Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Хлоргексидин

@psittacism

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

751subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001238885069
TypeChannel
Username@psittacism
DescriptionБывший политтехнолог и редакционный мужик Лучше ходить под себя, чем по воде
Created6 August 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/psittacism

Growth

7516 Aug 2026, 09:47 — 751 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 16:03 — 751 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 09:476 Aug 2026, 16:03
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 750–752 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 16:03751no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:47751first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 April 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,250
Videos
167
Links
1,300

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

222 reactions across 19 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥17076.6%
😢5223.4%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 222reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 April 2024 to 29 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 20 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @psittacism. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 April 2024 to 29 August 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

29 Aug 2025, 16:58 UTC749 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Превью, которое меня забайтило. Отвечаю, Хрущев — это новая Югославия, да и тема не менее сложная. Сейчас полетят документалки из всех щелей. И это хорошо

🔥3

20 Aug 2025, 14:25 UTC≈12,200 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Тональность, гармоника и размер позволяют легким образом сыграть вступление песни Survivor ВИА Destiny’s Child, после чего сразу исполнить куплетную и припевную части «На недельку до второго», если вам интересна эта информация

🔥7

20 Aug 2025, 13:50 UTC≈1,950 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

⚡️На грядущем Интервидении против Шамана от США выступит Кид Рок

🔥3

19 Aug 2025, 12:49 UTC750 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Узнал, что на телеканале "Пятница" уже пару лет идет шоу "Секреты на кухне". Зная гений Картоза, неудивительно, что там все про еду, путешествия и матримониальное (уж он-то Россию понял). Но возможно и такое, что мы этот его гений поняли не до конца: судя по названию шоу Николай Борисович (@kartozz), почуяв время, задумывал его как состязание политических анекдотов с последующим обсуждением. Согласно правилам победи

🔥7

21 Jul 2025, 19:33 UTC916 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Не забывай свои корни. Помни: есть вещи на порядок выше, слышишь? Поддерживайте классику, остальное — от лукавого.

🔥6

14 Jul 2025, 18:13 UTC≈1,390 views20 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

Зацепился в винной разливухе «Утопист» с предприимчивым армянином. Он вышел с киносеанса (Трюффо, про парня, который менял профессии в поисках себя) и заметил, что трансфер технологий нынче очень полезен. Всю жизнь он был самогонщиком, но теперь его жизнь резко поменялась. Согласно его словам, нефти сейчас в стране избыток, люди открывают переработку чуть ли не у себя на дачном дворе, если есть доступ к логистически

🔥18😢2

4 Jan 2025, 23:19 UTC≈1,570 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Сейчас еще чуть-чуть и

😢3

3 Jan 2025, 00:24 UTC≈1,640 views9 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

Лиза Лазерсон была час назад онлайн

😢9

28 Aug 2024, 19:12 UTC≈3,070 views7 reactions2 Starsread 6 August 2026
Video

А я Милова узззнаааю апапаходаке по повестке. Долго силился молчать, однако нынешний спин вокруг новостного фаллоса все же разогнал внутри моих чресел пытливость и любопытство. Что мы имеем: 1. Дуров задержан и неясно, летел ли он на сделку под белы рученьки. Все же, зарабатывать репутацию Ассанжа/Навального не совсем в его амплуа. 2. Бывшая Дурова внезапно проснулась с обвинениями в насилии над общими детьми. 3. С

😢6🔥1

12 Jul 2024, 19:37 UTC≈7,590 views41 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Всю неделю ношу в голове пост, чтобы подарить его здесь, но чем дольше размышляю о его пользе, тем меньше хочется его писать. Поглядите как так получается. Думал расчехлить про отсутствие сожаления по поводу смирения с войной в стане оставшихся интеллигентов. Два дня ваял эту мысль в умозрительной мастерской, а потом поехал в реальный цех: зашкурил пороги дедовской «Волги», обезжирил, пролил их эпоксидным грунтом, е

🔥39😢2

5 Jul 2024, 22:14 UTC≈1,490 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Не понимаю, переспал бы я с Олесей Герасименко или нет

😢1

14 Jun 2024, 15:42 UTC≈1,790 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Мирный план, предложенный сегодня Папой на планерке в МИДе, — он, конечно же, не мирный, да и не план особо. Никто не ожидает, что его примут. На языке технологов это называется «подготовить поляну»: забрасываешь тезисы, пускай даже самые неприемлемые, у которых главная цель — вызвать дискуссию, остаться в головах. Запад от них откажется, назовет оскорбительными, заявит о солидарности, но в целом будет понятна приме

🔥6

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @psittacism. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 Apr 2024, 17:54 UTCAnonymous Poll268 voters

Так, я вышел на производителя и готов серьезно взяться за дело. Давайте проведем количественное маркетинговое исследование!

  1. Я бы с удовольствием купил/подарил диффузор или свечу с ароматом WD4034%
  2. Я не знаю, что такое WD4016%
  3. Я знаю, что такое WD40 и эта идея говно50%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 April 2024 to 29 August 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Хлоргексидин” (@psittacism), 751 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psittacism.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.