر ب…
🐺 روایتی از کیس های فروید | قسمت دوم مرد گرگی؛ فروید بعد از ماهها تحلیل، به این نتیجه رسید که کابوس گرگها اصلاً درباره گرگها نبوده است. او معتقد بود کودک در حدود یکسالونیمسالگی، بهطور اتفاقی صحنهای از رابطه جنسی والدینش را دیده (چیزی که فروید آن را «صحنه آغازین» یا Primal Scene مینامید). کودک آن زمان توان درک این اتفاق را نداشته، اما چند سال بعد، با رشد ذهنیاش، آن تجربه برایش معنا پیدا کرده و به شکل اضطراب…
🐺 روایتی از کیس های فروید | قسمت اول مرد گرگی؛ مردی جوان، ثروتمند و تحصیلکرده وارد مطب فروید شد. او سالها بود از افسردگی، اضطراب، وسواس و احساس پوچی رنج میبرد. پزشکان زیادی او را دیده بودند، اما هیچکدام نتوانسته بودند علت اصلی رنجش را پیدا کنند. فروید، برخلاف انتظار، از علائم بیماری شروع نکرد. از او پرسید: «اولین خوابی که هنوز به خاطر داری چیست؟» مرد مکثی کرد و گفت: «کودک بودم. نیمهشب از خواب پریدم. پنجر…
Sticker, posted without a caption
❤1
کتاب پی دی اف « رازهای روانشناسی تاریک » چیزی حدود ۱۳۴ صفحه که خودم درحال خواندنش هستم وتقریبا ۱۲۵ صفحه خوندم موضوع کتاب مشخصه روانشناسی تاریک مثل تبلیغات های الان فضای مجازی توضیح درباره آدمای خودشیفته وتاثیر آنها بر زندگی ما « مثلا همین بلاگرا و زندگی های لاکچری و تیپ واستایل همیشه برابر وعالی روزانه وروش کنترل وکشیدن ما به سمت اونا وزندگی مثل اونا » کنترل ما توسط کنترل گران مسلط به این سبک از روانشناسی روش های …
❤1👍1
📕 کتاب : عشق و اراده ✍ اثر : #رولو_می نیچه اغلب از "دوست داشتن سرنوشت" سخن میگفت. منظورش این بود که بشر میتواند مستقیما با سرنوشت رویاروی شود، آن را بشناسد، شهامت به خرج دهد، آن را بنوازد، به چالش کشد، با آن بستیزد و به آن عشق بورزد. با این كه براى ما "ارباب سرنوشت خویشیم"، جملهای متکبرانهست، ولی ما را از قربانی سرنوشت بودن محافظت میکند. ما حقیقتا در آفرینش سرنوشتمان دخیلیم.
کارل گوستاو یونگ میگه: خطرناکترین نشانه روانی، همیشه خشم یا اندوه نیست؛ گاهی آرامشی است که دیگر هیچ هیجانی را احساس نمیکند. آنچه گاهی «آرامش» به نظر میرسد، ممکن است در واقع بیحسی هیجانی (Emotional Numbing) باشد؛ واکنشی که مغز در برابر تروما یا استرس مزمن برای بقا ایجاد میکند. در این وضعیت، مسئله این نیست که درد از بین رفته؛ بلکه ظرفیت تجربه کردن احساسات، موقتاً خاموش شده است. به همین دلیل، یکی از ظریفترین مه…
همش بیکاری و دوسداری مستقل شی ؟! :) | @milionersho 😴🧳| آموزشِ صفر تا 💯 کسب درآمد با گـوشی : | @milionersho📱💰 | 𖥦 ·𖥦 ·𖥦 ·𖥦 ·𖥦 ·𖥦 ·𖥦 ·𖥦 ·𖥦 · 𖧷💙آموزش ادیت اینشات @instagram_Galaxy 𖧷🦋آموزش کامل اینستاگرام @instagram_nexus 𖧷💙لاو کده آهو @eeshhhgg 𖧷🦋کلیپهای احساسی و غمگین @Emotionalclips1 𖧷💙کلیپ کوردی شاد @kordy2019 𖧷🦋کوچه ی خیال تو @Delnoooot 𖧷💙دلنویس | تکست | مود @Nafas_barvar 𖧷🦋آهنگ هوشمصنوعی @reeraatext 𖧷💙یڪ فنجان حا…
پارادوکسِ نظم و آشوب انیشتین یه جایی گفته بود: "در دلِ هر دشواری، نهفتهای از فرصت وجود دارد." اما حقیقتِ ماجرا این است که ما معمولاً در دشواریها، فقط به دنبال بازگشت به "نظمِ قبلی" هستیم. غافل از اینکه گاهی سیستم باید فرو بپاشد تا ساختارِ جدیدی شکل بگیرد. در روابط انسانی هم همین است؛ گاهی یک دعوای بزرگ، یک سکوتِ طولانی یا یک دوریِ ناگهانی، نه پایانِ ماجرا، که نقطه شروعِ یک تعادلِ تازه است. از آشفتگی نترسید؛ ستار…
اگه موفقیت فرزندانتون براتون مهمه، این نکات رو رعایت کنید. #روانشناسی
همه مان به استثنا داریم پیر میشویم #اجرا_خلیل_اکبری
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @psydynamic1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 928,491 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@psydynamic1 named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“روانشناسی خودآگاه” (@psydynamic1), 457 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psydynamic1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.