Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
3 measurements spanning 16 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 895–898 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Sept 2026, 19:40
895
-3
30 Aug 2026, 14:04
898
no change
30 Aug 2026, 00:15
898
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 26 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
8s
Average length
8s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
35 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
24
68.6%
💯
2
5.71%
🔥
2
5.71%
😱
2
5.71%
🙏
2
5.71%
⚡
1
2.86%
😍
1
2.86%
🤝
1
2.86%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2026 to 11 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎶 One song. One memory. One piece of our AAU story. 💚
What song will instantly take you back to your AAU days?
We’re creating the AAU Batch of 2026 Graduation Playlist —a collection of the songs that carried us through the friendships, challenges, late nights, celebrations, and unforgettable moments.
🎧 Add your song here:
https://open.spotify.com/playlist/5aPpjEI22pd2gzxwIL4Llg?si=kWwI32LYSZWLveZTOS6L2Q&utm_source…
Your neighborhood wants CCTV on every corner.
Safer streets or surveillance overreach?
#PSIRClub #ConstitutionInYourLives #PrivacyVsSecurity #Civics #PoliticalTheory
Art 26: Right to privacy40%
Art 29: Freedom of expression8%
Art 15: Right to security31%
No issue, safety first21%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🚀 Cohort I Registration is Now Open!
The wait is over! Applications for UICA Cohort I are officially open.
Are you a young leader, innovator, entrepreneur, student, or change maker ready to create impact in your community and beyond? This is your time to act.
Join a network of ambitious young Africans committed to learning, collaboration, leadership, and innovation.
📅 Application Deadline: June 27, 2026
Don't wa…
An insightful discussion on diplomacy, global affairs and international change 🌍🇦🇷
Thank you to H.E. Ambassador Juan Ignacio Roccatagliata and everyone who joined us for this engaging Public Lecture hosted by PSIR Club.
#PSIRclub
🌍🤝 Expanding Pan-African Collaboration
The Ubuntu Initiative for Continental Advancement (UICA), together with the PSIR Club of Addis Ababa University, is pleased to connect with Space Club UNN of the University of Nigeria.
At UICA, we believe that Africa's progress requires the contribution of students and young professionals from every field of study and sector. Whether in engineering, medicine, law, agriculture,…
🌍 Meet Our Guest Speaker!
Fenet Dereje 🇪🇹
PSIR Club Ambassador
Student at Addis Ababa University
We are delighted to welcome Fenet Dereje as a guest speaker at the Ubuntu Diplomacy Forum. As a student at Addis Ababa University and a PSIR Club Ambassador, Fenet is passionate about international relations, youth engagement, and fostering meaningful dialogue on issues that shape Africa's future.
Through her academic …
The Ubuntu Initiative for Continental Advancement (UICA) is pleased to announce its collaboration with the PSIR Club of Addis Ababa University 🎉
This partnership reflects our shared commitment to empowering young leaders, promoting meaningful dialogue on African and global affairs, and creating opportunities for academic and professional growth. 🌍🤝
Together, we look forward to organizing impactful programs, fosteri…
Our first panel discussion was a success! 🌍
A heartfelt thank you to everyone who joined us for an engaging conversation on
American democracy and global politics.
Special thanks to professor Tzazu for moderating the session and sharing valuable insights that made the discussion both thought provoking and interactive.
We would also like to recognize Beseal Melaku for his active participation and thoughtful contrib…
This is a reminder that the PSIR Club Panel Discussion will be held on Friday at 7:30 PM.
Google Meet Link: https://meet.google.com/xwb-xhwk-cmm
Kindly join a few minutes before the scheduled time.
#PSIRClub
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @psirclub2023. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Your neighborhood wants CCTV on every corner.
Safer streets or surveillance overreach?
#PSIRClub #ConstitutionInYourLives #PrivacyVsSecurity #Civics #PoliticalTheory
Art 26: Right to privacy40%
Art 29: Freedom of expression8%
Art 15: Right to security31%
No issue, safety first21%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2026 to 11 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PSIR Club” (@psirclub2023), 895 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psirclub2023.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.