4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,506–1,513 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 15:24
1,512
+4
9 Aug 2026, 09:52
1,508
+1
6 Aug 2026, 07:36
1,507
no change
5 Aug 2026, 20:55
1,507
first reading
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 18 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
17.5%
avg views ÷ 1,512 subscribers
Avg views / post
264
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0.758%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 12 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 July 2026
Posts held
12 (18 November 2025 – 21 July 2026)
Views total
264
Reactions total
2
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 18:12 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
68 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
37
54.4%
👏
21
30.9%
👌
8
11.8%
😱
1
1.47%
🙏
1
1.47%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 68reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 18 November 2025 to 21 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
👥 پیشگیری اجتماعی سکته مغزی
(Primordial Prevention)
✍ دکتر بابک زمانی؛ یادداشت روز دوشنبه روزنامه شرق
👤 پیشگیری اجتماعی، که گاه از آن با عنوان «پیشگیری بنیادین» نیز یاد میشود، بهتازگی بهطور رسمی در آخرین ویرایش مراجع و گایدلاینهای پزشکی وارد شده است. با این حال، سالها پیش هرگاه در مصاحبهها میپرسیدند که مردم چه کار کنند تا سکته مغزی نکنند، میگفتیم ابتدا باید پرسید دولت چه کار کند که مردم سکته مغزی نکنند؟
👤…
🔘 یادآوری پیشنهاد انجمنهای علمی و سازمانهای مردمنهاد به تاریخ پنجم اسفند ۱۴۰۳، برای تعیین روز «آگاهی از ضربهی روانی»:
جناب آقای دکتر محمدرضا ظفرقندی
وزیر محترم بهداشت، درمان و آموزش پزشکی
با سلام و احترام.
نظر به اهمیت آگاهسازی عمومی در ارتباط با نقش مهم ضربهی روانی (تروما) در زندگی فردی و اجتماعی مردم و تابآوری جامعه، انجمنها و تشکلهای زیر پیشنهاد میکنند روزی به عنوان نماد یادآوری اثر مخرب ضربهی روانی و…
📎 پیام همدردی و تسلیت
دیدگاههای انجمن علمی روانپزشکان ایران
در مورد حوادث تلخ دیماه ۱۴۰۴
انجمن علمی روانپزشکان ایران بر خود فرض میداند کشتهشدن جمعی از هموطنانمان را به ملت شریف و داغدار ایران تسلیت بگوید و همدردی خود را در قبال این ضایعه فراموشنشدنی ابراز نماید. ما همچنین خشونت عریانی را که شاهدش بودیم، بهشدت محکوم میکنیم.
برای یافتن ریشههای بحران لازم نیست راه درازی بپیماییم و دست به تئوریسازیهای غر…
🔘 ترومای جمعی دیماه: شکست شاهکلید
➖ بخش دوم و آخر
✍️ امیر شعبانی
سوگ: محور نادیدهگرفتهشدهی ترومای جمعی
اعتبارزدایی نظاممند از ترومای جمعی مردم در قالب ادبیات رسمی و رسانهای، اجرای سوگواری مؤثر را نیز دشوار کرد. بنابراین بازماندگان نه فقط با فقدان عزیزان، بلکه با سوگی بیمجال، بیروایت و بهرسمیتنشناخته مواجه شدند. در ادبیات روانپزشکی تروما، از این وضعیت با عنوان disenfranchised grief یاد میشود؛ سوگی که…
🔘 ترومای جمعی دیماه: شکست شاهکلید
➖ بخش اول
✍️ امیر شعبانی
دیماه ۱۴۰۴ را میتوان نمونه برجستهای از تجربه ترومای جمعی در جامعه ایران دانست؛ ترومایی که هنوز به پایان نرسیده است. وضعیت پیش از این فاجعه عبارت بود از حرکتی جمعی به سمت «دامنه هرم نیازهای مازلو» و زندگی برای بقا، زمینهای از «سلامت روانی-اجتماعی نزولی»، شرایط بحران در بحران و «انباشت بحرانهای رسیدگینشده»، «بلاتکلیفی» درازمدت در ابعاد گوناگون زندگی،…
ما اهل علم ایران چکار داریم میکنیم؟
سخنرانی رضا منصوری
چهارشنبه ۱۰ دی ۱۴۰۴، ساعت ۱۵:۰۰
پژوهشگاه دانشهای بنیادی، پژوهشکده علوم زیستی
تهران، خیابان شهید لواسانی، جنب خیابان فربین، آمفیتئاتر پژوهشگاه دانشهای بنیادی
https://ipm.ac.ir/
اعتراض به دکتر سید سجاد رضوی
معاون درمان وزیر بهداشت
در مورد راهنمای تجویز متیلفنیدیت
بخشی از نامه که متن کامل آن فردا منتشر خواهد شد عبارت است از:
- روند تدوین، اصلاح و نهاییسازی راهنماهای تجویز داروها که از دوره پیش و ذیل آن معاونت آغاز شده دارای مشکلات اساسی است
- اختلال بیشفعالی-کمتوجهی، یک اختلال پیچیدهی روانپزشکی است که تشخیص دقیق و درمان اثربخش آن به تخصص و تجربه بالینی در روانپزشکی نیاز دارد که مشخ…
🔺گزارش میدانی-روایی «شرق» از سوءمصرف داروهای اعصاب و روان، فروش و بالا رفتن متقاضیان
🔺ویاس و ریتالین؛ از بازار سیاه تا نسخهفروشی
نیلوفرحامدی
🔹در کمتر از 10 دقیقه میتوان به انواع و اقسام داروهای اعصاب و روان دسترسی پیدا کرد. در ناصرخسرو همه زمزمه میکنند: ویاس، ریتالین، دیازپام، زولپیدوم، میدازولام و... از ورقی ۲ تا ۵ میلیون تومان
یک جهش شیمیایی پیچیده و سریع؛ توده سفید و متراکم به معده میرسد و تمام بدن را به کار …
👌3😱1
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @psychiatrists. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,112,072 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“روانپزشکان” (@psychiatrists), 1,512 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psychiatrists.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.