Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 28 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
4 measurements spanning 54 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 70–72 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
30 Sept 2026, 13:16
72
+1
29 Aug 2026, 17:58
71
+1
10 Aug 2026, 00:00
70
no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:08
70
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 4 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
84 reactions across 14 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
33
39.3%
👍
15
17.9%
🔥
11
13.1%
custom 5350632191061678353
7
8.33%
custom 5440392046860856689
5
5.95%
custom 5406935677554170016
3
3.57%
custom 5467888547748931265
3
3.57%
custom 5442636661194253587
2
2.38%
custom 5460993759439236880
2
2.38%
custom 5253458306881580856
1
1.19%
😢
1
1.19%
😱
1
1.19%
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 84 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 4 March 2026 to 31 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 19 we hold a reading for · 26%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @psy_dialogues. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 March 2026 to 31 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Вопрос: я в отношениях, где я не важна;
💗привычка быть не важной;
💗с кем я делила любовь мамы/папы в детстве;
💗комплекс Эдипа/ Электры;
Что почитать из прошлого материала:
✈️ понять, что я чувствую в этой ситуации; (техника)
✈️комплекс Эдипа/ Электры:
🩵часть 1 (читать)
🩵часть 2 (читать)
🩵подкаст, где затронута эта тема;
#psy_dialogues_принятиесебя
Вопрос: муж распределяет деньги, я выпрашиваю. О чем это про нас?
🤩деньги никогда не просто деньги;
🤩обесценивание ценного вклада партнера, который не зарабатывает;
🤩неравность отношений;
🤩привычка партнера быть неважной(-ым);
🤩нарушение иерархии семьи: «вымещение» на детях;
🤩увеличение дистанции между партнерами;
🤩парадокс системы;
Что можно почитать из прошлого:
🤩 круги близости; (слушать)
🤩 ретрофлексия; (читать…
🌿Про отпуск…🌿
…и не только…
Вернувшись, я с удивлением заметила, что хочется поделиться не отпуском, яркими красочными фотографиями, а… тем, что так радостно читать бумажную книгу🩷
В связи с этим хочу оставить здесь 2 тезиса про опору внутри:
🔹опора внутри дает ощущение себя в любой среде;
🔹имея себя можно не присоединяться из лояльности к теме бедности, страдания, одиночества, … (любой другой, ниже раскрою чуть ши…
Друзья, эта неделя - у меня отпуск. 🩷🦈
Мы в феврале говорили о ресурсе и я писала (здесь), что научилась переключаться: время с собой - время с сыном - время с мужем - работа - занятие телом…
Поэтому в отпуске хочу быть только в отпуске🥰
Еще остались некоторые вопросы не отвеченные - отвечу на следующей неделе, кому-то ответила в личные сообщения (кто и задал их в личные, а не через бот).
Хочу передать свою поддерж…
Вопрос: как помочь себе сказать маме правду?
🤍важность и нормальность запроса;
💚Техника, помогающая увидеть скрытые эмоции;
💚зрелость <> «черное или белое», а оттенки;
🤍дети и девиантное поведение в разрезе привязанности;
{если хотите фильм и его обсуждение, напишите в комментариях}
💚»желание сказать» как запрос на принятие;
💚3 пункта, как себе помочь;
🤍крайняя важность внутренней опоры;
💚шанс вывести отношения на но…
Друзья, кто пропустил, тут можно задать вопрос об отношениях.
Изначально, мне хотелось бы поговорить про партнерские отношения между мужем и женой, если получается остаться в этой парадигме - супер;
Я вижу вопросы, также те, которые не через бот, отвечаю по порядку поступления вопросов 🙏🏻
💞 Вопрос: как принять мужа без вреда для своего здоровья?
💞внутренний конфликт в запросе;
💞психосоматика при попытках «договориться с собой», оставаясь удобной;
💞немного о муже;
💞паттерн взаимодействия;
#psy_dialogues_отношения
Добрый день,
Очень важный вопрос, который не «про сестер», а про близость, место в системе, желание быть в контакте…
Подумайте о следующих темах:
💛эти переживания «невозможность наладить контакт с одной сестрой» и «невозможность получить достаточное количество тепла от другой» - это к кому переживания? Где раньше мне не хватало тепла? К кому раньше я не могла достучаться?
💚очень часто динамика между сиблингами про в…
👍2❤1custom 54426366611942535871
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @psy_dialogues. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Этот «тип» всем демонстрирует «мне никто не нужен» и даже сам верит в это, но внутри очень нуждается в близости
Тревожный7%
Избегающий73%
Надежный0%
Дезорганизованный20%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 4 March 2026 to 31 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Psy.Диалоги с Александрой Гладилиной” (@psy_dialogues), 72 subscribers as measured 30 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psy_dialogues.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.