Channel
@psihologiya_pitaniya_vi
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
33subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003119665362 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @psihologiya_pitaniya_vi |
| Created | Between 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/psihologiya_pitaniya_vi |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 30 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Oct 2026, 17:00 | 33 | +1 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 03:56 | 32 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:01 | 33 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:37 | 33 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
38 reactions across 10 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 11 | 28.9% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 13.2% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 13.2% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 13.2% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 10.5% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 7.89% | |
| 💔 | 2 | 5.26% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 2.63% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 2.63% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 2.63% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎤 «Про стыд за тело» — стыд за тело и еду; — почему “просто похудей” не работает; — зачем спрашивать себя: “для чего я хочу похудеть?”; — почему сравнение с другими нечестно; — здоровье — это не только вес, но и психика. Если тебе знакомо чувство “со мной что-то не так” — послушай. Если было полезно,жду твои реакции 🖤 #рпп #психологияпитания
Ой, ребятки! Скоро приду к вам с очень крутой информацией 😍
❤1
Немного юмора 😀 А вообще, есть тут кто живой?! 🤔
😁4💯1🤣1
Мои костыли на пути к СЕБЕ 🖤
🔥3💔1
Принятие себя ≠ бодипозитиву «Если я приму себя, я что — за бодипозитив?!» — мысли многих. Мои в том числе были.🤔 Давайте разбираться. Если верить Википедии, что же это вообще такое? Бодипозитив — это социальное движение, призывающее принимать внешность любой: размер, возраст, цвет кожи, шрамы. Его лозунг: «Твоё тело — не повод для стыда». Если вы сразу же выходите с транспарантами и в модели плюс-сайз (что тоже…
👍3❤1
Когда стирается грань и ты не понимаешь, что это уже не про здоровье …
❤2💔1💯1
Что зацепило меня: Многое ещё зависит от мужчины… Тогда мы и начинаем любить себя… Безусловно, поддержка близкого человека важна и нужна!🫶 Но если с тобой рядом человек, который всё-таки ищет в тебе изъяны, то вопрос к себе самой…🤔 И если эта история про «многое» и «тогда» зависит от мужчины рядом с тобой… Если только мужчина / мужчины дают тебе чувство восхищения и любви к себе, то что это, если не очередная за…
❤2💯1
Недавно получила вот такой комментарий под темой поста про мой отказ от диет. Он меня «зацепил». Как думаете, что с ним не так?! Если будет интересно - разберем 💪
❤1👍1🤔1
Поздравляю Испанию, но не от всего сердца🫣 Вот как так, Лео.. Как так…
💯1😁1🙏1
Ну мы?!
❤3❤🔥2💯1
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥2❤1❤🔥1
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @psihologiya_pitaniya_vi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Просто.Ешь.Еду.” (@psihologiya_pitaniya_vi), 33 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psihologiya_pitaniya_vi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.