Channel
@ps_detailing_pshik
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
258subscribers
+9 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002520321255 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ps_detailing_pshik |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ps_detailing_pshik |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2026, 06:41 | 258 | +5 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 16:28 | 253 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:48 | 252 | +3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:21 | 249 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:46 | 249 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
137 reactions across 6 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 60 | 43.8% | |
| 👍 | 51 | 37.2% | |
| 🆒 | 9 | 6.57% | |
| custom 5210956306952758910 | 6 | 4.38% | |
| custom 5253752975997803460 | 6 | 4.38% | |
| custom 5355036456685422193 | 3 | 2.19% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 1.46% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 137 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Приехала неожиданная посылочка от @EwanWD. Вань, большое большое спасибо, за возможность попробовать интересные составы и аксессуары ❤️🤝 Все буду пробовать и делиться впечатлениями, а что-то уже попробовал 😅 Ещё раз спасибо! Канал Вани. 🔤🔤😂 на связи! 📱
🔥14🆒6custom 52537529759978034603👍1
Много времени прошло с момента прошлого поста по стеклам, и вот, наконец-то, результаты по полировке стекла. Полировал стекло жучка: оно было затерто дворниками, да и нужно было убрать косяки, которые бесили.😅 Выбрал связку от Шайна в виде двух паст, и, честно сказать, я остался доволен. Опыта работы с другими подобными составами у меня не было, но вот эта связка мне понравилась. Во-первых, как разносятся пасты по …
👍14🔥7custom 52109563069527589102🆒1
Ну, и ролик 😅
👍13custom 52537529759978034603🎉2custom 52109563069527589101
Как-то давно я выкладывал отрывок из будущего ролика на канале, и вот этот момент настал 😂 Буду благодарен за критику и не только в комментариях. Все материалы прикрепил в ролике) Начнем с мойки. На первую фазу использовал Carpro Lift в разведении 1:10. Состав приятно пахнет и отлично пенится. Понятно, что грязь он не шибко тянет, но чтобы погонять летом пыль - пойдет. Ещё отмечу, что он недолго лежит на кузове: две-…
👍12🔥7custom 52109563069527589101
Привели в порядок стеллаж, теперь можно и машиной заниматься 😅
🔥16👍5🆒2custom 52109563069527589101
📷 Смогу удивить или разочарую? Почему решил начать так? Да потому что за 2 часа я успел помыть машину и ещё ролик снять. Кадры будут, скорее всего, хуже, нежели дома, но я старался 😅 Авто было пыльным, весь в кальции и грязноватым всё-таки. Начал, как всегда, с первой фазы - это стал FH Foam Buddy. Разводил 1:15 и 1:20. Пена хорошая (на кадрах вы видите концентрацию 1:20), тянет грязь и пахнет нормально: не вкусно, …
🔥16👍6custom 53550364566854221933custom 52109563069527589101
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @ps_detailing_pshik. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AbsolutCleanDeteiling” (@ps_detailing_pshik), 258 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ps_detailing_pshik.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.