Difendiamo la Vita, la Famiglia, il diritto dei bambini a una papà e una mamma, la Libertà Educativa dei genitori.
Dona ora: sostieni.provitaefamiglia.it
Created
1 May 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
25 measurements spanning 89 days, net -18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,783–6,820 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
3 Nov 2026, 02:09
6,787
-5
31 Oct 2026, 10:00
6,792
-4
28 Oct 2026, 17:18
6,796
-2
25 Oct 2026, 21:15
6,798
-1
23 Oct 2026, 02:56
6,799
+2
20 Oct 2026, 01:49
6,797
+1
17 Oct 2026, 03:36
6,796
+2
14 Oct 2026, 12:37
6,794
-5
11 Oct 2026, 09:59
6,799
+1
4 Oct 2026, 22:39
6,798
-6
25 Sept 2026, 21:58
6,804
+2
17 Sept 2026, 06:58
6,802
-10
13 Sept 2026, 12:38
6,812
-1
9 Sept 2026, 13:00
6,813
+2
4 Sept 2026, 12:22
6,811
+4
31 Aug 2026, 23:27
6,807
-2
29 Aug 2026, 05:03
6,809
-4
25 Aug 2026, 23:01
6,813
-3
23 Aug 2026, 04:08
6,816
+5
19 Aug 2026, 09:54
6,811
first reading
Engagement
74 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
25.8%
avg views ÷ 6,787 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,750
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.42%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 74 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held
74 (30 July 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total
40,252
Reactions total
974
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Nov 2026, 01:36 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,690
Videos
≈751
Links
≈3,920
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
37m 00s
Average length
1m 37s
Measured directly from 23 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,581 reactions across 71 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👏
1,565
43.7%
🙏
722
20.2%
🤬
456
12.7%
❤🔥
309
8.63%
🤮
144
4.02%
😢
85
2.37%
👌
76
2.12%
✍
75
2.09%
⚡
28
0.782%
😍
28
0.782%
😭
22
0.614%
😱
17
0.475%
🏆
10
0.279%
💯
7
0.195%
🙉
7
0.195%
🤣
6
0.168%
💔
4
0.112%
😡
4
0.112%
🥴
4
0.112%
🤔
3
0.084%
5 further kinds
9
0.251%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 74 of the 74 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,731 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 74 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 23 posts held from the last 30 days (13.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Hai il diritto di sapere cosa insegnano a tuo figlio a scuola, e di poter dire no.
Il consenso informato preventivo serve a questo: sapere prima, scegliere prima, non scoprire dopo a cose fatte. Per aiutarti a orientarti e a far valere il tuo diritto di priorità educativa, abbiamo preparato una guida che spiega cosa prevede la legge e come esercitare il tuo ruolo di genitore 📘
Scaricala subito: https://consensoinfo…
L'OMS è pronta a censurare sul Web i pro life. Lo ha rivendicato un suo portavoce.
Il rischio è che, anche grazie all’AI, verranno penalizzate le fonti e le notizie di chi difende la vita.
Leggi e condividi 👇
https://www.provitaefamiglia.it/blog/oms-censura-pro-vita-google-youtube-ia
Hai scaricato la Guida al Consenso Informato Preventivo? Adesso usiamola insieme al webinar di lunedì 16 novembre ore 21.00‼️
Siete più di 5.000 ad averla richiesta. Al webinar gratuito su Zoom, Maria Rachele Ruiu e Jacopo Coghe ve la spiegheranno nel dettaglio con casi concreti che possono capitare nella scuola dei tuoi figli e risponderanno alle vostre domande.
I posti sono limitati e le iscrizioni scadono il 13 …
Midterm Usa, gli americani bocciano l'ideologia gender: in quattro Stati passano i referendum a tutela degli sport femminili, in Colorado lo stop al "cambio di sesso" chirurgico sui minori.
