Channel
@psychology_mind
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
868subscribers
+10 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001029823466 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @psychology_mind |
| Created | Between 1 February 2016 and 30 April 2016 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/psychology_mind |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:53 | 868 | +1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 07:24 | 867 | +3 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 15:49 | 864 | -2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:05 | 866 | +8 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:48 | 858 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 21:07 | 858 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
69 reactions across 20 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👏 | 41 | 59.4% | |
| 👍 | 20 | 29.0% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 7.25% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 4.35% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 69 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
امروز یه جمله خواندم که خیلی خوب بود، «دوست داشته شدن، یعنی آنقدر عزیز باشی که کسی، رنجِ همراهی با تو را نه باری بر دوش، که بهایی شیرین برای حضورت بداند.» @psychology_mind
👏2
Signed MOHAMMAD ALI MALEK
از اهمیت دادن زیاد بیاهمیت میشید، از خوبی کردن زیاد بدی میبینید.. از مهربونی کردن زیادم، احمق به حساب میاید! خلاصه که اگه تو احساساتت با آدما تعادل نداشته باشی، حتی اگه دریایی خوبی و مهربونی باشی، یا ازت زده میشن یا سواستفاده میکنن . @psychology_mind
👍3❤1
Signed MOHAMMAD ALI MALEK
یادمان باشد با شکستن پای دیگران ما بهتر راه نخواهیم رفت ! یادمان باشد با شکستن دل دیگران ما خوشبخت تر نمی شویم ! کاش بدانیم اگر دلیل اشک کسی شویم دیگر با او طرف نیستیم باخدای او طرف هستیم . . . @psychology_mind
👍3👏1
Signed MOHAMMAD ALI MALEK
از ما هیچ چیز باقی نمی ماند جز خاطراتی که در آن دلیلِ حالِ خوبِ دیگری بوده ایم. تا میتوانید دلیل حال خوب بقیه باشید حتی با یک پیام.. @psychology_mind
👍2❤1🥰1
Signed MOHAMMAD ALI MALEK
آدمای نابالغ هیچوقت نگاه نمیکنن که رفتار خودشون چی بوده که باعث شده متقابلا چی دریافت کنن، اون ها دیدگاه یکطرفه دارن و قبل از تفکر درباره رفتار خودشون، فقط به تغییر رفتار آدما باهاشون نگاه میکنن و ناراحت میشن و در نقش قربانی فرو میرن و میگن مگه من چیکردم! آدما چقدر بی دلیل باهات بدمیشن! @psychology_mind
👏2🥰1
Signed MOHAMMAD ALI MALEK
اکثر آدما یک ظرفیت و جنبه مشخصی دارن که اگر بیشتر از اون بهشون بها داده بشه ممکنه خودشونو گم کنن و فکر کنن خبریه!، به همین خاطر نباید هرکسی رو اشباع کرد چون ممکنه در مورد جایگاه خودش دچار توهم بشه @psychology_mind
👏3🥰1
Signed MOHAMMAD ALI MALEK
ریشه که داشته باشی به لبه پرتگاه می آیی اما سقوط نمیکنی؛ ریشه شعور، تربیت، شخصیت، انسانیت و شرف واقعی یک انسان است و ربطی به پول و تحصیلات ندارد. @psychology_mind
👏3
Signed MOHAMMAD ALI MALEK
يه حقیقتی تو دهه ۴۰ زندگی هست که باید بدونین خوش اندام بودن در ٢٠ سالگی چیز عجیبی نيست متابوليسم وهورمون هات سرجاشن، ولى اينكه توى ۴۰ سالگی هنوز فيت بمونى يعنی با وجود كار ،فشار زندگی خستگی و شلوغى روزمره، بازم رسيدگی به خودت و بدنت رو رها نكردى. توى ۴۰ سالگی هم هنوز جوونى اگه حس ميكنی بدنت فرسوده شده يا حال خوبى ندارى،دليلش بالا رفتن سن نيست سبک زندگی و انتخابهات بوده.بعد از ۴۰ سالگی ،به دو دسته تقسيم ميشيم: اونايى …
👏2
Signed MOHAMMAD ALI MALEK
اگه وقتتو صرف دنبال کردن پروانه ها کنی اونا فرار میکنن؛ اما اگه وقتتو صرف ساختن یه باغ زیبا کنی، پروانه خودشون به سمتت میان. و اگه نیومدن تو حداقل یه باغ قشنگ داری. @psychology_mind
👍5
Signed MOHAMMAD ALI MALEK
انسان از کاغذی بی ارزش پول ساخت... اما پول از انسان چه موجودات پست و كثيفی كه نساخت ...! @psychology_mind
👏3❤1
Signed MOHAMMAD ALI MALEK
اینو یادتون باشه که ... بدون خطر، عظمتی وجود نداره. بدون تلاش، شانسی وجود نداره. بدون صداقت، احترامی وجود نداره. بدون تغییر، پیشرفتی وجود نداره. بدون اعتماد، رابطهای وجود نداره. بدون فداکاری، موفقیتی وجود نداره. و بدون تعهد، عشقی وجود نداره... @psychology_mind
👏3
Signed MOHAMMAD ALI MALEK
برای پرنده اهمیتی نداره که کسی به آوازش گوش میده یا نه ، اصلا حضور شنونده براش مهم نیست و برای بدست آوردن چیزی آواز نمیخونه اینکارو فقط برای شور و نشاط خودش انجام میده .. بدون شک راه درست زندگی کردن همینه... @psychology_mind
👏6
Signed MOHAMMAD ALI MALEK
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @psychology_mind. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“روانشناسی ذهن” (@psychology_mind), 868 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psychology_mind.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.