Мысли про разные городские фестивали Что думаете?
🔥16❤8❤🔥5🎉2👎1

Channel
@pryaniki_po_120
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
824subscribers
+23 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001557043802 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pryaniki_po_120 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pryaniki_po_120 |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 39% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 07:16 | 824 | +4 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 02:19 | 820 | +21 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:05 | 799 | -3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:28 | 802 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:31 | 801 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:46 | 801 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 16 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
376 reactions across 8 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 138 | 36.7% | |
| ❤ | 86 | 22.9% | |
| 🤣 | 58 | 15.4% | |
| 🔥 | 54 | 14.4% | |
| 👍 | 21 | 5.59% | |
| ❤🔥 | 5 | 1.33% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 1.33% | |
| 🤡 | 4 | 1.06% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 0.532% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 0.532% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.266% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 376 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 16 March 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Мысли про разные городские фестивали Что думаете?
🔥16❤8❤🔥5🎉2👎1
Радуемся награде и благодарим нашу команду и наших гостей ❤️
🔥29❤9👍6
Пилик-пилик Соскучились? Пришло письмо от Роспотребнадзора, что мы выиграли в лотерею и в качестве приза к нам придёт внеплановая проверка. А сейчас такое время, что вот проверка прям совсем не кстати. Мягко говоря не до неё. Читаю письмо и про себя повторяю «хоть бы мошенники, хоть бы мошенники». Открываю вложение и 🥁🥁🥁 Бинго! Оплатите что-то там за что-то там. Уф, ещё никогда я не был так рад мошенникам. Пс.: н…
😁60❤19🤡4
Абсолютно случайно увидела сюжет о тортишной и досудебной претензии к ним от столичной кондитерской по печеньке - мишке с сердечком на канале гтрк кузбасс Вот тут подробнее о самом замесе Написала тут же Лехе Он грит, как такое возможно, почему все написали, дескать, мы живем в парадигме, что никто не смотрит вести - кузбасс. А оно вон чо! Переформатируем рекламные кампании, коллеги! И в сюжете просто виртуозно …
❤11🤣2
Такс, новости 30 мая запуск “Школы городских продюсеров”, где я (как оказалось) эксперт курса и буду вести один из модулей Курс будет длиться 10 недель, за это время вы получите работающий прототип продукта, упакованное предложение с бизнес-моделью и финансовым планом Для знакомства есть отличный способ: 26 мая открытый вебинар с продюсерами фестивалей, которые изменили восприятие целых территорий, на котором вы у…
👍13🔥9❤6
Соскучились по схемам мошенников? Держите! Вчера очередные дельцы замаскировались под аккаунт нашего бухгалтера в телеграм и написали мне, что нужно оплатить зарплатную ведомость на полтора миллиона. Не ведитесь! Может и к лучшему блокируют этот ваш телеграм, в максе мне такого не пишут.
🤣38❤14
Новый день, новые мошенники (но развод старый). Позвонили в новую Тортишную, представились Алексеем Поляковым (это я), попросили сотрудников сказать сколько в кассе налички. Дальше обычно идёт телега, что сейчас подскочит курьер и ему надо будет передать деньги. У нас до этого не дошло, наши ребята быстро распознали злодеев. На чем же они прикололись? Правильно! Какая нахуй наличка в кассе у общепита в 2026?
😁78❤10💯5
Я уже отправил распечатанную версию этого поста каждому подписчику в почтовый ящик. Сюда просто дублирую.
🤣18❤9👍2😭2
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @pryaniki_po_120. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Пряники Лёши Полякова” (@pryaniki_po_120), 824 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pryaniki_po_120.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.