Sull'aborto, invece resiste l'Idaho. Tutti i dettagli nell'articolo 👇
https://www.provitaefamiglia.it/blog/referendum-aborto-usa-midterm-2026-gender
La città di West Hollywood ha approvato, 5 a 0, un registro per le unioni di tre o più adulti. E non è stato specificato nessun limite al numero di partner 🇺🇸
Tutto è iniziato con l’incarico all’avvocato della città, poi un’ordinanza contro le discriminazioni, infine il registro. Si parte da un principio che nessuno vuole mettere in discussione, in questo caso la "discriminazione", e ci si costruisce sopra il resto,…
Sui figli «non si tratta di spese ma di investimenti». Parla Paolo Inselvini, europarlamentare di Fratelli d'Italia, a Pro Vita & Famiglia.
Al centro sostegno a natalità e famiglia nel prossimo bilancio Ue: la proposta ReBirth Eu arriva al Parlamento europeo. In preparazione un'interrogazione firmata da quasi tutto l'arco parlamentare.
Leggi e condividi👇
https://www.provitaefamiglia.it/blog/natalita-bilancio-ue-ins…
Le battaglie per la vita e per la famiglia si vincono con la costanza, e la costanza ha bisogno di tempo. Con un lascito solidale puoi scegliere oggi di sostenerle anche domani, dalla Casa di Chiara alle azioni legali accanto ai genitori. Non servono grandi patrimoni, non si pagano tasse di successione e la quota dei tuoi cari resta intatta.
Scopri come, in totale riservatezza e senza impegno👇
https://www.provitaefa…
🟢 VITTORIA!
Il Consiglio dei ministri ha deciso di portare davanti alla Corte costituzionale la legge regionale veneta sul fine vita. È esattamente quello che Pro Vita & Famiglia chiede dal giorno dell'approvazione, a inizio settembre, con una petizione che in pochi giorni ha raccolto oltre dodicimila firme di cittadini veneti, fino all'ultimo sit-in a Verona.
È una legge disumana, perché rischia di spingere verso …
Bologna, annullata la presentazione del libro-inchiesta di Alessandra Arachi sui "bambini trans".
Centri sociali e lobby Lgbtq+ hanno accusato di "transfobia" la firma progressista del "Corriere della Sera".
Noi vogliamo riportare questo tema a Bologna e chiederemo una legge contro il "cambio di sesso" dei minori.
Leggi e condividi 👇
https://www.provitaefamiglia.it/blog/bambini-trans-bologna-portiamo-inchiesta
Hanno censurato un’inchiesta sui “bambini trans”, ma noi non ci fermiamo nel denunciare questa totale assenza di dibattito democratico.
A Bologna, infatti, centri sociali e lobby Lgbtq+ hanno fatto annullare la presentazione del libro di Alessandra Arachi, accusando di “transfobia” quella che è a tutti gli effetti una firma progressista del “Corriere della Sera”.
Ora noi vogliamo tornare a Bologna e chiederemo una …
«I cittadini americani non vogliono maschi biologici nelle competizioni femminili e non vogliono la transizione di genere per i minori: la prova che queste non sono battaglie di parte, ma di civiltà e di buon senso.
Il woke è morto nonostante l’arretramento degli elettori del presidente Trump».
Così Jacopo Coghe, portavoce di Pro Vita & Famiglia, commenta i risultati dei referendum che si sono tenuti ieri in diversi…
Legge Sportiello: Va bene sostenere le mamme dopo il parto, ma anche prima!
Gilda Sportiello (M5S) propone una legge per sostenere le mamme dopo il parto. Giusto. Ma è la stessa deputata che ha definito «una molestia» il tentativo di convincere una donna a non abortire.
La maternità va sostenuta sempre, prima e dopo!
Leggi tutto l'articolo 👇 https://www.provitaefamiglia.it/blog/legge-post-part…
👏29🙏9⚡3
Showing the 12 most recent of 74 posts we hold for @provitaefamiglia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@provitaefamiglia named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@scegliamolavita named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Marco Mori @marcomoriofficial · 21,973 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 21 September 2026
CORVELVA @corvelva1993 · 37,162 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 1 September 2026
Protocolli CDS @protocolliCDS · 42,732 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 10 September 2026
Canale Comitato Fortitudo @comitatofortitudo · 52,713 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 24 August 2026
Paolo Bellavite @PaoloBellavite · 31,255 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 6 September 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Pro Vita & Famiglia” (@provitaefamiglia), 6,787 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/provitaefamiglia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.