Posted without readable text
❤10❤🔥1😍1
Signed Yana Doronina

Channel
@psy_doronina_yana
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
362subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001646512503 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @psy_doronina_yana |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/psy_doronina_yana |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 19:39 | 362 | +1 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 18:15 | 361 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 14:26 | 362 | -2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 14:08 | 364 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:13 | 363 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:31 | 365 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:24 | 365 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 11 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
124 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 87 | 70.2% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 8.06% | |
| ❤🔥 | 7 | 5.65% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 4.84% | |
| 😍 | 4 | 3.23% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 3.23% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 2.42% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 1.61% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 0.806% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 124 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 11 April 2026 to 22 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Posted without readable text
❤10❤🔥1😍1
Signed Yana Doronina
Если бы рядом оказался человек, который чувствует себя так же, как ты сейчас, что бы ты ему сказала? Этот вопрос кажется простым, но именно он очень часто показывает, насколько по-разному мы относимся к другим людям и к самим себе. В гештальт-терапии есть важная идея: человек часто оказывается разделён между двумя частями. Одна часть чувствует, переживает и нуждается в поддержке, а другая оценивает, критикует и тре…
❤8
Signed Yana Doronina
Сегодня радую своих любимок красивым видом 🩷
❤11🔥3🥰3
Signed Yana Doronina
Мне кажется, одна из самых больших иллюзий в отношениях — это поиск идеального человека. Того, который никогда не будет раздражать, всегда будет понимать без слов, совпадать с нами во взглядах, привычках, желаниях и потребностях. Но чем дольше я работаю с людьми, тем больше убеждаюсь: счастливые отношения строятся не там, где удалось найти идеального партнёра, а там, где человек перестал искать совершенство и научил…
❤13🔥4👏2
Signed Yana Doronina
Опрос. Ответы анонимные Есть ли проблемы (кто в отношениях)?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Yana Doronina
Опрос. Ответы анонимные Кто находится в отношениях?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Yana Doronina
Можно ли научиться любить себя? Честно? Я не очень люблю эту фразу, потому что для многих она звучит как что-то абстрактное и недостижимое. Особенно когда внутри много тревоги, самокритики и привычки жить через чужое одобрение. И, наверное, любовь к себе это не про бесконечное восхищение собой в зеркале и не про состояние «я всегда собой довольна». Живые люди так не функционируют… Скорее это про способность не пре…
❤4❤🔥1😍1
Signed Yana Doronina
Мы смотрим на чей-то результат, красивую жизнь, отношения, деньги, внешность, реализацию… и почти никогда не видим за этим количество тревоги, провалов, бессонных ночей, внутренней борьбы, страха и моментов, где человек сам не верил в себя. Зато своё закулисье мы знаем прекрасно 👍 1. Все свои сомнения. 2. Все ошибки. 3. Все моменты, где хотелось всё бросить. 4. Все страхи, неуверенность и ощущение «я недостаточно».…
❤4❤🔥1💯1
Signed Yana Doronina
На след неделе запись есть только в пн, вт и ср. с 14 по 17 приемов нет
Signed Yana Doronina
Могу взять в работу новеньких. Дни и часы для приема: Пн-пт с 12:00-17:00 Утреннее и вечернее время обсуждается отдельно
Signed Yana Doronina
Ожидание «МУЖА» в начале отношений при собственной эмоциональной дистанции создаёт разрыв между запросом на близость и готовностью к ней, и именно это, а не «не те мужчины», чаще всего мешает отношениям углубляться. Я очень часто слышу, как женщины говорят о желании семьи, и, что интересно, мужчины говорят об этом не реже, однако в реальности между этим желанием и тем, как выстраиваются отношения, довольно быстро по…
❤6👍1👏1💯1
Signed Yana Doronina
В отношениях мы постоянно учимся понимать друг друга, и этот процесс по своей природе не имеет финальной точки, как бы ни хотелось однажды прийти к полному и безусловному совпадению 🩷 Нам часто хочется, чтобы всё стало ясно сразу, чтобы любовь складывалась легко, без недопониманий и столкновений, будто возможно встретить человека, который изначально во всём совпадает с нами. Но если в начале возникает ощущение абсо…
❤7
Signed Yana Doronina
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @psy_doronina_yana. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Опрос. Ответы анонимные Есть ли проблемы (кто в отношениях)?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Опрос. Ответы анонимные Кто находится в отношениях?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Мне нужна ваша подсказка: Делаю группу в ВК? Буду дублировать всё, что выкладываю сюда
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 11 April 2026 to 22 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ПСИХОЛОГ Доронина Яна” (@psy_doronina_yana), 362 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psy_doronina_yana.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.