Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Психологический дайджест

@psychdigest

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

135subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001537061316
TypeChannel
Username@psychdigest
DescriptionУчусь и делюсь 🎓 Канал молодого специалиста о ментальном здоровье. Онлайн-консультация: 5300 рублей. ОГРНИП: 325028000168010
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/psychdigest

Growth

1357 August 2026 — 135 subscribers8 August 2026 — 135 subscribers7 August 20268 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 134–136 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 23:46135no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:37135first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 3 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
43
Videos
4
Links
26

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
30s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

103 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7875.7%
🔥98.74%
👍65.83%
🥰65.83%
😱32.91%
🤩10.971%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 103reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 3 March 2026 to 22 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Jun 2026, 14:11 UTC88 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Верите ли вы в карму? Карма — идея из дхармических традиций (индуизм, буддизм, джайнизм): наши поступки определяют то, что с нами случится, в этой жизни или следующих. Доказать или опровергнуть карму нельзя. Но можно изучать, как сама вера в неё влияет на людей. Мне попался свежий (относительно) обзор исследований в Trends in Cognitive Sciences. Главный вывод: вера в карму работает в обе стороны. ➕Плюсы. Вера в кар

9

7 Jun 2026, 09:22 UTC124 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Прокрастинируя подготовку к экзаменам ☁️

11🔥4🥰2

18 May 2026, 11:11 UTC184 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @clinic_neformatPhoto

Вы сидите и слушаете получасовую «лекцию» о способах выращивания грибов или правилах настольной игры. Вы устали, потеряли суть, а собеседник так поглощен рассказом, что даже не замечает ваших невербальных намеков🙂 Окружающим это часто кажется навязчивым, но внутри нейроотличного комьюнити (особенно среди людей с РАС) для этого явления появилось свое название — инфодампинг. Наш психиатр и психотерапевт Анастасия Абдр

9

10 May 2026, 12:10 UTC172 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Интересную новость увидела на просторах интернетов: «У двадцатилетней женщины развилась зависимость от искусственного интеллекта, который стал ее единственным другом - молодая женщина ведет диалог только с алгоритмом, избегая общения с людьми». Для уточнения: не являюсь противником искусственного интеллекта. Мне нравится отношение к этому как к внешней силе (как, например, машина или строительный кран), которая може

8👍3😱3🔥1

15 Mar 2026, 16:01 UTC213 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

У нас сегодня туманы и настроение-кино 🌸

16🥰4🔥3

13 Mar 2026, 11:50 UTC210 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Можно ли переписать прошлое? В психотерапии мы часто к прошлому возвращаемся. Изменить его нельзя, но в некоторых практиках происходит очень важный процесс: изменение уже сформированных эмоциональных воспоминаний. Как это возможно? Долгое время считалось, что воспоминания после консолидации становятся стабильными и неизменными.Но исследования начала 2000-х показали: каждый раз, когда воспоминание активируется, оно

12

9 Mar 2026, 09:59 UTC186 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Вот этот вот курс «Системы обработки информации в нейронауках» был тем, что я искала в магистратуре. Некоторый микс между информатикой и биологией. Очень непонятно. Сложно. И неприятно во всём это разбираться, когда ощущения от возможностей своего мозга приближаются к нулю (посттравматическое после пар по математике и физике в медицинском). Но, с другой стороны, именно это направление стало основой создания нейрочи

5

3 Mar 2026, 09:13 UTC197 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

В непростые времена небольшое напоминание 🌟Первое, что делает мозг в ситуациях неопределённости: пытается найти больше информации. В современнном мире с бесконечным потоком новостей это превращается в думскроллинг (компульсивное, бесконечное пролистывание новостных лент с негативным контентом, несмотря на ухудшение ментального состояния). 🌟Простые рекомендации, чтобы оставаться в повестке, но не уйти в тревогу: чте

8👍3🔥1🤩1

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @psychdigest. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Психологический дайджест” (@psychdigest), 135 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psychdigest.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.