Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for PSIXOLOGIYA│Psixolog kanali

Channel

PSIXOLOGIYA│Psixolog kanali

@psixologkanali

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

460subscribers

-11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001344854849
TypeChannel
Username@psixologkanali
Created9 November 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/psixologkanali

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

460471465.57 August 2026 — 471 subscribers8 August 2026 — 471 subscribers16 August 2026 — 469 subscribers25 August 2026 — 468 subscribers1 September 2026 — 465 subscribers11 September 2026 — 460 subscribers7 August 202611 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 35 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 458–473 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 07:39460-5
1 Sept 2026, 13:53465-3
25 Aug 2026, 01:18468-1
16 Aug 2026, 14:04469-2
8 Aug 2026, 04:45471no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:27471first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 11 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

8 reactions across 6 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
337.5%
👍225.0%
👎112.5%
😁112.5%
🤩112.5%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 January 2026 to 18 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Feb 2026, 06:05 UTC350 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

PSIXOLOGIK KURS: ICHKI SOYA BILAN GORMONIYA 🧘‍♂️🧘‍♀️ O‘zingiz bilan tinchlikka erishishga tayyormisiz? Unda ichki “soya”ngiz bilan tanishib, uni hayotingizga to'g'ri yo'naltiring. Buni bir kunlik offline kursimizda o'rganish mumkin. 📚 KARL YUNG NAZARIYASI ASOSIDA: “Soya” – bu biz o‘zimizda tan olmaydigan, ammo ongsiz ravishda bizni boshqaradigan qismimizdir. Kursda Karl Yung nazariyasi bilan o‘sishni boshlaysiz. ✅

29 Jan 2026, 09:43 UTC358 viewsread 8 August 2026

​​Videolarni 2 baravar tezlikda tomosha qilish psixikaga zararli - Psixiatrlar ta'kidlaydi 🤯🧠 Videolarni tezlashtirish odati vaqtni tejash illyuziyasini yaratadi — miya ortiqcha yukga moslashadi va normal sur'atda qanday ishlashni unutadi. Natijada, normal hayot tempi - kundalik muloqot yoki kimnidir kutish juda sekin o'tayotgandek hamda bezovta qiluvchi bo'lib tuyiladi. davomini o'qish 👇👇 👁‍🗨 Batafsil tanishish uc

27 Jan 2026, 16:34 UTC328 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

​​Comment ga javob: Negativ fikrlashni qanday o'zgartirish mumkin? Negativ fikrlash - bu neyronlarning salbiy o'ylashga o'rganib qolishi. Uni o‘zgartirish uchun avtomatlashuvni "buzish" kerak. Quyida bir necha tavsiyalar: 1. Kognitiv qayta qurish: "Miya gimnastikasi" • Bajaring: Salbiy fikrlarni yozing va "shunday o'ylashimga real asos bormi?" degan savol qo'ying". 2. Diqqatni Boshqarish: "Hozirga qaytish" • B

1👍1

26 Jan 2026, 20:09 UTC483 viewsread 8 August 2026

​​Doimiy negativ fikrlash miyani "qaritadi" 🧠🤯 Salbiy narsalar haqida o'ylaganimizda, tana katta miqdorda kortizol (stress gormoni) chiqaradi. Bu gormon miya hujayralariga zarar yetkazadi, kognitiv funktsiyani buzadi va miyani ichkaridan "yo'q qiladi": salbiy fikr → stress → miya hujayralariga zarar → kognitiv qobiliyatning pasayishi. Quyidagi savollar negativ fikrlashga moyillikni ochib beradi: 🔎 ❓ davomini o'qis

24 Jan 2026, 17:25 UTC271 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

​​Kitob o'qish umrni uzaytiradi - daromad, ta'lim va sog'liq qanday bo'lishidan qat'i nazar. 🧠💪 Kitob o'qish miyani "bo'shashtiradi" va meditatsiyaga o'xshash holatga o'tqizadi, asab tizimini tinchlantiradi va stress darajasini sezilarli kamaytiradi. 📈 Kitobsevarlarda miya qarishi va keksalikdagi xotira pasayishi kech ro'y beradi. 📌 Obuna bo'lish: @psixologkanali

