Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

مطالعه کیس های روانپزشکی | بالینت متد

@psycho_case

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7,755subscribers

+44 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002111995656
TypeChannel
Username@psycho_case
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/psycho_case

Growth

7,7117,7557,7337 August 2026 — 7,711 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,711 subscribers8 August 2026 — 7,729 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,742 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,755 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net +44. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,704–7,762 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 23:177,755+13
10 Aug 2026, 19:567,742+13
8 Aug 2026, 06:347,729+18
7 Aug 2026, 14:017,711no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:517,711first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 11 May 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.44%
avg views ÷ 7,755 subscribers
Avg views / post
112
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held21 (11 May 202510 August 2026)
Views total112
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 17:10 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

155 reactions across 13 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
13184.5%
👍117.10%
👌95.81%
🙏31.94%
👏10.645%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 155reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 11 May 2025 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 19:26 UTC112 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @tabadolhyper

یه لیست کامل از بهترین گروه‌های تلگرام! 🎯 از برنامه‌نویسی و کریپتو تا فیلم، کتاب و بازی از آموزش زبان و علم تا هنر، ورزش و فلسفه هر سلیقه‌ای داری، اینجا یه گروه مناسب برات هست تازه‌ترین اخبار و بحث‌های روز رو هم داره هم‌فکرهای جدید پیدا کن و چیزای تازه یاد بگیر همین الان بزن رو لینک و عضو بهترین گروه‌ها شو👇 https://t.me/addlist/-9LTI_sujzczODU0

25 Jun 2026, 13:01 UTC≈3,050 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

7⃣ تشخیص افتراقی: اختلال پانیک اختلال اضطراب فراگیر اختلال اضطراب ناشی از بیماری جسمی (رد شد) اختلال اضطراب ناشی از مصرف مواد یا کافئین 8⃣ تشخیص اولیه (طبق DSM-5): همراه با ویژگی‌های آگورافوبیک خفیف 9⃣ طرح درمان پیشنهادی: آموزش روانی درباره ماهیت حملات پانیک دارودرمانی: SSRI (مثلاً سرترالین ۵۰ میلی‌گرم روزانه) بنزودیازپین کوتاه‌مدت فقط در شروع درمان روان‌درمانی CBT با تمرکز بر مواجهه بین‌بدنی اصلاح سبک زندگی: کاهش

6

25 Jun 2026, 12:59 UTC≈2,370 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

؛➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 👤معرفی #کیس (14) ؛➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 1⃣ اطلاعات هویتی بیمار: نام: آقای ن. سن: ۳۶ سال وضعیت تأهل: متأهل شغل: راننده تاکسی اینترنتی تاریخ مراجعه: ۱۴۰۳/۱۲/۱۸ محل ارجاع: اورژانس بیمارستان پس از مراجعه مکرر با علائم جسمی 2⃣ شکایت اصلی: «یه‌دفعه قلبم تند می‌زنه، نفسم بالا نمیاد، فکر می‌کنم الان می‌میرم.» 3⃣ تاریخچه مشکل فعلی: بیمار طی ۸ ماه گذشته دچار حملات ناگهانی و مکرر اضطراب شدید شده است که بدون هشدار قبلی شروع می

6

2 Jan 2026, 06:24 UTC≈3,710 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026

7⃣ تشخیص افتراقی: بی‌اشتهایی عصبی (Anorexia Nervosa) بولیمیا (در صورت وجود رفتارهای جبرانی مثل استفراغ – گزارش نشده) اختلال بدشکلی بدن (اما اینجا تمرکز اصلی بر وزن و غذاست) افسردگی اساسی با کاهش اشتها (اما اشتغال ذهنی به وزن مطرح است) 8⃣ تشخیص اولیه (طبق DSM-5): اختلال بی‌اشتهایی عصبی (Anorexia Nervosa, Restricting Type) 9⃣ طرح درمان پیشنهادی: ✔️بستری در بخش روان‌پزشکی/داخلی به دلیل خطر طبی (BMI پایین، قطع قاعدگی

10👌2

2 Jan 2026, 06:24 UTC≈2,750 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

؛➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 👤معرفی #کیس (13) ؛➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 1⃣ اطلاعات هویتی بیمار: نام: خانم س. سن: ۱۹ سال وضعیت تأهل: مجرد وضعیت تحصیلی: دانشجوی سال اول تاریخ مراجعه: ۱۴۰۳/۱۲/۰۵ محل ارجاع: توسط خانواده به کلینیک روانپزشکی 2⃣ شکایت اصلی: مادر بیمار: «دخترم تقریباً دیگه غذا نمی‌خوره. خیلی لاغر شده، ولی هنوز می‌گه چاقم.» 3⃣ تاریخچه مشکل فعلی: بیمار از حدود دو سال پیش رژیم غذایی سختگیرانه‌ای را شروع کرده و به تدریج مصرف غذا را کاهش داده

5

30 Dec 2025, 20:45 UTC≈2,860 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

7⃣ تشخیص افتراقی: اختلال عصبی-شناختی عمده (Major Neurocognitive Disorder – آلزایمر) اختلال عصبی-شناختی عروقی (به دلیل سابقه فشار خون و دیابت) هذیان ناشی از عفونت یا متابولیک ( با آزمایشات لازم) دمانس با اجسام لویی (در صورت غالب بودن توهمات بینایی) 8⃣ تشخیص اولیه (طبق DSM-5): اختلال عصبی-شناختی عمده محتمل ناشی از بیماری آلزایمر (Major Neurocognitive Disorder, probable Alzheimer’s disease) 9⃣ طرح درمان پیشنهادی: دار

5

30 Dec 2025, 20:45 UTC≈2,550 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

؛➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 👤معرفی #کیس (13) ؛➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 1⃣ اطلاعات هویتی بیمار: نام: آقای ر. سن: ۷۱ سال وضعیت تأهل: متأهل، دارای سه فرزند بزرگسال شغل سابق: بازنشسته بانک تاریخ مراجعه: ۱۴۰۳/۱۱/۰۲ محل ارجاع: کلینیک سالمندی به درخواست خانواده 2⃣ شکایت اصلی: همسر بیمار: «چند وقتیه چیزها رو فراموش می‌کنه، حتی اسم نوه‌هاشو. شب‌ها هم سرگردان می‌شه و بعضی وقتا خیال می‌کنه دزد توی خونه‌ست.» 3⃣ تاریخچه مشکل فعلی: بیمار در دو سال گذشته دچار

4👍1

28 Aug 2025, 15:02 UTC≈10,100 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

3

28 Aug 2025, 15:01 UTC≈9,960 views22 reactionsread 12 August 2026

7⃣ تشخیص افتراقی: اختلال شخصیت مرزی (Borderline Personality Disorder) اختلال دوقطبی نوع II (بررسی چرخه‌های خلقی ضروری است) اختلال افسردگی اساسی با ویژگی‌های مرزی ؛PTSD ناشی از سوءرفتار دوران کودکی (نیاز به بررسی بیشتر) 8⃣ تشخیص اولیه (طبق DSM-5): ؛F60.3 - اختلال شخصیت مرزی (Borderline Personality Disorder) 9⃣ طرح درمان پیشنهادی: بستری کوتاه‌مدت برای ایمنی پس از اقدام به خودزنی روان‌درمانی دیالکتیکی (DBT) به

14👌7👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @psycho_case. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“مطالعه کیس های روانپزشکی | بالینت متد” (@psycho_case), 7,755 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psycho_case.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.