И кофе мне сделай! Пошустрее!😑
❤11custom 52581969829539639718custom 54724068146896233665⚡1

Channel
@psychevarnya
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
122subscribers
+45 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003622993286 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @psychevarnya |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/psychevarnya |
Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 26 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Sept 2026, 03:56 | 122 | +10 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 17:01 | 112 | +9 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 15:46 | 103 | +8 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:26 | 95 | +7 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:57 | 88 | +11 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:32 | 77 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:33 | 77 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
277 reactions across 13 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 102 | 36.8% | |
| ⚡ | 30 | 10.8% | |
| custom 5258512967992900237 | 26 | 9.39% | |
| custom 5474205452503906347 | 25 | 9.03% | |
| custom 5471883305420879291 | 18 | 6.50% | |
| custom 5257965419792205499 | 14 | 5.05% | |
| custom 5258083501328070294 | 10 | 3.61% | |
| 💘 | 10 | 3.61% | |
| custom 5258196982953963971 | 8 | 2.89% | |
| custom 5472406814689623366 | 8 | 2.89% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 2.89% | |
| ❤🔥 | 7 | 2.53% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 1.44% | |
| 🍌 | 3 | 1.08% | |
| custom 5474277083968469433 | 2 | 0.722% | |
| custom 5471919842707665793 | 1 | 0.361% | |
| 💋 | 1 | 0.361% |
Custom emoji. 9 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 277 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
И кофе мне сделай! Пошустрее!😑
❤11custom 52581969829539639718custom 54724068146896233665⚡1
Есть тут рисующие в традишке? Срочно показываем оформление своих скетчбуков/блокнотов в комментариях! Начну со своего нынешнего - в оформлении концепт умеренности мне не знаком
❤7⚡2
Участвую в вк в сломанном планшете) Вижу в рефе исключительно капибару,которую несет орел🍾 А что увидели вы?)) Накидывайте варики в комменты
custom 525796541979220549912❤3⚡2custom 52585129679929002372🍌1custom 54742054525039063471
Бдыщь! Ловите спидпэинт🏄♂️Я тот самый динозаур,который сначала скетчит людей в традишке,а потом тащит скетчи в дидж)) @polinajunk я пыталась вставить твой супер трек в видос,но он в формате ogg( А мне стало лень возиться с конвертацией,поэтому я приняла волевое решение остановиться на незыблемой классике
❤10custom 54724068146896233663
ПСЫЧЕВАРНЯ pinned a photo
Хотите спидпэинты на Хаммеса Литтера?🐔
The shares total 122%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❤5⚡2custom 54742770839684694332
Не расстраиваем Оззичку,он очень переживает за успех мероприятия
custom 547420545250390634714custom 52585129679929002379custom 52580835013280702944⚡3❤1
Итак,создаем с вами алкогольную феечку! Вы можете писать неограниченное количество пунктов,по итогу я постараюсь взять от каждого по кусочку на свой вкус. Итоги буду подводить в следующий понедельник,10го августа🦋🤗
custom 525851296799290023714❤8⚡3custom 54742054525039063471
Фея будет сегодня вечером🏃♂️
❤8⚡2custom 52579654197922054992
АААААААА🌈
❤18custom 54742054525039063479custom 52580835013280702945⚡1💘1custom 52585129679929002371
🔟❤ и я выкатываю лист с пунктами про фею-алкогольвицу
❤16❤🔥6💘6⚡1
Карта перса в хорошем качестве
⚡7💘1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @psychevarnya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Хотите спидпэинты на Хаммеса Литтера?🐔
The shares total 122%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 9 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ПСЫЧЕВАРНЯ” (@psychevarnya), 122 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psychevarnya.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.