Channel
@psy_lit_prosvet
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
437subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001963855471 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @psy_lit_prosvet |
| Description | Искусство и культура глазами психиатра https://youtube.com/@Psy_Lit_Prosvet На канале выходят посты на самые разные темы, связанные с психиатрией, психологией и культурой. Хэштеги: https://t.me/psy_lit_prosvet/52 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/psy_lit_prosvet |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:16 | 437 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:28 | 437 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 1 May 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 November 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
257 reactions across 16 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 49 | 19.1% | |
| 😁 | 48 | 18.7% | |
| 🔥 | 38 | 14.8% | |
| 👍 | 35 | 13.6% | |
| 👏 | 26 | 10.1% | |
| 🤣 | 13 | 5.06% | |
| 🐳 | 9 | 3.50% | |
| 🤔 | 8 | 3.11% | |
| 🤯 | 5 | 1.95% | |
| 💅 | 4 | 1.56% | |
| 👨💻 | 3 | 1.17% | |
| 😨 | 3 | 1.17% | |
| 😭 | 3 | 1.17% | |
| 🫡 | 3 | 1.17% | |
| 👾 | 2 | 0.778% | |
| 😎 | 2 | 0.778% | |
| 🍌 | 1 | 0.389% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.389% | |
| 👻 | 1 | 0.389% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 0.389% | |
| 2 further kinds | 2 | 0.778% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 257reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 1 May 2024 to 27 November 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
"Что такое знаменитость? Человек, которого все знают по фамилии, и потому имя его не имеет значения." Зигмунд Айрапетов Альбер Камю — французский писатель, философ-экзистенциалист (1913 — 1960). #популярная_психология
😁12💅4🖕1
👩💻Тот случай, когда Ютуб предлагает действительно годный контент. Если моя критика позиции Алипова по большей части опиралась на клинический опыт и банальный здравый смысл (фу, как можно, это же логическая ошибка и когнитивные искажения), то автор ролика апеллирует как раз к статистическим данным. Однозначно рекомендую к просмотру, а автору желаю всяческих успехов на блогерском поприще. https://youtu.be/t0mSRwIbghs?…
👍11🔥5❤1💩1
🧬Стрим сегодня в 19-00! Ютуб:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A3-3BCEpGsI Твич: https://www.twitch.tv/psy_lit_prosvet Группа ВК:https://vk.com/psy_lit_prosvet
❤9👌1
🧨В ближайшее время будет стрим с разбором дебатов о антидепрессантах. В связи с замедлением Ютуба, советую подписаться на другие площадки для трансляций. Группа ВК:https://vk.com/psy_lit_prosvet Твич: http://m.twitch.tv/psy_lit_prosvet Стрим на Ютубе тоже будет.
❤15🔥5👏3
Внезапный будничный стрим! Ютуб: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9KzN-XQ4mLw Твич: https://www.twitch.tv/psy_lit_prosvet
🐳8❤6
🥁Cтрим сегодня в 19-00! Попробуем новый формат с просмотром заказанных роликов. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_IxCCSrg-I
❤11😎2🥰1
Гамлет, принц инцельский В продолжение темы проекций. #контент_мейкеры
🤣13🍌1🐳1😁1
Рецензия №1: Дмитрий Быков (признан иноагентом в РФ). Аудиолекция к «Палате№6». Рецензия№2: Владимир Набоков. «Лекции по русской литературе».
🔥10🤯4🫡1
Глаза смотрящего Учитывая нынешнюю вульгаризацию популяризацию психологии, наверняка многие слышали о проекции – приписывании собственных чувств, мыслей или мотивов внешним объектам. Несмотря на кажущуюся простоту определения, роль этого феномена в нашей жизни не так уж и проста. С одной стороны, проекция считается защитным механизмом психики, избавляющим самую неистовую ханжу от негативных эмоций и ответственности…
🤔8🔥3❤1
⚡️В сеть утекли кадры со съёмок третьей части "Дюны"! #мем
😁19👍2👻1😨1
Photo, posted without a caption
😁14👨💻3😭3
🚀Стрим сегодня в 19-00! Ютуб: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X8duaNlOW0Q Твич: https://www.twitch.tv/psy_lit_prosvet
❤5😨2🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @psy_lit_prosvet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ПсихЛитПросвет” (@psy_lit_prosvet), 437 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psy_lit_prosvet.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.