Channel
@psychophonynya
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
83subscribers
+6 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002094961956 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @psychophonynya |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/psychophonynya |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 00:58 | 83 | +4 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 23:02 | 79 | +1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 11:07 | 78 | +3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 06:53 | 75 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:13 | 77 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:46 | 77 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
196 reactions across 13 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5188324071275791316 | 52 | 26.5% | |
| custom 5222143361024032877 | 42 | 21.4% | |
| custom 5188433408258247872 | 31 | 15.8% | |
| custom 5188655866089342376 | 28 | 14.3% | |
| custom 5188155571118835773 | 16 | 8.16% | |
| custom 5188158410092219427 | 16 | 8.16% | |
| custom 5188445953857717330 | 11 | 5.61% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 196 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
прикол рофлянка я не прошла по голосам в один аск, впервые. у мя 68%, когда нужно 75% при этом никто не написал в комментах чё не так, даже в гугл форму, где можно написать анонимную критику не вывезли меня короче, все ясно🐈⬛
custom 51884334082582478724custom 51881555711188357731custom 51881584100922194271custom 51883240712757913161custom 51886558660893423761custom 52221433610240328771
горчица ларпит спаркл @bolink_23
custom 51883240712757913167custom 51884459538577173302custom 51881584100922194271custom 51886558660893423761custom 52221433610240328771
вот урод, набрал больше чем вивика ахуел инцел совсем
custom 52221433610240328773custom 51884334082582478721
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 522214336102403287710custom 51884334082582478724custom 51881584100922194273custom 51881555711188357731custom 51883240712757913161custom 51886558660893423761
жеееееееееееесть
custom 51883240712757913167custom 51881555711188357733custom 51881584100922194271custom 51884459538577173301custom 51886558660893423761custom 52221433610240328771
немного кривенько вышло, but I tried💕
custom 51886558660893423768custom 51883240712757913162custom 51881555711188357731custom 51881584100922194271custom 51884459538577173301custom 52221433610240328771
Video, posted without a caption
custom 51883240712757913169custom 51881555711188357731custom 51884334082582478721custom 51886558660893423761custom 52221433610240328771
вот если бы грандберри ивент ТАК закончился, я бы не возражала... 🎵💕
custom 51883240712757913169custom 52221433610240328774custom 51881555711188357732custom 51886558660893423762custom 51881584100922194271custom 51884334082582478721custom 51884459538577173301
я щас на стену лезть буду с этого ленивого нового музыкального ивента( и отсутствия костюмчика на блэк лимонад🐈⬛
custom 518832407127579131610custom 52221433610240328773custom 51881555711188357731custom 51884334082582478721custom 51884459538577173301custom 51886558660893423761
а типа а-а-а короче знаете 2 глава вышла и т.д. https://t.me/lastbroadcastcomic
custom 51884334082582478728custom 51884459538577173302custom 51881555711188357731custom 51881584100922194271custom 51883240712757913161custom 51886558660893423761custom 52221433610240328771
жесть, оказывается, сегодня #PortfolioDay штош надеюсь не слишком поздно для репостов 👜
custom 51884334082582478727custom 51886558660893423765custom 51881555711188357731custom 51881584100922194271custom 51883240712757913161custom 51884459538577173301custom 52221433610240328771
и камнем внииииииз с крыши домааа
custom 52221433610240328777custom 51881584100922194274custom 51884334082582478723custom 51886558660893423763custom 51881555711188357731custom 51883240712757913161custom 51884459538577173301
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @psychophonynya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“психофония” (@psychophonynya), 83 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psychophonynya.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.