новая аватарка!!🍓 не теряйте!)
💘1

Channel
@psmyloveperson
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
176subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002498896492 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @psmyloveperson |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/psmyloveperson |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 23:38 | 176 | +1 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 09:21 | 175 | -5 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 07:37 | 180 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:35 | 182 | -1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:29 | 183 | +3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:30 | 180 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:17 | 180 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 28 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
288 reactions across 12 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 13.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5348036244108508281 | 40 | 13.9% | |
| 💘 | 40 | 13.9% | |
| custom 5208706950975487946 | 33 | 11.5% | |
| custom 5348085954059993935 | 32 | 11.1% | |
| custom 5323403588758699407 | 30 | 10.4% | |
| ❤🔥 | 17 | 5.90% | |
| custom 5323796707115302023 | 16 | 5.56% | |
| 😍 | 14 | 4.86% | |
| 💔 | 13 | 4.51% | |
| custom 5303377156984826322 | 11 | 3.82% | |
| custom 5269221558412399059 | 8 | 2.78% | |
| custom 5350376077866867291 | 6 | 2.08% | |
| 🕊 | 6 | 2.08% | |
| 💅 | 5 | 1.74% | |
| custom 5271847265193972912 | 3 | 1.04% | |
| custom 5323341427697025419 | 3 | 1.04% | |
| custom 5271595309527486438 | 2 | 0.694% | |
| custom 5301170059190766514 | 2 | 0.694% | |
| custom 5303360578411065417 | 2 | 0.694% | |
| custom 5368361743045124915 | 2 | 0.694% | |
| 2 further kinds | 3 | 1.04% |
Custom emoji. 14 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 288 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 28 June 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
новая аватарка!!🍓 не теряйте!)
💘1
она 100 из 10
💘9custom 52087069509754879466custom 53234035887586994075💅1
с днем рождения любимую Софию Ротару!👜
custom 520870695097548794612💘3💅1🕊1
с днем рождения Марию Куликову!
💘14custom 52087069509754879466❤🔥4💅1🕊1😍1
уж очень привлек меня этот тренд🦋
❤🔥13custom 52087069509754879469custom 53234035887586994078💔1💘1🕊1
“С утра?Губы красные? Берегись!!!Опасна я.” хаха,легенда
custom 532340358875869940717😍9💘6💅1💔1
paparazzi 📸 поняла,что эдиты у меня такие,будто иван золо делал,мне больше подходят спокойные видео с медленным текстом чем вот это😎
custom 534808595405999393510😍3custom 53480362441085082813💅1💘1
-Помоги мне!.. #моёвидео #бриллиантоваярука #фильм
custom 534808595405999393510custom 53480362441085082814🕊3custom 53683617430451249151
у меня гиперфикс на мерил стрип
custom 534803624410850828113custom 53480859540599939355custom 53033771569848263224💋1
“Looking back, perhaps the biggest problem was fear. Fear of failure, fear of other people, but mostly fear of myself. It took sixty years to figure out who I really am. It's never too late to find yourself, no matter how lost you may be.” -Linda Bellingham 💙 #линдабеллингем #моёвидео
💔11custom 53480859540599939356💘5custom 53480362441085082812😍1custom 53683617430451249151
Хочу в этот раз полностью посвятить пост великолепным нарядам Людмилы Марковны!! В любой одежде-простой, экстравагантной, совершенно обычной или шикарной-её фигура,харизма-всё шикарно сочетается с любым нарядом!! сделала такие коллажики со многими ее нарядами,кайфовала,реально. я восхищаюсь Людмилой Марковной!🩶 #людмилагурченко #коллаж
custom 534803624410850828118custom 53033771569848263227custom 53503760778668672916custom 53011700591907665142custom 53033605784110654172custom 53480859540599939351
_______________________ “Я туда поехала по зову сердца, а не по призыву партии, хотя нас предупреждали, что это опасно, но мы не понимали. Передо мной там сидели смертники. Люди просили апельсины и Пугачеву. И я не могла отказаться. Уже там стало ясно, что у людей тяжелое положение, катастрофа. Нас предупредили, что это опасно.Во-первых, запретили есть, что там предлагали. Сказали взять с собой сухарики. Я даже похуд…
custom 532379670711530202316custom 52692215584123990598custom 52718472651939729123custom 53233414276970254193custom 52715953095274864382custom 53841402932494525702
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @psmyloveperson. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Мᥲдᥲʍ δρ᧐ɯκᥙнᥲ!” (@psmyloveperson), 176 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psmyloveperson.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.