Photo, posted without a caption
Signed orbitant

Channel
@protocallasia
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
384subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001395773772 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @protocallasia |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 7 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/protocallasia |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 04:43 | 384 | +1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:28 | 383 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:05 | 387 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:00 | 387 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed orbitant
85 critical bugs flagged across 390 Bitcoin-related projects in under 24 hours, with AI tools running at roughly $10,000/day in compute costs.
Signed orbitant
ETH/BTC
❤1
Signed orbitant
Btc (D) - probably breakout if Clarity Act approve.
❤1
Signed orbitant
In 1971, the US left the gold standard. The federal debt at the time was $400 billion. Today US debt is approaching $40 trillion. An increase of nearly 10,000%. Maybe this is why the average fiat currency dies in 27 years.
Signed orbitant
https://www.binance.com/en/academy/articles/what-is-phishing
Signed orbitant
Chinese investors are rotating back into gold: China's gold-backed ETFs have recorded 14 consecutive daily inflows ending Monday, the longest streak since March. Over this period, these funds have attracted +$1.2 billion. The largest single-day inflow during this streak totaled +$370 million. Before this rebound, China's gold-backed ETFs recorded outflows in 38 of 44 trading sessions. This comes as elevated vola…
Signed orbitant
THIS IS INSANE. The US Treasury Secretary left his notepad open for photographers on purpose so the market would see what he was about to do. At Friday's cabinet meeting, reporters photographed Scott Bessent's to-do list. It read "Buy Japanese Yen (JPY) $5-10 bil." He confirmed it was deliberate on CNBC: "I just wanted to make sure that all the reporters looking on, over my shoulder, also knew the symbol 'JPY' for…
Signed orbitant
Putin has signed Russia's first comprehensive crypto law. The Law on Digital Currencies and Digital Rights takes effect September 1, 2026. What it does: - Recognises digital currency as property - Creates a licensed exchange market supervised by the Central Bank - Sets up digital depositories to record who owns what - Regulates mining, custody and digital financial assets Retail investors must pass a knowledge te…
Signed orbitant
Morgan Stanley mapped out the entire AI infrastructure supply chain and it reveals who actually gets paid at every layer of the trillion dollar buildout (Save this). This heatmap breaks the AI infrastructure value chain into two dimensions those who owns and operates the data centers at the top and what physical and technical components get built underneath to make those data centers function. At the top sit the ow…
Signed orbitant
THE US GOVERNMENT IS RUNNING QE WITHOUT CALLING IT QE The US deficit is projected at $1.9 trillion this year, or 5.8% of GDP. More than half of it is now being funded with short-term Treasury bills instead of long-term bonds. By July 2026, the Treasury had issued $413 billion in net new bills, already 15% more than in all of 2025. Why this matters. Long-term bonds carry more risk. The 30-year is at 5.23%, its hi…
Signed orbitant
🌌🦉 orbitant's Market Intelligence Report 05/08/2026, 18:05:14 (GMT+8) LIVE MARKET SNAPSHOT Total crypto cap: $2.27T | 24h volume: $54.63B Dominance: BTC 56.5% | ETH 9.9% Fear & Greed: 27 — Fear MAJORS BTC/USDT: $64,177.56 (+1.02% 24h) | Vol $804.96M ETH/USDT: $1,872.51 (+0.86% 24h) | Vol $345.61M BNB/USDT: $597.03 (+1.42% 24h) | Vol $67.04M SOL/USDT: $74.04 (+1.16% 24h) | Vol $99.82M XRP/USDT: $1.06 (-0.77…
Signed orbitant
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @protocallasia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ProtoCall (Official)” (@protocallasia), 384 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/protocallasia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.