1

23 Jan 2026, 08:30 UTC520 viewsread 8 August 2026

​​Madaniyatimizda juda keng tarqalgan, bolani hissiy buzuvchi holatlar 🙆‍♂️🧠 Tashlab ketilish hissi bola miyasi uchun haqiqiy xavf bo'lib, quyidagi holatlarda bola buni real qo'rquv va vahima sifatida ko'radi: 🔸 Agar "yaxshi bola" bo'lmasang: "do'xtir (politsiya) ga berib yuboraman", "yomon bola"lar maktabiga tashlab kelaman". 🔸 Tarbiya doirasida aytiladigan gaplar: "Seni tashlab ketib qolaman". 🔸 Agar "yaxshi bo

20 Jan 2026, 11:04 UTC215 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

​​Ba'zan kitobdan ko'ra filmlar ko'proq o'rgatadi 🎬 Manipulyator o'z "o'lja"sini qanday "yutib yuborishi"ni ko'rsatuvchi Top3 film: 1️⃣ Gone Girl, 2014 – G'oyib bo'lgan ayol 🔑 O'rgatadi: Doim “mukammal sherik” talab qiladigan odamni tanlasangiz – ehtiyot bo’ling. 2️⃣ Gaslight, 1944 – Gazlayting 🔑 O'rgatadi: Kimdir aqlingiz o'tmaslashayotganiga ishontirayotgan bo'lsa – bu “gaslighting” belgisi. 3️⃣ The Social N

👍1

19 Jan 2026, 12:32 UTC223 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

​​O'ta itoatkor, hech qachon "yo'q" demaydigan bola - sog'lom emas 👦🏻👎 Chunki u o'z chegaralarini bilmaydi va o'zini himoya qila olmaydigan odamga aylanadi. ☑️ Bunday bolalar tashqaridan shunday ko’rinadi: - Har doim "ha" deydi; - Hech qachon qarshi chiqmaydi; - Ota-onasi (hamma) ning har bir istagini bajaradi. 👁‍🗨 Batafsil tanishish uchun 📌 Obuna bo'lish: @psixologkanali

👎1

19 Jan 2026, 11:20 UTC190 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @psixohimoyauzPhoto

Har qanday kuchli emotsiyalarni 5 maslahat bilan bo'ysundirish 🧠✅ 1️⃣ Hech qachon hech narsani shaxsiy qabul qilmang - boshqalarning harakatlari aslida siz haqingizda emas, o'z ichki dunyosining aksi. 2️⃣ Har doim yuz ifodalaringizni nazorat qiling - mimika hissiy holatingizni aks ettiradi; uni tinch saqlash sizga kuch beradi. 3️⃣ Haqoratlarga munosabat bildirmang, ammo unutmang - dushmanlikka darhol javob bermang

🤩1😁1

18 Jan 2026, 15:00 UTC170 viewsread 8 August 2026

​​Yuqori IQ egalari munosabatlarda yolg'iz qolish ehtimoli ko'proq 🧠📈 Intellektuallar munosabatlarda qiynaladi, sababi ko'p o'ylab yuborish. Logika va impulsivlikning pastligi kimnidir "yoqtirib qolish"ni qiyinlashtiradi. 💔❌ 💡Professor M. Kremer aniqladiki: intellektual va yaxshi ta'lim olgan yosh erkaklar, tengdoshlariga qaraganda uzoqroq vaqt yolg'iz qolishadi. ⚡️Sabab tanishuv uslubida ... 👁‍🗨 Batafsil tanishi

18 Jan 2026, 14:04 UTC152 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @psixohimoyauzPoll

Suhbatga 1 soat qoldi, "bor-yo'q" qilib yuboramizmi, tayyormisizlar 😁😁

  1. ha, albatta 😁68%
  2. afsuski, yo'q 🤭17%
  3. kech qolishim mumkin 🤔14%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @psixologkanali. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

18 Jan 2026, 14:04 UTCAnonymous Poll201 voters

Suhbatga 1 soat qoldi, "bor-yo'q" qilib yuboramizmi, tayyormisizlar 😁😁

  1. ha, albatta 😁68%
  2. afsuski, yo'q 🤭17%
  3. kech qolishim mumkin 🤔14%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

11 Jan 2026, 14:34 UTCFinal Results264 voters

Suhbatga 30 daqiqa qoldi, tayyormisizlar, "bor-yo'q" qilib yuboraylik 😄😄

  1. ha, albatta50%
  2. afsus, kirolmayman29%
  3. kech qolishim ham mumkin21%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 January 2026 to 18 February 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PSIXOLOGIYA│Psixolog kanali” (@psixologkanali), 460 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psixologkanali.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.