3 measurements taken within a single day, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 559–565 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Aug 2026, 01:30
564
+4
8 Aug 2026, 03:34
560
no change
8 Aug 2026, 01:31
560
first reading
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
62.7%
avg views ÷ 564 subscribers
Avg views / post
354
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.74%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 12 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held
12 (6 July 2026 – 4 August 2026)
Views total
2,475
Reactions total
142
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 03:34 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
239 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
94
39.3%
❤
62
25.9%
👍
39
16.3%
❤🔥
29
12.1%
🥰
6
2.51%
⚡
3
1.26%
🤣
3
1.26%
🎉
2
0.837%
🤝
1
0.418%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 239reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 12 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @prtvn_distribution. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Срочный гайд для AI-артистов: Как не улететь в бан на стримингах за «спам»
Современные нейросети позволяют генерировать по десять отличных треков в день, а руки так и чешутся отгрузить их все сразу. Но стоп! Стриминговые платформы начали масштабную войну с AI-спамом, и правила игры резко ужесточились
Если вы не хотите, чтобы ваш личный кабинет заблокировали, а все выпущенные треки навсегда удалили с площадок, внимат…
🌞 Сегодня свой день рождения отмечает автор чартового хита «Тело похудело» — КОРЗА!
От всей души поздравляем! Желаем сумасшедшего вдохновения, таких же мощных релизов, миллионов слушателей и бесконечных творческих побед.
И, конечно, желаем, чтобы его тело никогда не покидала душа 🖤
PRTVN становится больше. И удобнее 🖤
Мы обновили систему услуг для ИИ-артистов.
Если раньше был один тариф, то теперь их три — чтобы каждый мог выбрать формат под свои задачи, а не переплачивать за то, что ему не нужно.
Что изменилось?
🖤 3 тарифа вместо одного
— для быстрого релиза;
— для тех, кому нужна дополнительная поддержка;
— для выпуска EP и альбомов.
🖤 Дополнительные услуги теперь можно заказать сразу при…
Друзья!
С 22 по 24 июля включительно служба поддержки PRTVN будет работать только через сообщения в Telegram-канале и через сайт prtvn.com.
Обратите внимание: модерация релизов продолжит работать в обычном режиме. Ограничения касаются только службы поддержки.
Если вы работаете через личного менеджера или руководителя и хотите обратиться к нему напрямую, пожалуйста, учтите, что ответ вы получите после 24 июля.
Спа…
Наши новые релизы в плейлистах Яндекс.Музыка🖤
DIMA GREK - А мы танцуем под дождём
Держим ритм
Rubinstein - Я НЕ БУДУ
Держим ритм
МаксониУральский - Дикие взгляды
Держим ритм
Тёплые новинки
Больше энергии
Compote (5 релизов):
Новая музыка: май 2026
Новая музыка: июнь 2026
Видеошоты
Видеошоты+тексты=💗
Спасибо, Яндекс.Музыка!
ИТОГИ КОНКУРСА ОТ PRTVN 🔥
А вот и наши победители:
1) Бесплатная дистрибуция на полгода на условиях артиста лейбла - ласкинбой
2) Бесплатная дистрибуция на 3 месяца на условиях артиста лейбла - Узники мыслей
3) Видеошот, обложка и синхронизированный текст для вашего релиза - Faezard
4) Видеошот и обложка - Шурик Кадам (Саша панDora) и Лиркан
5) Видеошот - SonaQ
Спасибо, что выбираете дистрибуцию от PRTVN 🖤
Конкурс подошёл к концу, всем спасибо за участие! 🖤
Результаты решили отложить до понедельника, чтобы сохранить интригу!
Надеемся, что вы круто проводите время в этот субботний вечер 🔥
Друзья, сегодня последний день конкурса от PRTVN! 🔥
Уже завтра мы будем готовы определить победителей. Также напоминаем: чем больше релизов Вы загрузили, тем больше шансов стать победителем в этом щедром конкурсе!
Последняя возможность стать победителем
Привет, наш дорогой любитель хорошей музыки!
Мы — ПРТВН
Делаем концерты по России, привозим классных артистов и собираем людей, которые любят живую музыку так же сильно, как и мы.
Здесь будем рассказывать о ближайших концертах, анонсировать новые события, делиться новостями и даже иногда делиться крутыми промокодами на концерты
Присоединяйся к нам, будет громко!
🎟 Ближайшие мероприятия:
Port Avenue | 27 августа…
Наши новые релизы в плейлистах 🖤
Port Avenue - Два десятка ножевых
Русские панельки
Рок отрыв!
Новый русский рок
Роковая любовь
хех)
На пульсе: рок
Русский рок в дорогу
Бейби-панк
Больше энергии
Compote - О тебе
Тёплые новинки
КОРЗА - Тело похудело
Новые таланты
100 инди-хитов
Zloy Rock - Это просто ветер
Альтернатива: лучшее
🔥16❤6❤🔥5🥰2👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @prtvn_distribution. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 343,311 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PRTVN MUSIC - Лейбл|Дистрибуция музыки” (@prtvn_distribution), 564 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prtvn_distribution.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.