«Мы придём за тобой, Атиф Наджиб! Мы притащим твою голову!» (Арабское «наджиб» здесь обыгрывает имя палача Даръа и означает «достанем / притащим») Даръа, 2011 год 🔵 Protest Syria | Protest Live
🔥21❤6👎5👍3👏2🎉1💯1🤡1

Channel
@protest_syria
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
8,132subscribers
-12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001629947856 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @protest_syria |
| Description | Независимый взгляд на ситуацию на Ближнем Востоке - Актуальные новости - Освещение событий - Аналитика Основной канал — https://t.me/+NzlDxigayiVjYzQ0 |
| Created | 5 July 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/protest_syria |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:01 | 8,132 | -11 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:30 | 8,143 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:00 | 8,144 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:55 | 8,144 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (12 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 34,350 |
| Reactions total | 567 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 16:44 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
791 reactions across 13 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 180 | 22.8% | |
| 🤡 | 163 | 20.6% | |
| 🔥 | 84 | 10.6% | |
| 😢 | 60 | 7.59% | |
| 🤬 | 53 | 6.70% | |
| ❤ | 44 | 5.56% | |
| 🤔 | 39 | 4.93% | |
| 👎 | 37 | 4.68% | |
| 🥴 | 22 | 2.78% | |
| 🤷♂ | 21 | 2.65% | |
| 🤯 | 20 | 2.53% | |
| 💯 | 19 | 2.40% | |
| 🤣 | 13 | 1.64% | |
| 👏 | 10 | 1.26% | |
| 🌚 | 6 | 0.759% | |
| ⚡ | 5 | 0.632% | |
| 🤨 | 5 | 0.632% | |
| 🎉 | 4 | 0.506% | |
| 😱 | 4 | 0.506% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 0.253% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 791reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
«Мы придём за тобой, Атиф Наджиб! Мы притащим твою голову!» (Арабское «наджиб» здесь обыгрывает имя палача Даръа и означает «достанем / притащим») Даръа, 2011 год 🔵 Protest Syria | Protest Live
🔥21❤6👎5👍3👏2🎉1💯1🤡1
Двоюродный брат Башара Атыф Наджиб оказался менее удачливым и не успел сбежать после падения режима Асада. Суд приговорил его к смертной казни... 🔵 Protest Syria | Protest Live
🔥46👍13👎5🎉2🤬2❤1👏1🤡1
🇸🇾 Сирийский суд заочно приговорил Башара и Махера Асада к смертной казни Четвёртый уголовный суд Дамаска вынес смертный приговор бывшему президенту Сирии Башару Асаду, признав его виновным в умышленных убийствах, в том числе детей, а также пытках. Его брат Махер Асад также приговорён к смертной казни. Суд признал его виновным в умышленных убийствах, пытках и подстрекательстве. Поскольку оба находятся за пределами…
👍36🔥12🤡9❤4👎1👏1🤣1
✍ Сейчас в сирийском сегменте обсуждаются 2 возможные причины тревоги в сирийской армии. Первая версия — конфликт между руководством армии и командиром 62-й дивизии Мухаммадом аль-Джасимом, более известным как Абу Амша. По данным ряда источников, он отказался вывести своих командиров из провинции Хама для их последующего перевода в другие регионы. Также сообщается, что Абу Амша мог быть задержан во время совещания в…
🤔19❤6🤡5💯4🤣3⚡1👍1
❗Срочно: Сирийская армия отдала приказ всем подразделениям полностью укомплектовать снаряжение и привести уровень боевой готовности к максимальному уровню 🔵 Protest Syria | Protest Live
👍21🤯9🤔8🤡8🔥3🤨3👏2🤣2
МВД Сирии опубликовало кадры рейдов, проведённых сотрудниками сил безопасности против ячеек ИГ в восточной части провинции Алеппо. По данным ведомства, операция была проведена на основе разведывательной информации. В ходе обысков силовики обнаружили тайник с оружием и самодельными взрывными устройствами 🔵 Protest Syria | Protest Live
🤡29👍23👎3❤2🌚2🔥2🤔2🤨1
✍ Для многих остаётся загадкой, как курды сохранили контроль над лагерем Родж несмотря на интеграцию в сирийское правительство и армию. Причём интеграция на уровне армии подтверждается фактами — многие курдские боевики уже прошли боевую подготовку и заступили на службу в сирийской армии 🔵 Protest Syria | Protest Live
💯14🤬10🤷♂10⚡1👏1🤔1🤡1🤯1
⚡️Новая волна насилия в лагере Родж на северо-востоке Сирии По информации источников внутри лагеря, курды применили силу против женщин и детей, а также открыли интенсивный огонь на территории лагеря. Сообщается, что один ребёнок получил огнестрельное ранение в голову и был экстренно госпитализирован. Также несколько женщин подверглись жестокому избиению. Сотрудники лагеря угрожали женщинам, заявив, что лагерь «стан…
🤬36😢5❤2👏2🤯2🕊1🤔1🤷♂1
Недалеко от Сухны произошла ужасная авария. Два пассажирских автобуса столкнулись на трассе Дейр-эз-Зор - Пальмира. Среди погибших женщины и дети 🔵 Protest Syria | Protest Live
😢54🤯3❤2🤬2🤷♂2⚡1🕊1😱1
Сирийские власти сообщили о перехвате крупной партии оружия, которая, по их данным, предназначалась для «Хезболлы» в Ливане. По информации МВД Сирии, недалеко от границы с Ираком силовики остановили подозрительный автомобиль и обнаружили в нём дальнобойные ракеты, противотанковые ракетные комплексы и беспилотники 🔵 Protest Syria | Protest Live
👍26🤡22👎7🤔6❤4🥴2⚡1🌚1
Сирия — страна контрастов. Сегодня на первом заседании Народного совета присутствовали: актриса, депутат курдского происхождения, и вдова Абу Умара Саракиба — одного из наиболее известных командиров сирийской гражданской войны, погибшего при авиаударе США в 2016 году. 🔵 Protest Syria | Protest Live
🤡21🥴20❤12🤷♂7👍6🤯4👎3⚡1
Президент Сирии Ахмад аш-Шараа выступил с первой речью перед Народным советом, призвав к единству, консультациям и восстановлению страны. Основные тезисы: — Подчеркнул, что человечество всегда стремилось найти наилучшие способы управления обществом, а обмен мнениями и принцип консультации играют в этом ключевую роль. — Заявил, что взаимное согласие и коллективное принятие решений помогают избежать раскола, способс…
🤡39👍27👎7🤣3❤2🌚2🤨1🤯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @protest_syria. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 220,081 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Protest | Сирия” (@protest_syria), 8,132 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/protest_syria.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.