Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for INTIMACY

Channel

INTIMACY

@psychologywithKam

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

151subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001307048950
TypeChannel
Username@psychologywithKam
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/psychologywithKam

Growth

1461521497 August 2026 — 149 subscribers8 August 2026 — 149 subscribers14 August 2026 — 150 subscribers21 August 2026 — 152 subscribers28 August 2026 — 149 subscribers5 September 2026 — 146 subscribers14 September 2026 — 151 subscribers1517 August 202614 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 38 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 145–153 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 04:21151+5
5 Sept 2026, 21:16146-3
28 Aug 2026, 17:42149-3
21 Aug 2026, 19:54152+2
14 Aug 2026, 16:28150+1
8 Aug 2026, 20:02149no change
7 Aug 2026, 03:00149first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 11 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
15s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

10 reactions across 4 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
770.0%
💯220.0%
😍110.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 12:48 UTC60 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Мою статью рекомендовали к публикации! Ого, я просто написала доклад на интересную мне тему, а кто-то считает мою статью полезной для других парных терапевтов…Они прямо читать и брать в работу что-то будут из нее? Вы не представляете, как мне радостно и удивительно. Учитывая, что, когда год назад моя коллега предложила мне написать статью, я подумала, что это простая вежливость. О чем я могу написать, чтобы это напе

5

30 Jul 2026, 16:47 UTCviews —

INTIMACY pinned «Проявляться, достигать успеха, заявлять о себе классно!✨ Для этого только необходимо присвоить свою значимость, освободиться от токсичного влияния стыда и внутренней критики и разрешить себе быть собой 🫂 •Поэтому напоминаю, что 12-13го сентября жду вас…»

28 Jul 2026, 12:49 UTCviews —

INTIMACY pinned ««Ближе» практикум о любви Для тех, кто хочет здоровых и наполняющих отношений, но столкнулся с трудностями и ищет ответы на вопросы о самой любви, о мужчинах и женщинах, о том, как же нам эти отношения построить— я открыла продажи своего проекта «Ближе»…»

26 Jul 2026, 18:52 UTC93 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Жизнь- как она есть 💛 Надеюсь, вы заботились о своем ментальном состоянии на этих выходных: отдыхали, нашли время для того, чтобы прислушаться к себе, замедлились, замечали жизнь здесь и сейчас. Видео 2 для вас, если нужно расслабиться и выдохнуть напряжение, просто включите со звуком, не благодарите 🫂

😍1

16 Jul 2026, 16:45 UTC126 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Нейробиология любовной зависимости ❤️‍🩹

15 Jul 2026, 12:22 UTC111 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

💬Быть признанной авторитетными для меня людьми- было невыносимо грустно. Я не могла понять, почему? Почему признание моего преподавателя или благодарность коллег за проведенное занятие - вызывают печаль? Это же хорошо? Потому что я не верила в это, я не верила, что достойна. Признание за профессиональные достижения и за сильное мышление - были для меня чем-то новым. За красоту и милость- пожалуйста. Но за мышление

2

11 Jul 2026, 10:37 UTC99 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Love bombing: как не стать жертвой манипуляции в начале отношений ⬇️

💯2

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @psychologywithKam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“INTIMACY” (@psychologywithKam), 151 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psychologywithKam.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.