Video message, posted without a caption
😍2❤1👍1

Channel
@psikhika_fizika
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Declared links · Cite this entry
456subscribers
-14 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001902468705 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @psikhika_fizika |
| Created | Between 1 March 2023 and 31 January 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/psikhika_fizika |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 06:58 | 456 | -2 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 21:57 | 458 | -2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 10:07 | 460 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:06 | 463 | -3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 15:58 | 466 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:03 | 470 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:34 | 470 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
240 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 64 | 26.7% | |
| ❤ | 53 | 22.1% | |
| ❤🔥 | 39 | 16.3% | |
| 👍 | 27 | 11.3% | |
| 💯 | 22 | 9.17% | |
| 😍 | 12 | 5.00% | |
| 🤗 | 10 | 4.17% | |
| 🙏 | 7 | 2.92% | |
| 🤩 | 6 | 2.50% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 240 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Video message, posted without a caption
😍2❤1👍1
Video message, posted without a caption
❤🔥2👍1🔥1🤗1
Video message, posted without a caption
❤🔥2🔥2👍1💯1
За 2 недели может измениться гораздо больше, чем кажется. Последние две недели я сопровождаю предпринимателя, который после банкротства начал практически заново выстраивать свой бизнес. Когда мы начали работать, он жил в постоянном внутреннем напряжении. После банкротства любое сложное общение воспринималось как потенциальная угроза: нужно было всё предусмотреть, никого не разочаровать, удержать, объяснить, оправдат…
❤🔥5🔥4❤2👍2🤗2
Почему фраза «Я всё понимаю» чаще всего означает, что ничего пока не изменится. Многие годы я головой прекрасно понимала, как состояние определяет всю нашу жизнь. Но понимание — это вообще не знание. И тем более не действие. К сожалению, до нас по-настоящему доходит только «через ноги». И тогда приходится, как той лягушке из притчи, бешено взбивать лапками масло, чтобы просто не утонуть и вытащить себя за волосы. …
❤5🔥4💯3👍2🙏2
Сегодня осознала одну вещь. Как легко я стала отпускать людей. Я помню, как каждое «подумаю» воспринималось как непризнание и переживалось. Потом, со временем появилось понимание, что «подумаю» - это про то, что я не донесла ценность и не раскрыла для человека как именно я могу помочь ему решить его задачу. Потом «подумаю» переросло в классную возможность открыть человеку глаза на его страхи и провести его через н…
❤5💯4🔥4❤🔥2👍1🤗1
Почему один эксперт продает сопровождение за 300 тысяч, а другой не может продать консультацию за 5? И дело совсем не в количестве информации. И даже не в том, насколько вы опытный эксперт с десятком дипломов. Недавно ко мне в сопровождение пришел предприниматель. Когда-то его бизнес приносил хорошие деньги. Но в какой-то момент рост остановился. И очень быстро стало понятно, что дело не в маркетинге и не в количес…
🔥4❤3❤🔥3💯3👍2🤩1
«Мне нужно подумать…» — фраза, которая чаще всего оставляет человека в той же точке. За последнее время я провела десятки встреч с экспертами и предпринимателями. И знаете, что поняла? На одном финансовом уровне возникают одни и те же мысли: «Я еще не готов.» «Мне нужно подумать.» «Наверное, позже.» И дело совсем не в том, что человеку действительно нужно время. Это способ психики сохранить привычную реальность. …
🔥5❤🔥3❤2👍2😍2💯1
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥4❤3💯2🤗1
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥4❤3👍3🤗2
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥4❤3❤🔥3😍2
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥4❤3💯2😍2🤩1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @psikhika_fizika. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
One URL this entry has put in its own public description, shown exactly as written there. A declaration, not a verified association — we measured that the description contained this text, and nothing more. It is not a claim that this entry owns, runs or is connected to whatever the link resolves to; a description is text anyone controls, and anyone can put anyone else’s URL into it. How this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Татьяна Александрова/Психология денег” (@psikhika_fizika), 456 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psikhika_fizika.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.