11 measurements spanning 11 days, net +28. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,322–13,408 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Aug 2026, 13:47
13,370
-9
16 Aug 2026, 05:05
13,379
-6
14 Aug 2026, 11:46
13,385
-13
12 Aug 2026, 23:55
13,398
+2
12 Aug 2026, 02:43
13,396
-1
11 Aug 2026, 02:11
13,397
+2
10 Aug 2026, 03:11
13,395
+10
9 Aug 2026, 06:41
13,385
+53
8 Aug 2026, 06:46
13,332
-8
7 Aug 2026, 06:08
13,340
-2
6 Aug 2026, 22:03
13,342
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.7%
avg views ÷ 13,370 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,560
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.01%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held
20 (24 July 2026 – 13 August 2026)
Views total
31,247
Reactions total
1,565
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Aug 2026, 11:39 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 14s
Average length
45s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,565 reactions across 20 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,172
74.9%
🔥
179
11.4%
💯
115
7.35%
👍
38
2.43%
💔
22
1.41%
👏
12
0.767%
😢
8
0.511%
😁
7
0.447%
🥰
4
0.256%
🍌
2
0.128%
🙏
2
0.128%
🤩
2
0.128%
😐
1
0.064%
🤔
1
0.064%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,565reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @psy_bez_popsy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2026 to 13 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Опасные связи 📹 (1988)
Это очень красивое кино о том, как страх уязвимости лишает нас близости и любви, а игры в эмоциональное превосходство всегда заканчиваются самоуничтожением.
Люди с выраженными чертами тёмной триады, как главные герои, производят очень сильное впечатление. Вот черты тёмной триады:
Макиавеллизм — склонность к манипуляциям, цинизму, холодному расчету и убеждению, что цель оправдывает средства.
…
💬 Как идёт поиск партнёра для жизни?
Читаю вопросы из анонимки.
Как в той песне: я привыкаю к несовпадениям. Ну а если серьёзно, то привыкла уже давно. Сейчас я просто живу и смотрю на жизнь.
Я устала не от одиночества, а от тщетности попыток и бесконечной череды несовпадений. Моё внимание переключилось на решение других задач. Работа требует гораздо больших усилий, чем раньше. Я понимаю, что мне нужно делать то, …
Когда любви недостаточно
Когда я смотрела фильм «Когда любви недостаточно» - внутри всё сжималось. Этот фильм зацепил меня своим названием, но я совершенно не знала о чём он. Его стоит посмотреть всем, чью жизнь навсегда изменил алкоголизм, в том числе и близкого человека.
За каждой бутылкой стоит боль и одиночество. Эта болезнь постепенно забирает человека целиком, а близкие часто реагируют только злостью, стыдом …
Психология - религия 21 века?
Увлечение психологией в последние годы приобрело масштаб культа. Но всё есть яд и всё есть лекарство. Психология - это инструмент и его можно использовать как во благо себе, так и во вред, прикрываясь терминами, как щитом от реальных отношений и избегая самой жизни.
Почему психология стала новой религией?
🔹Иллюзия контроля. Мир стал слишком непредсказуемым. Человек не может повлиять н…
Вы - предприниматель? Тогда это пост для вас!
Бизнес переживает нелёгкие времена: рост налоговой нагрузки, снижение рентабельности и спроса, подорожание логистики и аренды, на маркетплейсах грабительские комиссии. Многие оказались на грани разорения.
Если спрос на ваши услуги падают, сотрудники так и норовят отдохнуть в рабочее время, а клиенты покупают у конкурентов, то встаёт вопрос: что с этим делать?
Читайте к…
Дерьмо.
Японцы умеют снимать странное кино. Недавно я посмотрела фильм «Токио!» (2008), который состоит из трёх новелл, одна из которых называется «Дерьмо»
Главный герой вылезает из канализации, питается деньгами и хризантемами (символ власти и императорского дома), плюёт на правила поведения, а потом взрывает пол-Токио гранатами.
Увиденное вызывает только один вопрос: а что это было?!
Главный герой - это тень яп…
Саша, спасибо большое за сегодняшнюю встречу. Спасибо за глоток воздуха, за возможность быть, а не соответствовать, за возможность расслабиться в душевной компании. Я тот ещё дикарь и отшельник, а с вами смогла забыть про всё и отдохнуть. Я практически не пускаю людей в свою жизнь, а с вами понимаю, что это возможно. Девочки, вы супер.
Встреча в Москве прошла прекрасно! Вы замечательные! Спасибо всем, кто пришёл и сделал этот вечер тёплым ❤️ Улетела на Филиппины довольная и с подарками 🎁
Друзья, на канале я не делала анонс встречи, потому что места за столом ограничены. Это участники моего киноклуба 🍿 и я очень рада, что мы снова вместе! Это не просто работа, а целая часть моей жизни, моё творчество и отражение меня.
Привет с острова Панглао! 🇵🇭 …
Окрыляющий клубный вечер в Москве. И расслабляющий, и вдохновляющий и просто суперский!
Саша, спасибо, что встроили наши живые посиделки в ваш график. Ваша супер-сила (одна из супер-сил) – это особая способность гармонично совмещать в себе образ эксперта, наставника, терапевта и подруги, искреннего ранимого человека, незаурядной женщины. Каждый раз меня восхищают пришедшие на встречу девушки: с какой-то внутренней с…
- Бог признан виновным. И что нам теперь делать?
- Молиться.
Вчера я вела в киноклубе вебинар по мотивам «Суд над Богом» 📹 Весь фильм мы вместе с героями взвешивали добро и зло в бараке Освенцима. Бог признан виновным, но он не отвергнут, не перечёркнут. Герои всё равно остались с ним в отношениях.
Отношения. Это единственное на что мы можем опираться в самые трудные моменты жизни. Отношения с собой. Отношения с Др…
В последнее время я как-то устала от экспертного контента. Все чему-то учат, а хочется просто больше про жизнь.
Знакомьтесь — daria b. У неё даже купальник становится философией, а из разговора с редактором получается лучшая короткометражка недели. Дневник без концепции, без личного бренда, без контент-плана. Пишет про жизнь, думает вслух, попутно спрашивает, почему Бехтерев стоит 650 рублей, а поп-психология в розо…
Давно не было ваших вопросов. Раньше я делала из них контент и писала посты с ответом. Ваши вопросы - это готовая идея о чём писать на канале!
Оставьте мне любой вопрос:
t.me/voprosy?start=ggfl2pd
А ещё вы давно не видели 🐶Барни!
❤73👍7🔥3🤩2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @psy_bez_popsy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@psy_bez_popsy edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
13 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 368,935 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PSY.BEZ.POPSY” (@psy_bez_popsy), 13,370 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psy_bez_popsy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.