Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Простые Красители

@prostye_krasiteli

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

565subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001700437576
TypeChannel
Username@prostye_krasiteli
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/prostye_krasiteli

Growth

5595655626 August 2026 — 559 subscribers6 August 2026 — 559 subscribers13 August 2026 — 565 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 558–566 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 00:45565+6
6 Aug 2026, 18:16559no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:23559first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 26 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
28.9%
avg views ÷ 565 subscribers
Avg views / post
164
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 July 2026
Posts held12 (26 June 202621 July 2026)
Views total1,308
Reactions total136
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 18:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

202 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥10150.0%
8843.6%
🥰41.98%
👏31.49%
❤‍🔥20.99%
💯20.99%
👀10.495%
👌10.495%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 202reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 21 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Jul 2026, 17:20 UTC141 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Когда мы говорим «градиент», чаще всего представляем плавный переход от светлого к тёмному. Но это только один из вариантов: градиенты могут быть одноцветными, двухцветными и более сложными. Если градиент строится из цвета в цвет, важно учитывать, как эти цвета смешиваются между собой. Если они близкие и родственные, переход может быть длинным, мягким и чистым. Если цвета контрастные, переходная зона будет сложнее:

15

21 Jul 2026, 13:05 UTC145 views32 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Несмотря на все сложности, которые сейчас возникают вокруг работы маркетплейсов, мы продолжаем работать в обычном режиме. Заказы собираются и отправляются. Красители есть в наличии. Мы заранее выстроили работу так, чтобы не зависеть только от складов маркетплейсов: часть заказов отправляется с площадок, часть — напрямую с нашего склада. Поэтому даже если на отдельных площадках или складах возникнут перебои, мы сможе

32

19 Jul 2026, 19:40 UTC159 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Пока болельщики всего мира наблюдают за тем, кто станет обладателем титула чемпиона мира по футболу, мы делимся с вами новым видео — окрашиванием в стиральной машине красителем из новой линейки ProReactive+! Окрашиваем белый хлопковый жакет в оттенок 167 Пыльный розовый. Изделие — 100% хлопок. Окрашивание — полностью по инструкции, никаких хитростей. ProReactive+ — это новая линейка тёплых активных красителей для

8🔥7

17 Jul 2026, 19:27 UTC174 viewsread 6 August 2026

Кстати, здесь 👇 показаны распады коричневых цветов ProReactive+ в ледяной технике. Сразу после таяния льда, результат фиксировался нагреванием микроволновой печи.

17 Jul 2026, 19:27 UTC197 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Параллельно с разработкой новых цветов для ProReactive, мы создаём кое-что совершенно новое.. Такого вы точно ещё не пробовали.. Тестируем, дорабатываем. Скоро покажем больше..

🔥17❤‍🔥2

17 Jul 2026, 19:23 UTC168 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

И помните, что: 👇😉

🔥5💯21

17 Jul 2026, 18:04 UTC156 views25 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня в каталоге появилась новая линейка — ProReactive+. Мы шли к этому долго, и очень рады, что наконец можем её представить. Немного о том, зачем она нужна — ведь красителей у нас уже достаточно. В каталоге уже есть линейка ProReactive — холодные активные красители, дихлортриазиновые. Хороши для ярких и чистых цветов, но у них есть объективные ограничения: сложно получить стабильные нейтральные оттенки, приглуш

🔥183🥰3👀1

16 Jul 2026, 18:36 UTC168 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Кроссовки — не самый очевидный объект для окрашивания. В этот раз мы кастомизировали Nike красителями и сделали яркий градиент: оранжевый + фиолетовый. В одной паре могут сочетаться разные материалы: текстильные вставки (полиамид, полиэстер), искусственная кожа, силиконовые, резиновые и пластиковые детали. Поэтому результат не всегда можно предсказать: одни участки окрашиваются ярко, другие почти не меняют цвет. Дл

🔥20👌1🥰1

9 Jul 2026, 16:37 UTC285 views28 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Можно ли окрашивать капроновые колготки? Да! И это очень просто. Капрон — это полиамид, а полиамид окрашивается всеми красителями из нашего ассортимента. Для этого окрашивания мы выбрали ProFiberSet как наиболее стойкие и простые в обращении красители с большой палитрой оттенков. Колготки весят совсем немного, поэтому точное количество порошка отмерять неудобно. Можно сделать проще: приготовить раствор красителя.

🔥199

6 Jul 2026, 10:49 UTC310 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Всем привет! Небольшой анонс👆 На фестивале Бессонница в этом году проведу два мастер-класса по тай-даю: 9 июля в 15.00 в пространстве "Безделика" 11 июля в 10.00 в пространстве "Ярмарка керамики. Открытые мастерские" Приходите! Будем красить носки в разные цвета, чтобы по утрам не искать одинаковые! Огромное спасибо за предоставление красителей для проведения мастер-классов "Простые красители" @prostye_krasiteli

10

6 Jul 2026, 10:49 UTC271 viewsread 6 August 2026

Мастер-классы на фестивале «Бессонница» от Михаила @antiage60! Кто собирается посетить, обязательно загляните!

26 Jun 2026, 10:20 UTC378 views28 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Привет всем! Не потеряли? Посвятили эти дни проработке карточек товаров на маркетплейсах для линейки ProReactive . Показалось, что информация может быть полезна и здесь. Карточки постепенно обновляем, это займёт ещё несколько дней. Сохраняйте, если полезно!

🔥1510👏3

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @prostye_krasiteli. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 328,532 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Простые Красители” (@prostye_krasiteli), 565 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prostye_krasiteli.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.