Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

" ͟𝗽͟͟𝗮͟𝗿͟𝗮͟𝗱𝗶𝘀𝗲 " 🩸 #кл

@psrabi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

145subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003805126205
TypeChannel
Username@psrabi
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/psrabi

Growth

1457 Aug 2026, 19:33 — 145 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 21:16 — 145 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 19:338 Aug 2026, 21:16
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 144–146 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 21:16145no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:33145first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
105.7%
avg views ÷ 145 subscribers
Avg views / post
153
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.56%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held20 (29 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total3,064
Reactions total193
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 21:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
45
Links
8

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

193 reactions across 19 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54630641999638984567237.3%
custom 52314151860987630562915.0%
custom 53326953510716468262915.0%
custom 53391611494578473342110.9%
custom 53778301187082321392010.4%
custom 5229148465568692186136.74%
custom 533276830538613882494.66%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 193reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 15:09 UTC29 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

— напоминаю про конкурс

custom 53391611494578473344custom 52291484655686921861

8 Aug 2026, 08:19 UTC35 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

— соре за то что проподаю 🙏🙏

custom 53326953510716468261

8 Aug 2026, 08:18 UTC35 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

— небольшой спойлер 😮‍💨😮‍💨😮‍💨😮‍💨

custom 53391611494578473344custom 54630641999638984562custom 52314151860987630561custom 53778301187082321391

5 Aug 2026, 19:54 UTC55 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

— в общем отдельно 🙂‍↕️🙂‍↕️

custom 52291484655686921862

5 Aug 2026, 18:40 UTC59 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

— кстати, мне стоит выкладывать каждого перса отдельно и пояснять как да чего или всех сразу и без лишних слов?

  1. отдельно82%
  2. всех сразу18%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

custom 53326953510716468262

5 Aug 2026, 18:36 UTC61 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

— я настолько прогресснула, что смогла нарисовать полноценку в Крите 💀💀💀💀💀💀. я счастлива 🙏🙏🙏🙏 — дожидается ответа и летс гоу рисовать редизайны ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ автор : @keyliiis моя будка : @psrabi

custom 53326953510716468266custom 52314151860987630561custom 53391611494578473341custom 53778301187082321391

5 Aug 2026, 15:37 UTC196 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

— ребяты, как вам такой мини интерактив? вы скинете своих персонажей (или любых других), а я сделаю типо редизайна? если хотите, то покидайте их под этот пост 🙂‍↕️🙂‍↕️ — закончился набор (КТО НЕ УСПЕЛ ТОТ ОПАЗДАЛ😮‍💨😮‍💨😮‍💨😮‍💨😮‍💨😮‍💨)

custom 523141518609876305611

4 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC320 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

— буду вам хвастаться. я смогла нарисовать Джо джо ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ автор : @keyliiis моя будка : @psrabi

custom 546306419996389845613custom 52314151860987630563custom 53326953510716468262custom 52291484655686921861custom 53327683053861388241custom 53391611494578473341

2 Aug 2026, 13:22 UTC376 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

— ода, целых 3 коллабы на летнем вайбе. и пофиг что уже последний месяц лета ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ автор : @keyliiis моя будка : @psrabi

custom 546306419996389845610custom 53326953510716468262custom 53778301187082321392custom 52291484655686921861custom 52314151860987630561custom 53327683053861388241custom 53391611494578473341

2 Aug 2026, 07:34 UTC298 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

— вот какая красота выходит. Мне нравиться, оно так окуратненько выходит 💘🤌💘🤌💘🤌 ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ автор : @keyliiis моя будка : @psrabi

custom 533269535107164682610custom 52314151860987630564custom 53778301187082321394custom 52291484655686921861custom 53327683053861388241custom 53391611494578473341

31 Jul 2026, 14:48 UTC131 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

— ещё я хочу перерисовать аву.. типо суть оставить такую же, но в своем "новом" стиле перерисовать ее 👊👊

custom 54630641999638984564custom 53326953510716468263custom 52314151860987630562custom 53327683053861388242

31 Jul 2026, 14:39 UTC120 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

— и знаете, выходит даже не плохо. думаю попробовать 1 из заказов в ней и зашкрябать 😮‍💨😮‍💨😮‍💨😮‍💨😮‍💨😮‍💨😮‍💨

custom 53778301187082321396custom 53327683053861388242custom 54630641999638984562custom 53326953510716468261custom 53391611494578473341

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @psrabi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

5 Aug 2026, 18:40 UTCFinal Results11 voters

— кстати, мне стоит выкладывать каждого перса отдельно и пояснять как да чего или всех сразу и без лишних слов?

  1. отдельно82%
  2. всех сразу18%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

29 Jul 2026, 11:46 UTCFinal Results23 voters

Что делаем с призами и конкурсом?

  1. Мы оставляем конкурс и меняем призы, а какие уже решаем вместе74%
  2. Мы отменяем конкурс26%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,209,487 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“" ͟𝗽͟͟𝗮͟𝗿͟𝗮͟𝗱𝗶𝘀𝗲 " 🩸 #кл” (@psrabi), 145 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psrabi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.