Photo, posted without a caption
custom 54111239793373435494custom 54676221438124612792

Channel
@psychology_andyou
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry
57subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002267465436 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @psychology_andyou |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/psychology_andyou |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 1 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Oct 2026, 00:40 | 57 | +1 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 23:16 | 56 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:01 | 55 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:12 | 55 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 28 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
99 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5435971121058947749 | 18 | 18.2% | |
| custom 5467622143812461279 | 16 | 16.2% | |
| custom 5434031913260035048 | 14 | 14.1% | |
| custom 5217563379698253773 | 13 | 13.1% | |
| custom 5458382591121964689 | 11 | 11.1% | |
| custom 5330317794615520344 | 9 | 9.09% | |
| custom 5411123979337343549 | 9 | 9.09% | |
| custom 5237833447786953553 | 5 | 5.05% | |
| custom 5379584402395258873 | 4 | 4.04% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 99 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 28 June 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 54111239793373435494custom 54676221438124612792
Как изменить свой тип привязанности 🧠 Завершаем эту тему важной мыслью: Тип привязанности — это не генетический приговор. В нейробиологии есть понятие пластичности мозга, благодаря которой мы можем переписать старые детские сценарии и обрести так называемую «приобретенную надежность». Вот 3 научно доказанных шага, как это сделать: 1️⃣Осознайте свои «триггеры» • Если вы тревожный: Когда партнер задерживает ответ, …
custom 52175633796982537735custom 54583825911219646892
Цикл избегающего типа привязанности в отношениях
custom 54583825911219646894custom 54340319132600350483
Избегающий тип привязанности: «Мне никто не нужен, я независим» Если тревожный тип привязанности требует: «Будь ближе!», то избегающий (около 25% населения) при первой же попытке сблизиться выстраивает железобетонную стену. Как это работает в детстве: Родители избегающего ребенка были холодными, отвергающими или требовали «быть сильным» и не плакать. Ребенок сделал болезненный, но логичный вывод: «Просить о помощи…
custom 53303177946155203445custom 54340319132600350483custom 54583825911219646893
Тревожный тип привязанности «Он прочитал сообщение и не отвечает мне 15 минут. Наверное, я надоела, он разлюбил и хочет расстаться». Знакомо? Тогда добро пожаловать в мир тревожного типа привязанности (около 20% людей). 👶Как это работает в детстве: Родители тревожного ребенка были непредсказуемыми. То душили любовью, то были холодными и занятыми своими проблемами. Ребенок усвоил паттерн: «Чтобы получить любовь, ну…
custom 54676221438124612796custom 52175633796982537734
держитесь
custom 54111239793373435495custom 52175633796982537734
Надежный тип привязанности: амбассадоры здоровых отношений Пока я путешествую, мы с вами продолжаем важную тему про типы привязанности. Если вам повезло родиться или стать обладателем надежного типа (таких людей в мире около 50-60%), то ваши отношения строятся не из страха одиночества или попыток закрыть душевные травмы, а на взаимном желании делиться счастьем, договариваться и расти вместе. Как это работает в детс…
custom 54676221438124612796custom 53303177946155203442custom 54340319132600350482
Поднялась на Эльбрус 🏔️ И голова болела, и дышать было тяжело от нехватки кислорода, и давление ощутимо Но это настолько захватывает дух! До 3000м было тепло и солнышко жарило , самочувствие хорошее🐥 Дальше снег, холод и контраст с зеленой травой, которую видела 15 минут назад на предыдущем подъеме Из нового: узнала, что облепиховый чай нормализует давление Делюсь с вами впечатлениями 🥰
custom 54359711210589477499custom 54340319132600350483custom 52378334477869535532custom 53303177946155203442
Типы привязанности Почему в отношениях один постоянно требует внимания и боится бросить партнера, а другой при первой же ссоре «уходит в пещеру» и закрывается? Всё дело в типе привязанности. Это модель поведения, которая программируется в нашем мозге в первый год жизни и определяет, как мы будем любить во взрослом возрасте. 🧠 эксперимент: В 1970-х годах психолог Мэри Эйнсворт провела культовое исследование «Странн…
custom 54359711210589477494custom 52378334477869535533custom 54583825911219646892
Для тех, кто еще не видел 👆🏻🎀
custom 54359711210589477495
https://psytests.org/depr/bdi-run.html Рекомендую к прохождению Шкалу депрессии Бека❤️
custom 54340319132600350483custom 54676221438124612792
Выберите тему 🌸
The shares total 150%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @psychology_andyou. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Выберите тему 🌸
The shares total 150%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 28 June 2026 to 9 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Мир Психологии” (@psychology_andyou), 57 subscribers as measured 11 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psychology_andyou.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.