Channel
@psychiatry_conf
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
144subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003868789477 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @psychiatry_conf |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/psychiatry_conf |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 10:17 | 144 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:16 | 149 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:40 | 149 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:15 | 150 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (23 July 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,007 |
| Reactions total | 29 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 20:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
29 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5345824602239016465 | 8 | 27.6% | |
| custom 5444909231469771073 | 7 | 24.1% | |
| custom 5350792603795220215 | 5 | 17.2% | |
| custom 5222449480523082761 | 4 | 13.8% | |
| custom 5440883077586893345 | 3 | 10.3% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 6.90% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🥰 : 🥹ᑭET’S ᑕOᑎᖴESSIOᑎ 🥹 🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀 хочу поделиться фотографиями своего домашнего питомца !! 🥺 🥹 посоветуйте корм . . . @petscff_bot ▶️ mp , поиск админов , волонтеры , каналы по животным , rеклама , owner : nnasbekk ◀️
Signed ꫀׁׅܻ݊𝙢𝓊८һׁׅ֮ₖᥲ (·'╻'·)ᵎᵎᵎ
здравия, кф, у меня еще один небольшой вопрос. я очень люблю своих друзей и у них бывают тяжелые ситуации, в которых я всегда готов их поддержать и понять, но почему то я теряю в себе силы. будто сам переживаю эту ситуацию и начинаю чувствовать не гордость, а злость к себе за то, что я делаю, хотя я делаю хорошие вещи для друзей и они мне благодарны. когда меня благодарят, мне вроде приятно, а будто я и не хотел, что…
custom 53458246022390164653
Signed психиатрия кф тейки
насколько вы погружены в психологию?? мой мозг проводит неконтролируемый анализ,из за чего я быстро понимаю проблемы человека, его настроение, что он ждет от меня и чего хочет, подмечаю мелкие детали и исходя из них понимаю многие факты о нем, даже если тот мне их не говорил. мне интересно, есть ли тут у кого то тоже самое, потому что мне часто говорят, что до момента моих слов о многом не задумывались, хотя для меня…
custom 54449092314697710732
Signed психиатрия кф тейки
привет, некоторое время назад (приблизительно 5 месяцев) я начал замечать что я "выцветаю", отдаляюсь от общества и друзей, начинаю навязывать себе что все чувства и эмоции вокруг ложные, вру и другим и себе насчет всякого, да и вообще у меня упало чувство эмпатии и я испытываю трудности в понятии чужого несчастья а месяц назад, еще в начале июля я и вовсе сказал себе и другим что тратить ресурсы на поиск друзей это …
Signed психиатрия кф тейки
здравствуйте кф, я несколько месяцев назад я начал терять интерес к людям и вещам которые происходят вокруг меня, у меня сильно понизилось чувство эмпатии да и вообще, реакция стала притупленной и я уже не ощущаю счастье настолько ярким, каким оно было. я будто больше не имею поводов для счастья, скажу еще что начал подозревать у себя возможную социопатию ? я с рождения конечно имел трудности с коммуникацией и у меня…
custom 53458246022390164651
Signed психиатрия кф тейки
я несовершеннолетняя, уже 2 месяца меня преследует убежденность в изнасиловании, насилии, в том, что меня отпиздят толпой и в конце концов мне придется оказаться на месте жертвы. Раньше тоже было похожее, но эта мысль была более чужой, и я бы не сказала что тогда была убеждена в ней так, как сейчас, скорее просто страх изнасилования и насилия из-за которого я читала статьи по самообороне, хотела приобрести перцовый б…
🤝1
Signed психиатрия кф тейки
tw : слфх , агрессивность , мизантропия , социофобия p.s : пишу я немного не грамотно и на эмоциях , все просто накипело. мне 17 лет. я нахожусь на учете в психбольнице и в полиции из-за " мелкого хулиганства " связанного со школой ( говорить не буду , могу сказать только , что история очень глупая и я глупо поступил ). вообще у меня сильная агрессия которую я направляю на себя , хотя были попытки направить её на л…
🤝1
Signed психиатрия кф тейки
это ужас ೀ܀⊹˙┆ @psychiatrytake_bot , @psychiatry_conf ┆˙⊹܀ೀ #тейк
custom 53507926037952202155custom 53458246022390164654custom 52224494805230827613custom 54408830775868933453
Signed психиатрия кф тейки
[🌻] — йейй, нас 150!! спасибо вам огромное!
Signed ꫀׁׅܻ݊𝙢𝓊८һׁׅ֮ₖᥲ (·'╻'·)ᵎᵎᵎ
здравия кф, у меня небольшой вопрос. вообщем, меня беспокоит то, что я могу вздрагивать на ровном месте. обычно такое происходит несколько раз за день. я немного нервный человек, но таковых триггеров или чего то еще у меня нет, кофеин ни в каком виде не употребляю. ктото знает, что с этим делать? или стоит обратиться к неврологу? —аноним ೀ܀⊹˙┆ @psychiatrytake_bot , @psychiatry_conf ┆˙⊹܀ೀ #тейк
Signed психиатрия кф тейки
Здравствуйте, кф! Хочу поинтересоваться кое-чем. Мне 15 лет, достаточно сильные тревожные мысли. Мелочи триггерят меня на эти тревожные мысли и я не могу ничего делать, ибо все время думаю о том, что меня тревожит. Мне говорят обратиться к специалисту, но я не знаю как преподнести это своим родным. У меня достаточно скептичная семья и для них ментальные проблемы — это не проблемы вовсе. Буду рад если что-нибудь посов…
Signed психиатрия кф тейки
я на протяжении нескольких лет подозреваю у себя рпп, психологи и терапия не помогают, и я страдаю от " расстройства " очень долго. сейчас с трудом я вышла в реммисию, но у меня нет месячных уже 2+ месяца скажите, могут ли мне поставить диагноз (мне нет 16-18), и как это отразится в моем будущем? смогут ли меня без проблем взять на работу? ೀ܀⊹˙┆ @psychiatrytake_bot , @psychiatry_conf ┆˙⊹܀ೀ #тейк
Signed психиатрия кф тейки
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @psychiatry_conf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
[🌻] — как думаете, хорошая идея выкладывать сюда иногда какие-нибудь статьи/телеграфы, связанные с темой кф (быть может даже написанные мной), файлики с книжками по самотерапии/описании расстройсв и т.п.?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 422,039 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“psychiatry confession 📋” (@psychiatry_conf), 144 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psychiatry_conf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.