Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Дневник Проценко

@protsenko_notes

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

105subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002847036452
TypeChannel
Username@protsenko_notes
DescriptionПишу обо всём, что мне интересно. Иногда не пишу. Обратная связь — @Nikita_Protsenko
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/protsenko_notes

Growth

1057 August 2026 — 105 subscribers9 August 2026 — 105 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 104–106 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 08:47105no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:34105first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 3 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
129
Videos
41
Links
40

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
20m 50s
Average length
20m 50s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

135 reactions across 7 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥4835.6%
3626.7%
🥰2317.0%
😁128.89%
🤔64.44%
😱32.22%
🤩32.22%
😢21.48%
👌10.741%
🙏10.741%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 135reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 3 June 2026 to 10 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Jul 2026, 07:19 UTC87 views23 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

С коллегами приняли участие в форуме «Мастерская профилактики», который прошел на Ростов Арене. 3 дня, но по ощущениям, словно месяц. Плотная программа: лекции, практика, кофебрейки и интерактивные зоны. Люди со всех регионов РФ. Непередаваемая атмосфера, гора позитивных эмоций и новых контактов в телефонной книге. Фотографий с фуршета еще нет (честно говоря и смотреть их побаиваюсь), полагаю для них нужен будет

🔥127😱3🤩1

9 Jun 2026, 08:52 UTC≈3,280 views36 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Заглянул в эфир радио «Новороссия Сегодня». Поговорили с Натальей Андреевой про медиабезопасность, подростков, интернет и те самые маркеры вовлечения в деструктивные сообщества. Слегка переживал, местами тупил, но, в целом, – норм. Надо почаще выступать спикером...

14🔥13🥰8🙏1

8 Jun 2026, 16:01 UTC155 views18 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Видали, я сегодня про инцелелов написал, и тут же их предложили признать экстремистами? Читают, получается? 😁 Если не лень, реакций потыкайте плз

😁7🔥6🥰3🤩2

8 Jun 2026, 08:14 UTC126 views18 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Приветствую, коллеги. Завтра в 08:10 по МСК буду на РАДИО «НОВОРОССИЯ СЕГОДНЯ» (93,4 FM). Поговорим о деструктивных сообществах, медиабезопасности и прочих радостях интернета. Если вдруг захотите услышать, как человек добровольно рассказывает про интернет-угрозы в восемь утра — подключайтесь. А пока вот вам мем.

10🥰4🔥2🤔2

5 Jun 2026, 13:20 UTC107 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @media_guardPhoto

⚠️ Большинство родителей узнают о проблеме тогда, когда она уже стала очевидной. Но тревожные сигналы появляются гораздо раньше: скрытность, ночные переписки, резкая смена окружения, странный контент в соцсетях, замкнутость и не только. Мы создали бесплатный бот-тест, который поможет оценить, есть ли поводы для беспокойства. 🛡 14 вопросов ⏱ Всего 3 минуты 📊 Результат по шкале от 0 до 10 📌 Рекомендации по даль

🔥93🥰2👌1

4 Jun 2026, 16:34 UTC99 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @media_guardPhoto

Трагедия в двух актах 🤷‍♂️

😁5🤔4🥰3😢2

3 Jun 2026, 16:09 UTC106 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @media_guardPhoto

Все знают про группы смерти и запрещённые организации. Но есть целый пласт угроз, которые маскируются под безобидные жанры — фанфики, аниме, игровые фандомы. 📌Разбираем в карточках. Источник: Справочник специалиста в сфере медиабезопасности / под ред. В. Д. Никишина. М.: InfotropicMedia, 2025. — Карта информационных угроз медиабезопасности (МГЮА). * «ЛГБТ» признано экстремистским и запрещено на территории РФ.

🔥6🥰32

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @protsenko_notes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 392,951 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Дневник Проценко” (@protsenko_notes), 105 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/protsenko_notes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.