Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ПРОСТО КАТЯ

Channel

ПРОСТО КАТЯ

@prosto_kats

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,922subscribers

-188 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002056593522
TypeChannel
Username@prosto_kats
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/prosto_kats

Growth

7,9228,1108,0167 August 2026 — 8,110 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,110 subscribers8 August 2026 — 8,103 subscribers11 August 2026 — 8,080 subscribers14 August 2026 — 8,041 subscribers17 August 2026 — 8,014 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,998 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,976 subscribers27 August 2026 — 7,942 subscribers30 August 2026 — 7,922 subscribers7 August 202630 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 23 days, net -188. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,894–8,138 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 19:147,922-20
27 Aug 2026, 21:387,942-34
24 Aug 2026, 15:257,976-22
20 Aug 2026, 18:027,998-16
17 Aug 2026, 23:458,014-27
14 Aug 2026, 21:088,041-39
11 Aug 2026, 12:038,080-23
8 Aug 2026, 06:528,103-7
7 Aug 2026, 18:018,110no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:548,110first reading

Engagement

31 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.5%
avg views ÷ 7,922 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,470
28 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.79%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
28
of 31 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held31 (2 August 202627 August 2026)
Views total41,133
Reactions total2,380
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 19:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 47s
Average length
27s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,551 reactions across 31 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,28750.5%
🔥28911.3%
❤‍🔥28011.0%
💘1857.25%
🥰1244.86%
🤯813.18%
🦄512.00%
😢481.88%
👍331.29%
🍓281.10%
💔271.06%
😁240.941%
👀180.706%
💋150.588%
😍130.51%
🤣90.353%
👎80.314%
60.235%
🍌50.196%
🕊40.157%
11 further kinds160.627%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,551 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Aug 2026, 16:58 UTC953 views116 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Я просто в шоке как мне идет красный 😍

🔥7421❤‍🔥10🥰6😍4🦄1

26 Aug 2026, 15:31 UTC≈1,190 views73 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Если меня видели соседи, они 100% думали что я изгоняю из себя демонов 🥲 Но на самом деле я нашла для себя просто суперское решение как проживать эмоции и почувствовать свое тело в моменте Потому что обычно в тенце, мы пытаемся прям выглядеть супер кошечками, а тут ты просто закрываешь глаза и делаешь всю дичь, которую чувствуешь телом. Выглядит конечно странно, но жить после этого становится на много легче ❤️

56😍8❤‍🔥3🥴3🥰2🦄1

25 Aug 2026, 18:19 UTC≈1,200 views48 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

35🦄6🔥5🍓1🕊1

25 Aug 2026, 18:19 UTC≈1,180 views45 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

31🔥4🦄4❤‍🔥3🍓1💋1🕊1

25 Aug 2026, 18:19 UTC≈1,160 views44 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

22🦄12🔥5❤‍🔥3🍓1🕊1

25 Aug 2026, 18:15 UTC≈1,140 views46 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

33🔥5🦄4❤‍🔥2🍓1🕊1

25 Aug 2026, 18:05 UTC≈1,160 views95 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Решила купить себе бордовую тушь, говорят очень идет карим глазам, что думаете? Идет? Или коричневая лучше?

🥰5722🔥9❤‍🔥2💘2🦄2🍓1

24 Aug 2026, 17:47 UTC≈1,290 views61 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🤯37164❤‍🔥2🤣1🦄1

24 Aug 2026, 17:46 UTC≈1,260 views61 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🤯3715🤣42❤‍🔥1👍1🦄1

24 Aug 2026, 15:57 UTC≈1,320 views132 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Сняли с Владом просто красивенный отель в центре Питера, всегда мечтала переночевать где-то тут 🥺 А он прикиньте, запомнил и снял, после фразы, что я хочу фотосессию на балконе. Так что ждите, сейчас будет лютый дроп пинтерест фотографий от туда! Мне кажется получилось очень красиво, Влад с каждым днем фоткает все лучше и лучше ☝️ Но единственный минус, что я точно поняла, что в центре жить невозможно… Там на столь

102🔥11🥰10❤‍🔥5👏1💘1🦄1😍1

23 Aug 2026, 13:18 UTC≈1,470 views84 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Решили наконец-токи провести выходные вне дома и пойти в караоке 🎤 Честно, я думала что в Питере много караоке с отдельными комнатами, где можно просто в тупую попеть, но оказалось что это мало того что стоит как крыло самолета, так еще и штук их 7 на весь город Так что сохраняйте, называется малина 😅 Да, кринж, но там прикольно

61❤‍🔥11👍5💘5🥰1🦄1

22 Aug 2026, 12:58 UTC≈1,240 views140 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

Иногда правильней не поменять человека, а поменять человека ✨ Да, да, когда-то я объясняла что не обязательно дарить 101 розу раз в год и что женщины получают больше удовольствия от постоянных маленьких подарков, чем от одного большого раз в миллион лет

98❤‍🔥22🔥13💘4🦄2🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @prosto_kats. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 574,928 of 1,629,362 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

annyawell
@annyawell_gg · 66,115
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ПРОСТО КАТЯ” (@prosto_kats), 7,922 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prosto_kats.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.