Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Προοπτική Βάτραχου

@prooptiki

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

235subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001862124387
TypeChannel
Username@prooptiki
DescriptionProoptiki Vatrachou, a frog's eye view. We find good technical/sciency videos about random stuff and post them here. Suggestions and feedback: post in the comments to any video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GkbMQILr25Q
Created10 December 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/prooptiki

Growth

2356 Aug 2026, 22:01 — 235 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 02:46 — 235 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 22:017 Aug 2026, 02:46
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 234–236 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 02:46235no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:01235first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
237
Videos
339
Links
837

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

32 reactions across 10 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯928.1%
721.9%
🔥721.9%
😨39.38%
😭26.25%
custom 598328227821676463313.13%
13.13%
👍13.13%
🤩13.13%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 February 2026 to 18 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Jun 2026, 07:11 UTC153 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @egregore_killerPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥2

18 Jun 2026, 07:11 UTC157 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @egregore_killerFile

File, posted without a caption

29 May 2026, 15:50 UTC235 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @polinashkapinaPhoto

«Энергомаш №1» Холст/масло 70×55 2024

3🔥2

3 May 2026, 22:03 UTC288 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @antichirstVideo

Video, posted without a caption

💯9

19 Apr 2026, 12:19 UTC311 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🔥 Insanely good video. No dry math, very visual. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9HIy5dJE-zQ

custom 59832822782167646331

21 Mar 2026, 08:29 UTC349 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Всем хороших выходных! 😑

😨3😭2

20 Mar 2026, 19:17 UTC278 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

We'll deviate today from our usual topics and post this bit of hard sci-fi art https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sawCJESqqeU

🤩1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @prooptiki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Προοπτική Βάτραχου” (@prooptiki), 235 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prooptiki.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.