Posted without readable text

Channel
The Prophet
@prophetcall
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
84subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001973408314 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @prophetcall |
| Description | Crypto news and update |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 29 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/prophetcall |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:17 | 84 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:34 | 84 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 29 September 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 November 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 18
- Videos
- 3
- Links
- 50
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 8s
- Average length
- 8s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Alpha project. Red Panda dev, ATH hit billion mcap t.me/daorium FairLaunch today. Stay tuned
LEXIA Buy! 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢 💵 0.03 BNB ($7.33) 🪙 1,980,000 LEXIA 🔶 0x1ec9…26fa | Txn 🔼 Position +11% 🔼 Market Cap $3,355 🦎 Chart 🔵 Trade 🔸 Trending
Good Info, Good Launch with Based Dev Green Floki dev. Prev very Amazing and hit million Market looks good , its time to old player coming back to make BSC great again. Lets support this on t.me/daorium
LEXIA Buy! 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢 💵 0.152 BNB ($35.09) 🪙 4,481,830 LEXIA 🔶 0xbe83…2331 | Txn ✅ New Holder 🔼 Market Cap $7,260 🤖 Biggest Buy Comp Prize 0.5 BNB ⏳ Ends in 23 hours 24 min 56 sec /comp 🦎 Chart 🔵 Trade 🔸 Trending 🔶 Trending 🥇 BSC TRENDING
LEXIA Buy! 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢 💵 0.125 BNB ($28.52) 🪙 7,476,195 LEXIA 🔶 0xc388…f684 | Txn ✅ New Holder 🔼 Market Cap $3,558 🦎 Chart 🔵 Trade 🔸 Trending
The Prophet pinned «Lexia Chain, SUPERb Based and Safe dev Past project Hit 490K and 50K. Dev said to me. Will make this , flying more than 200K Serious project and i am aped my max bag here Ca : 0x1a8cf17dbf3f72cc079f1972715a961d5941df73 Mcap 3K Tomorrow Marketing start…»
Lexia Chain, SUPERb Based and Safe dev Past project Hit 490K and 50K. Dev said to me. Will make this , flying more than 200K Serious project and i am aped my max bag here Ca : 0x1a8cf17dbf3f72cc079f1972715a961d5941df73 Mcap 3K Tomorrow Marketing start t.me/lexiachain Liquidity locked for 2 month and will be extended
🩸Take care about this old Trump feed him and will run about 1M🩸 Are u willing to take the risk? We are here to make your halloween great again If you join, you are safe. Launching on Saturday 29.10.2023 hours 21:00: https://t.me/Trumpkin1
Virtu Chain Buy! 🟢🔵🟢🟢🔵🟢🟢🔵🟢🟢🔵🟢🟢🔵🟢 💵 0.026 BNB ($5.42) 🪙 2,430,000 VIRTU 🔶 0x6736…4362 | Txn 🔼 Position +14.1% 🔼 Market Cap $2,025 🦎 Chart 🔵 Trade 🤖 Snipe 🔸 Trending
Next hidden gem . Prev mote than 5M Let see, and support this one. Amazing dev here t.me/virtuchain Dyor
GRIM Buy! 💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀 Spent: 0.2948 WBNB ($61.07) Got: 10,000,000 GRIM Buyer Position: ⬆️ 119.05%! Buyer Holdings: 18,400,000 GRIM ($118.42) Buyer Funds: $556.17 DEX: PancakeSwap Holders Count: 89 Price: 0.00000003106 WBNB ($0.000006436) MarketCap: $6,436 TX | Swap | Chart | Trending Powered by @BubbleBuyBot
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @prophetcall. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@BSCTRENDING · 31,8896 postsCognetix News [ Portal ]
@Cognetixportal · 1333 posts@buytech Tracker (LIVE)
@BuyBotTracker · 15,5412 postsBlockichain Protocol | zero tax
@blockichain · 281 postBubbleBuyBot Trending
@BubbleBuyBotTrending · 26,4081 postLEXIA BLOCKCHAIN
@LexiaChain · 521 postMaestro
@maestro · 39,1461 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 6
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 6
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@prophetcall named 6 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Prophet” (@prophetcall), 84 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prophetcall.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.