проверка актива
🏆50
Channel
@proverkakirito
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
6subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003829185227 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @proverkakirito |
| Created | 2 March 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/proverkakirito |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:38 | 6 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 09:31 | 6 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 2 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
887 reactions across 11 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ⚡ | 184 | 20.7% | |
| ❤ | 182 | 20.5% | |
| 🏆 | 181 | 20.4% | |
| 💋 | 120 | 13.5% | |
| 🍓 | 93 | 10.5% | |
| 💯 | 79 | 8.91% | |
| ❤🔥 | 41 | 4.62% | |
| 💘 | 4 | 0.451% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.113% | |
| 🤮 | 1 | 0.113% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.113% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 887reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 2 March 2026 to 21 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
проверка актива
🏆50
3️⃣ 9️⃣
❤🔥41💋5❤2🥰1
1️⃣ 3️⃣ 0️⃣
🏆131🤮1😢1
1️⃣ 1️⃣ 3️⃣
💋114
1️⃣ 8️⃣ 3️⃣
⚡184
Новый список актив вз‼️ Владелец списка (sex_kirito) 1. @sex_kirito (24/7 в сети) 2. @sex_rafaelov 3. @kristall0va ( ахуенная взшка ) 4. @hz11q ( лучший вз ) 5. @kloyfuck (лучший в сфере) 6. @de1seez (новая вз, пиши скорее) 7. @sex_apostalll (лучший вз) 8. @goddestchapplin 9. @Kagatka10 (вишенка на торте) 10. @KCANAKC_B_KROBU(вз актив) 11. @norbkv 12. @yulishkaw_wii 13. @fuckvegass (актив вз) 14. @mistgloy (новый …
❤3💋1
юзы
9️⃣ 2️⃣
🍓93
проверка кирито pinned «Новый список актив вз‼️ Владелец списка (sex_kirito) 1. @sex_kirito (24/7 в сети) 2. @gsoas ( лучший вз в сфере ) 3. @wypou 4. @Motivaciya3 (Мотивация) 5. @kristall0va ( новая вз ) 6. @lichtochek 7. @oleswqnnxx (активная вз) 8. @sex_imperor (новый вз) 9.…»
Новый список актив вз‼️ Владелец списка (sex_kirito) 1. @sex_kirito (24/7 в сети) 2. @gsoas ( лучший вз в сфере ) 3. @wypou 4. @Motivaciya3 (Мотивация) 5. @kristall0va ( новая вз ) 6. @lichtochek 7. @oleswqnnxx (активная вз) 8. @sex_imperor (новый вз) 9. @irhdfgh (очень активная) 10. @alinuSv 11. @sex_rafaelov 12. @Love_Sekssc (лучший вз) 13. @Kagatka10 14. @p2shhok 15. @Alya_nwkq 16. @norbkv 17. @KCANAKC_B_KROBU(…
💘4
юзы сюда
7️⃣ 9️⃣
💯79
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @proverkakirito. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,354,748 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@proverkakirito named 10 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“проверка кирито” (@proverkakirito), 6 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/proverkakirito.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.