Channel
@provida_cuba
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
79subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002333136401 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @provida_cuba |
| Description | Buscamos 🔍 la buena Vida de todo lo que constituya la raza humana desde Cuba hasta donde se alcance 🗺️🤰🏼🧬🎁 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/provida_cuba |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:31 | 79 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:30 | 79 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 28 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (28 January 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 150 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 19:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
⏯️ Para determinar que existe una adicción real y no solo un "uso intensivo", la investigación científica busca la presencia simultánea de los siguientes factores: 1. Pérdida de control (Compulsión) 2. Síndrome de abstinencia: Experimentación de malestar psicológico y físico profundo cuando no se tiene acceso al móvil 3. Tolerancia: Necesidad progresiva de pasar más tiempo usando el móvil 4. Relevancia o Dominanc…
Sobre las Adicciones 🛑
The shares total 159%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
*Abortado a las 16 semanas 💊🔪 ¡NUNCA EL BEBÉ ELIGIÓ ESE FUTURO!
Link 🔗 https://youtu.be/t7fdiKyZmE4
El bebé Fénix fue un aborto espontáneo a las 14 semanas Tenía 10 dedos Tenía 10 dedos del pie y uñas Tenía una nariz, pies y manos Su madre generosamente compartió sus fotos “ERA PERFECTO Lo extraño todos los días”
¿Es complicado adoptar en Cuba? 🇨🇺
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Posted without readable text
👉🏻 (En Cuba no se tiene el derecho a adoptar) sino más bien el derecho a ser adoptado cuándo hemos perdido lo que por naturaleza nos corresponde Al estado le corresponde restituir lo que el Niño a perdido un padre y una madre Obviamente en Cuba la familia a sido desfigurada y dos hombres o dos mujeres pueden aplicar a esta Oportunidad ⚠️
📝 Principio de la Adopción: *PROTEGER LA NIÑEZ ABANDONADA O EN DESAMPARO* 👦🏻 (No es satisfacer las necesidades de una familia de ser padres ya sea porque no pueden o porque lo deseen)
Es un Niño no una Decisión
Kely Zerial pidió no juzgar a la madre de una recién nacida abandonada en una bolsa frente a una casa en Brasil: “Nadie sabe si fue víctima de abuso, si fue violada o si es una adolescente” La bebé, cubierta de sangre pero con vida, fue llevada al hospital, donde confirmaron que estaba sana Al enterarse de que sería enviada a un albergue, Kely decidió adoptarla sin dudar. La empresaria, que ya buscaba ser madre, i…
🇬🇧 Wendy Duffy, una mujer británica de 56 años en buen estado de salud, morirá hoy mediante suicidio asistido en una clínica suiza. "Ya no siento ninguna alegría, no tengo ningún deseo de seguir viviendo", contó al Daily Mail. "No cambiaré de opinión. Alegraos por mí. Sé que moriré con una sonrisa en los labios" Pagó 10.000 libras para asegurar una plaza en Pegasos, una de las clínicas más controvertidas donde es p…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @provida_cuba. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Sobre las Adicciones 🛑
The shares total 159%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
¿Es complicado adoptar en Cuba? 🇨🇺
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 January 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 807,190 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PRO VIDA CUBA” (@provida_cuba), 79 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/provida_cuba.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.