2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 627–629 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
28 Sept 2026, 16:22
628
no change
28 Sept 2026, 15:47
628
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 8 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
36.6%
avg views ÷ 628 subscribers
Avg views / post
230
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026
Posts held
20 (8 August 2025 – 22 September 2026)
Views total
460
Reactions total
10
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Sept 2026, 16:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
188
Videos
13
Links
32
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
246 reactions across 19 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
105
42.7%
🔥
81
32.9%
👍
27
11.0%
😁
13
5.28%
💯
7
2.85%
❤🔥
4
1.63%
🥰
3
1.22%
👨💻
2
0.813%
🤡
2
0.813%
🌭
1
0.407%
🤔
1
0.407%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 246 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2025 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Часто ми називаємо це коханням. А насправді — це залежність, яка маскується під нього.
Емоційна залежність у стосунках не виникає раптово. Вона проходить через кілька етапів, і розуміння цієї динаміки — перший крок до того, щоб вчасно помітити тривожні дзвіночки.
🔹 1. Внутрішня порожнеча
Ще до стосунків. Незадоволені емоційні потреби, старі травми і дефіцит підтримки формують усередині «яму», яку хочеться кимось запо…
https://youtu.be/4ijrNU3F7aM
Тема тижня: Співзалежні стосунки 🤔
Привіт, мої любі! 👋
Сьогодні у своєму новому відео я торкнулася дуже болючої, але важливої теми. Я розмірковувала про те, як батьки, щиро бажаючи "не виростити тютю"( вибачте за цей сленг, але він дуже влучно описує суть), насправді створюють людину, схильну до емоційно-залежних стосунків.
Я знайшла неймовірно глибоку статтю про співзалежність і хочу п…
Друзі, привіт. Чи хотіли б ви серію постів про самодопомогу в стресових ситуаціях? Або декілька постів про ознаки наркотичного/алкогольного сп'яніння?
🤔 Чи може запропонуєте свою думку в коментарях? ⬇️
Як говорити про свої емоції щоб тебе почули?
👉 Ситуація: Після важкого дня ви йому знесилено кажете: «Я втомилась від тебе, від роботи, від всього…», і очікуєте розуміння як вам важко. В душі у вас надія, що він відповість:
«Я щось не так роблю? Тобі важко? Тобі треба побути на самоті? Як тобі допомогти? »
А він каже: «Та ти постійно така “втомлена”. При чому тут я?»
І стає ще більш болісніше. Бо замість підтримки – …
Всім привіт 👋
Давно ми не спілкувались, та і я якось давно не чергував) Тому відкритий до бесіди - задавайте будь-які питання лікарю-психіатру, і я відповім на них в коментах ⬇️
«Хто у дорослому житті краще будує стосунки: той, хто ріс у токсичній сім’ї й бачив сварки… чи той, кого оточували любов і підтримка?»
💡 «З одного боку, діти з люблячих сімей мають здорову модель і більше довіри.
А з іншого - ті, хто виріс у токсичному середовищі, швидше вчаться помічати “червоні прапорці” і кажуть собі: “Я хочу інакше, ніж було у моїх батьків”».
⚖️ «Але тут є нюанс: щоб вирватися з дитячих сценарі…
Як вам ідея замість «я помилився» вживати «Я оновив свій погляд»?
Наприклад:
«Я був певен, що ця кава в кав’ярні огидна. Вчора спробував інший сорт і оновив свій погляд».
Відчуваєте, як по іншому заграло сприйняття помилки? Що тут відбувається з нашою психологією?
1. Коли ми кажемо «я помилився», у багатьох запускається внутрішній критик: сором, самозвинувачення, відчуття слабкості.
2. Фраза «я оновив свій погляд» …
🔥12👍6🤡1
Signed Любов Дробишенець
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @psychiatrist_liubov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Перед оглядом психіатра вам хтось казав на всі питання психіатра казати "Ні"?
Казали8%
Не казали56%
"Ні"36%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2025 to 22 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@psychiatrist_liubov named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@ifjlgvmjyhe6773 named in 1 post, 29 September 2026 – 29 September 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
🇷🇺🇷🇺 НОВОСТИ РОССИИ СВО🇷🇺🇷🇺 Военные сводки🇷🇺🇷🇺 @Ruslan_70rus · 21,229 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 28 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Любов Дробишенець| Про психічне здоров'я та психічні розлади” (@psychiatrist_liubov), 628 subscribers as measured 28 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psychiatrist_liubov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
