Channel
@psy_with_lyubov
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
61subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001437505695 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @psy_with_lyubov |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/psy_with_lyubov |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 16:19 | 61 | +2 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 16:58 | 59 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 22:07 | 58 | +2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 15:30 | 56 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
54 reactions across 14 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 26 | 48.1% | |
| 🎉 | 4 | 7.41% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 7.41% | |
| 💔 | 4 | 7.41% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 5.56% | |
| 🤩 | 3 | 5.56% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 3.70% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 3.70% | |
| 🦄 | 2 | 3.70% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 1.85% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 1.85% | |
| 🤗 | 1 | 1.85% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.85% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 54 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Что вы чаще всего делаете, когда сильно злитесь?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Скорая помощь при гневе В прошлом посте мы выяснили, что гнев — это не признак скверного характера, а важнейший сигнал психики: «Мои границы нарушают, мне это не подходит!». Но одно дело — понимать это в теории, и совсем другое — когда пульс уже стучит в висках, внутри всё закипает, и хочется либо накричать, либо хлопнуть дверью. Пытаться в эту секунду уговорить себя успокоиться не сработает. При гневе выбрасывает…
🔥2❤1
Доброго воскресного утра 🌞
❤5
Подавлять эмоции — не выход ⚡️ Наши эмоции и чувства даны нам природой, это не сбои в системе и не враги, которые мешают жить. Эволюция задумала их как важнейшие сигналы, которые психика подает телу. Как боль в руке сигнализирует о переломе кости, так и любая, даже самая неприятная эмоция, сообщает о нашей глубинной потребности. За годы практики я часто вижу одно и то же: безрезультатные попытки игнорировать или п…
❤2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤2
Смотрите, как щедр и плодороден мир вокруг. Природа не прячет свои плоды, не сдерживает свой рост! 🌿 Принимайте, впитывайте эту красоту и изобилие! А совсем скоро мы поговорим о том, чему и почему нам стоит поучиться у природы. Я готовлю новую тему про наши эмоции: зачем они нужны, какую силу в себе несут и почему подавлять их — значит лишать себя жизни. Желаю всем теплых и спокойных выходных! Покидайте в коммента…
🤩3❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
😍2
Запись нашей живой встречи про отношения🤍 На днях мы завершили наш большой цикл постов об отношениях живым эфиром в Zoom. Нас было немного, и благодаря этому разговор получился очень камерным, искренним и безопасным. Я хочу сказать огромное спасибо всем участницам, которые пришли на встречу, не побоялись задать свои вопросы и поделились самым сокровенным. ❤️ Благодаря вам этот разговор получился таким глубоким и от…
❤5🙏2🔥1
Сегодня в 19:30 по московскому времени жду всех в Zoom на встречу Вопрос-ответ! Все, что вы хотели бы спросить относительно ОТНОШЕНИЙ, приносите на встречу. Ссылка 👇🏻 ПОДКЛЮЧИТЬСЯ
👌1
Итак, встречаемся с вами завтра 22 июля в 19:30 по московскому время в Zoom на живую встречу Вопрос-ответ. Ссылку выложу здесь в канале за 15 минут до встречи! Ставьте напоминание и готовьте свои вопросы по теме отношений! Ваша Любовь
🎉4
Приду на встречу Вопрос-ответ
The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
По итогам голосования, вижу вашу потребность в живой встречи. Отлично! Тогда давайте выберем время. Проголосуйте теперь, пожалуйста, в опросе ниже - какой из временных слотов вам будет удобен?
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @psy_with_lyubov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Что вы чаще всего делаете, когда сильно злитесь?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Приду на встречу Вопрос-ответ
The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Живая встреча в Zoom
The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 10 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Психология с Любовью ❤️” (@psy_with_lyubov), 61 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psy_with_lyubov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.