Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Психолог Гульшат Сафина

@psihologGulshat

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

190subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002040968125
TypeChannel
Username@psihologGulshat
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/psihologGulshat

Growth

19011 Aug 2026, 07:16 — 190 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 22:17 — 190 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 07:1611 Aug 2026, 22:17
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 189–191 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 22:17190no change
11 Aug 2026, 07:16190first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.9%
avg views ÷ 190 subscribers
Avg views / post
45.4
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
13.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held18 (23 July 202610 August 2026)
Views total817
Reactions total109
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 07:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 41s
Average length
47s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

109 reactions across 18 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6862.4%
👍2018.3%
🙏1614.7%
👌32.75%
😍21.83%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 109reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 04:36 UTC17 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

«Быть к себе доброй». Давайте проживем эту неделю с этим ощущением. Быть доброй именно к себе. Задавать себе вопросы: а чем я себя могу сейчас порадовать? Что я чувствую именно сейчас? Что мне дает силы, любовь? И в конце недели вы удивитесь, насколько мир добр и открыт для вас❤️

4👍1🙏1

9 Aug 2026, 04:21 UTC21 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Грусть от потери — это естественная и важная часть нашего эмоционального опыта. Когда мы теряем кого-то или что-то значимое, наша душа переживает глубокую рану. Это чувство может быть подавляющим, но важно помнить, что грусть — не враг, а проводник. Она помогает нам осознать ценность того, что было, и позволяет начать процесс исцеления. На консультациях, терапевтических встречах я часто повторяю фразу "Что ты сейчас

2👍1

8 Aug 2026, 05:13 UTC25 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

Я не могу изменить мир. Но я способна создавать свои микромиры, где есть радость, улыбки, тепло и горячий чай❤️ Психолог, коуч Гульшат Сафина.

5👍1🙏1

6 Aug 2026, 07:42 UTC38 views9 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Про выбор в двух словах: «В любой момент у нас есть два варианта: сделать шаг вперёд к росту или вернуться в безопасное место». Абрахам Маслоу

7🙏2

5 Aug 2026, 09:13 UTC35 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Сам себе эмпат Развивая в терапии это качество к себе - прислушиваться к своим чувствам, принимая и давая поддержку - у нас значительно уменьшается спрос с других. Все реже хочется воспроизвести невозможное: чтобы значимая и крепкая фигура, напоминающая родителя, обладала эмпатией. Личность с травмой зависимый/созависимый особенно часто пребывает в этих процессах, и как правило бьётся с вторичной фигурой. Чем больш

3👍3🙏1

4 Aug 2026, 17:05 UTC35 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

А вы сегодня уже ловили моменты счастья? Я вот, ловлю именно в эти секунды ❤️🤲 Задание для терапевтической группы на этой неделе было про моменты счастья. Пользуйтесь во благо, если и вам актуально Задание для саморефлексии: выпишите себе в блокнот/ежедневник/напоминалку 10 пунктов/действий/моментов - в общем того, что вас делает счастливыми. В какие моменты вы понимаете, что вы счастливы?

3👍2🙏1

4 Aug 2026, 03:58 UTC36 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Смотрю на это древнее строение, которое пережило много всего - ветра-бураны, дождь и снег, разрушения и удивляюсь устойчивости. Трогаю камни, прохожу пальцами по извести, соединяющей все эти глыбы меж собой. И задаюсь вопросом: а может ли человеческая психика быть столь же устойчивой и крепкой? Или те сложности, которые встречаются на нашем пути, кого-то ломают, а кто-то превращается в камень/кремень? А что может д

3🙏2

3 Aug 2026, 08:53 UTC41 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

Не обманывайтесь фразой «хоть лежи в направлении своей цели»!!! Тут напоминаю про необходимость действия в соответствии с теми целями, шагами, которые прописали вместе с коучем в процессе сессии. Не обманывайтесь фразой «хоть лежи в направлении своей цели», он про бездействие. Хоть пару скнтиметров, но ползти к своим целям ежедневно - и через месяц вы удивитесь, сколько пути прошли.

4👌3

3 Aug 2026, 08:50 UTC39 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

Бывает ли у вас такое, что вы начинаете чувствовать, что достигли своего потолка в той деятельности, в которой развиваетесь? «Что дальше? Куда мне двигаться? На эти и другие вопросы может помочь ответить карьерный Коучинг.

3🙏1

30 Jul 2026, 11:00 UTC51 views9 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

"Выгорание". Вам не кажется, что это слово, как и само состояние, стало мейнстримом (если говорить словами молодежи)? В век высоких технологий, тонны информационного шума, фоновой тревожности мы потихоньку разучились вовремя "отключаться". Выгорание — это не просто усталость, это сигнал вашего организма о том, что пора остановиться и обратить внимание на себя. В мире, полном забот и обязанностей, мы иногда забываем

4👍3😍2

29 Jul 2026, 16:44 UTC63 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

Вы молодцы. Вы прошли через многое. Вы справились. Вы справляетесь. И увас есть опыт и дальше справляться. 🫂🫂🫂 Решила записать такое послание после групповой терапии всем, кому сейчас это важно. Дайте знать, если актуально❤️ И поделись с тем, кому на ваш взгляд сейчас нужны эти слова🙌

6🙏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @psihologGulshat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,268,280 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Психолог Гульшат Сафина” (@psihologGulshat), 190 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psihologGulshat.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.