Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ПКК: Повод остаться дома

Channel

ПКК: Повод остаться дома

@psy_bookclub

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

64subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004211306950
TypeChannel
Username@psy_bookclub
CreatedBetween 1 May 2026 and 1 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/psy_bookclub

Growth

6365647 August 2026 — 63 subscribers10 August 2026 — 63 subscribers22 August 2026 — 65 subscribers30 August 2026 — 64 subscribers7 August 202630 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 23 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 63–65 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 15:1364-1
22 Aug 2026, 16:5465+2
10 Aug 2026, 03:1663no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:1863first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 1 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

21 reactions across 6 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
21100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 06:46 UTC30 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Почему я всем советую «Мою гениальную подругу»: 📍Эта книга очень легко читается, невозможно оторваться, при этом поднимает очень непростые темы и показывает, в том числе, те стороны жизни, на которые не хочется смотреть 📍Это редчайшее в литературе исследование женской дружбы со всеми ее неприглядными сторонами 📍Действие происходит в Италии, поэтому это идеальный, на мой взгляд, выбор для летнего чтения 📍Книга зан

1

1 Aug 2026, 17:06 UTC46 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Книга августа — "Моя гениальная подруга". Почему я всем советую ее прочитать, напишу на днях, а пока анонс для тех, кто уже знает про нее и хочет обсудить: встречаемся 24 августа (понедельник) в 19:00 онлайн. Для записи: @ksenia_malanova ❤️

27 Jul 2026, 19:07 UTC71 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Обсудили сегодня с участницами "Доверие" 🤍 На этой волне хочется поделиться своей любимой цитатой и иллюстрацией, которая, как мне кажется, очень подходит к книге. Мы дошли до точки в 1926-м. Тогда я считала, что это конец нашего брака. Со временем я поняла, что только тогда он по-настоящему начался. Ибо пришла к выводу, что настоящее супружество начинается тогда, когда человек становится более предан своим клятвам,

3

20 Jul 2026, 12:29 UTC71 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Обложки "Доверия" в разных странах. Встречаемся на обсуждение книги ровно через неделю, 27 июля в 19:00. Еще можно присоединиться: @ksenia_malanova ⭐ Какая вам больше всего нравится? Мне, пожалуй, немецкая (желтая с купюрами).

2

10 Jul 2026, 08:41 UTC79 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Как я себя ощущаю, когда сижу с книжкой на даче)) Автор картины — Peder Severin Krøyer 🤍

4

9 Jul 2026, 06:47 UTC79 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

«Вы читаете о чем-то, что, как вы думали, происходило только с вами, и вот выясняется, что это же случилось с Достоевским сто лет назад. Какое же это величайшее освобождение для переживающего не лучшие времена человека, уверенного, что он одинок в своем страдании. Вот в чем подлинная ценность искусства» — слова Джеймса Болдуина, цитата из книги «Экслибрис. Лучшие книги современности». Автор коллажа Valentina Cozzi 🖤

5

8 Jul 2026, 06:47 UTC77 viewsread 10 August 2026
Poll

Причины, которые останавливают от участия в книжном клубе

  1. Не подходит время15%
  2. Не цепляет книга месяца23%
  3. Нет финансовой возможности сейчас0%
  4. Нет времени на чтение15%
  5. Не знаю, как проходят такие встречи, поэтому сомневаюсь15%
  6. Меня ничего не останавливает, хочу посмотреть результаты38%
  7. Другое (можно написать в комменты или в личные сообщения каналу)0%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

4 Jul 2026, 10:28 UTC78 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Книга июля Продолжаем тему «ненадежных рассказчиков». В «Тайной истории» мы видели все события глазами Ричарда и на встречах часто говорили о том, что интересно, как же все было на самом деле. По словам Донны Тартт, в этом романе всё оказывается не тем, чем кажется на первый взгляд. А в июле мы читаем книгу, где одна и та же история рассказана четыре раза… и от этого она яснее не становится. Кому можно доверять? А

6

1 Jul 2026, 11:50 UTC71 viewsread 10 August 2026
Poll

Какая нравится больше?

  1. 1 — Gilles Sacksick20%
  2. 2 — Brunna Mancuso50%
  3. 3 — Monica Castanys10%
  4. 4 — Tutku10%
  5. 5 — Fumi Yanagimoto10%
  6. 6 — Не смогла найти автора, возможно, ИИ30%

The shares total 130%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @psy_bookclub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Jul 2026, 06:47 UTCAnonymous Poll13 voters

Причины, которые останавливают от участия в книжном клубе

  1. Не подходит время15%
  2. Не цепляет книга месяца23%
  3. Нет финансовой возможности сейчас0%
  4. Нет времени на чтение15%
  5. Не знаю, как проходят такие встречи, поэтому сомневаюсь15%
  6. Меня ничего не останавливает, хочу посмотреть результаты38%
  7. Другое (можно написать в комменты или в личные сообщения каналу)0%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

1 Jul 2026, 11:50 UTCFinal Results10 voters

Какая нравится больше?

  1. 1 — Gilles Sacksick20%
  2. 2 — Brunna Mancuso50%
  3. 3 — Monica Castanys10%
  4. 4 — Tutku10%
  5. 5 — Fumi Yanagimoto10%
  6. 6 — Не смогла найти автора, возможно, ИИ30%

The shares total 130%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ПКК: Повод остаться дома” (@psy_bookclub), 64 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psy_bookclub.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.