Channel
@mondonuovo20
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,622subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001709045762 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mondonuovo20 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mondonuovo20 |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 00:57 | 3,622 | +9 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 21:19 | 3,613 | -2 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 04:55 | 3,615 | -16 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 18:20 | 3,631 | +2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 02:47 | 3,629 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 15:29 | 3,630 | +1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 23:56 | 3,629 | -2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 08:04 | 3,631 | +2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 03:02 | 3,629 | -5 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:48 | 3,634 | +3 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:26 | 3,631 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:20 | 3,632 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:14 | 3,630 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:48 | 3,630 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 5 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
646 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 211 | 32.7% | |
| ❤ | 178 | 27.6% | |
| 🤣 | 137 | 21.2% | |
| 🤮 | 113 | 17.5% | |
| 😢 | 6 | 0.929% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.155% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 646 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Non so voi, ma io sento di aver bisogno di una piccola pausa da tutte le brutture di questo Mondo Nuovo 2.0 (allego qui in foto un esempio random di tali brutture). Ho deciso che per un mesetto o due sospenderò le attività del canale e dei social, nonché la scrittura di nuovi video. Mi troverete comunque tutte le domeniche su No Limits Radio (a tal proposito nei prossimi giorni troverete sul canale le repliche di l…
❤89👍17
https://www.generazioned.org/disforia-di-genere-in-eta-evolutiva-300-professionisti-sanitari-italiani-firmano-primum-non-nocere/ Professionisti della salute o semplici cittadini pensanti, vi invito a firmare questa lettera di dissenso in merito alla guida gender per pediatri. Per firmare da "comuni cittadini" basta selezionare "altro" alla voce professione.
👍19❤6🤮2
Pensate che ci sono davvero persone che parlano in questo modo. Mi viene da decostruirmi subito.
🤣67🤮25❤2
Terragni alla Società di pediatria: “Impensabile una transizione sociale a tre anni” https://www.garanteinfanzia.org/terragni-alla-societa-di-pediatria-impensabile-una-transizione-sociale-a-tre-anni-2/
👍24❤5🤮3
La parola del giorno in Neolingua Gender è "BERRISEXUAL", che a quanto pare indicherebbe le persone che provano attrazione principalmente verso le "persone femminili e androgine" e solo occasionalmente verso le "persone mascoline". Buongiorno!
🤣42🤮14❤1
Vi aspetto oggi pomeriggio alle 15:30 su NO LIMITS RADIO con Il Mondo Nuovo 2.0. Oggi parleremo del caso Tickle v. Giggle, che vede protagonista un uomo (che si dichiara donna) che ha denunciato un'app per sole donne per discriminazione sulla base dell'identità di genere. Vi ricordo che la trasmissione sarà in replica alle 18:30 e che dalla settimana prossima su YouTube saranno disponibili tutte le repliche di giug…
❤8👍3
Transattivista-tipo: mi insulta sui social dandomi dell'odiatrice, dell'ignorante, spesso con insulti all'aspetto fisico. Io: oso rispondere con una faccina che ride Transattivista-tipo: "Ecco, vedi che con questi fobici bigotti non si può parlare, non hanno argomentazioni valide, non rispondono alle nostre lecite domande in buona fedeeeeh!!!!" Onestamente ci sono giorni in cui mi chiedo chi me lo fa fare 😂
❤37🤣26👍12👎1
https://youtube.com/shorts/lDedtXNUreY?is=OvuXZvFhk0xlJHXd
👍19🤮2
https://youtube.com/shorts/jelIAu-vzfw?is=o-r-1SP9IkqsNxtA
👍13🤮4❤2
Qui in foto solo alcuni esempi dell'enorme quantità di propaganda transfemminista che gira sui social. In questo periodo sono particolarmente agguerriti nel sostenere la causa dell'obbligo di "educazione sessuo-affettiva" (tradotto: propaganda ideologica) nelle scuole, fin dall'asilo. Vi interesserebbe un video che va a spiegare per bene tutte le argomentazioni di chi, desideroso di insegnare ai bambini "il consens…
👍51🤮17❤3
La pediatria si genuflette al gender: la nuova "guida" è totalmente antiscientifica - La Fionda https://www.lafionda.com/pediatria-gender-antiscientifica/?fbclid=Iwb21leAS53mNjbGNrBLnd2mV4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkDDM1MDY4NTUzMTcyOAABHkGFaGYCsqLAkjIoeFYV5imfC8tJvCjecccYYONteYwbKCVQ9kF_CgLY19HF_aem_T44gva1H4TMo1A_VwPwWvg
🤮33👍5❤1🤣1
Per chi fosse interessato, è ancora online la petizione di Pro Vita e Famiglia per il ritiro di questa guida. A me piacerebbe anche vedere un dibattito tra pediatri favorevoli e contrari a queste ideologie ma temo sia utopia.
👍21❤3🤣1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @mondonuovo20. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Il Mondo Nuovo 2.0” (@mondonuovo20), 3,622 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mondonuovo20.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.