Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Anastasia Kazantceva psychology

Channel

Anastasia Kazantceva psychology

@psychasya

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

525subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002081593670
TypeChannel
Username@psychasya
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/psychasya

Growth

5255315287 August 2026 — 531 subscribers8 August 2026 — 531 subscribers16 August 2026 — 527 subscribers24 August 2026 — 525 subscribers7 August 202624 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 16 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 524–532 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 01:55525-2
16 Aug 2026, 18:07527-4
8 Aug 2026, 03:50531no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:56531first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9m 25s
Average length
57s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

97 reactions across 17 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3536.1%
👍2929.9%
💯66.19%
👌44.12%
👏33.09%
🔥33.09%
🙏33.09%
💔22.06%
😁22.06%
😍22.06%
🥰22.06%
11.03%
🤔11.03%
🤝11.03%
🤨11.03%
🤷‍♀11.03%
🥴11.03%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 97reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 January 2026 to 10 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Feb 2026, 15:01 UTC239 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Удобная женщина = диагноз. Не забудь поделиться с друзьями 😉

👍3👌1💯1😍1

9 Feb 2026, 11:56 UTC226 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Парапапам-пу 🤡 Или как они это делают? Пишите комментарии 🫶🏼

👏21🤔1😁1

5 Feb 2026, 11:36 UTC209 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

А что реально делать, если Вам изменили? Простили бы вы измену? Пишите комментарии⬇️

💔21🤷‍♀1

4 Feb 2026, 14:07 UTC167 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

«Темная психология» Ампутация ног или как женщину посадить «дома»❗️ ⬇️ 👍

2👍1💯1

3 Feb 2026, 14:13 UTC146 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Алкоголь 🥃 Ошибка или скрытое желание❓

👍4👏1💯1

3 Feb 2026, 07:46 UTC132 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

И таких женщин миллионы, которые сталкиваются с подобным отношением от мужа… Буду рада вашим реакциям 😉

5🔥2🥰1🥴1

2 Feb 2026, 08:48 UTC121 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Пишите свои комментарии, так это ли нет? 20 реакций и я расскажу, что комментаторы пишут на эту тему 😉

👍42👌1🤝1

1 Feb 2026, 10:02 UTC120 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

〽️Кричим в пустоту: Почему мы одиноки в эпоху гиперсвязи и как это исправить? Парадокс: у нас больше «друзей» в соцсетях, чем когда-либо, но мы называем это время эпидемией одиночества. Это не просто грусть. Это глубокое чувство ненужности, невидимости и разобщенности. Почему так и что с этим делать? Не цифры, а качество. Одиночество — это не про количество контактов в телефоне. Это про отсутствие значимых, глубоки

4👍2💯1

29 Jan 2026, 06:47 UTC118 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Вы знаете, что я обрела после таких видео на 💵? Хейтеров, да-да! Это настоящий клад! Мужчины, не согласны и воюют на поле с комментариями, иногда переходя на личность. Я вот , что думаю, что как же тяжело в современном мире, женщине встретить мужчину…. Как считаете?

👍43😁1

22 Jan 2026, 14:15 UTC145 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Как нас раскалывают: Психология манипуляций Почему общество делится на враждебные лагеря? Всё сводится к простым психологическим приёмам, которые бьют по нашим слабостям. 🚩Главные крючки: 🚩«Свои vs Чужие». Самый древний триггер. Противник перестаёт быть человеком, превращаясь во «врага», «ватника» или «либераста». 🚩 Эмоции > Факты. Гнев и страх распространяются быстрее правды. Видели яростный пост, который задел з

3👍3😍1

21 Jan 2026, 10:41 UTC143 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔴Этот тренд, получивший название «2026 — это новый 2016», стал по-настоящему виральным в начале этого года. Люди массово публикуют свои архивные фото, используют старые фильтры и музыку десятилетней давности. Вот основные причины, почему это происходит именно сейчас: 1️⃣Цикличная ностальгия (Правило 10 лет) В массовой культуре существует «цикл ностальгии»: каждые 10 лет мы начинаем тосковать по эпохе, которая была

👍31💯1

20 Jan 2026, 11:13 UTC112 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Должна ли женщина отдавать долги мужу во время декрета?

  1. Это честно жить 50/5014%
  2. Мужчина должен содержать во время декрета86%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @psychasya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

20 Jan 2026, 11:13 UTCAnonymous Poll14 voters

Должна ли женщина отдавать долги мужу во время декрета?

  1. Это честно жить 50/5014%
  2. Мужчина должен содержать во время декрета86%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

15 Jan 2026, 12:44 UTCAnonymous Poll19 voters

Можно ли простить женщине 9 месяцев переписки с другим

  1. Можно 😌42%
  2. Послать её на..р❌58%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

14 Jan 2026, 09:50 UTCAnonymous Poll23 voters

Можно ли прощать мужчине: публичное оскорбление, обесценивание, газлайтинг, равнодушие, сравнение с другими женщинами, финансовые подавление?

  1. Конечно, нет ❌78%
  2. Прощала, не раз…22%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 January 2026 to 10 February 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Психология
@psyxo1 · 116,147
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Anastasia Kazantceva psychology” (@psychasya), 525 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psychasya.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.