Channel
@proofJaLangn
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 22 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004362270467 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @proofJaLangn |
| Created | 21 October 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 22 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/proofJaLangn |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (qwen3.6:35b-a3b, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 5 November 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 04:40 | 2 | -1 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 04:22 | 3 | no change |
| 22 Oct 2026, 03:47 | 3 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 21 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (21 October 2026 – 21 October 2026) |
| Views total | 593 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Oct 2026, 04:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 11 posts held from the last 30 days (27.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
HELP RETURN @JaLangn ‼️ Teman-teman, mohon bantuannya untuk subs @JaLangn dan pasang DN return @JaLangn ke @pLentik agar username tersebut bisa kembali ke cust aku yang sudah melunasi pembayaran. Bantu forward broadcast ini juga yaa. Terima kasih atas bantuannya! 😭🙏🏻 Kronologi https://t.me/JaLangnn/2
Sticker, posted without a caption
Aku minta tolong banget ya, teman-teman. Bantu subs dan pasang DN “return @JaLangn ke @pLentik” yaa. Makasih banyak sebelumnya buat teman-teman yang udah mau bantu. Semoga username-nya bisa segera balik ke cust aku. Maaci banyakkk! 😭😭😭
5. Yang keep clearchat dan tiba2 aku dituduh penipu sm org lain.
4. Bukti cust bilang aman + orang yg keep mau balikin.
3. Bukti cust ku bilang bisa kak + say thanks
2. Bukti cust ku melakukan pelunasan + sinyalku yang jelek.
1. Bukti cust ku mau lunasin dan dia setuju melakukan sistem lepas usn.
Bukti Kronologi
Hi, aku @rengganisy, owner sebelumnya dari username @JaLangn. Jadi, ada customer aku yang membeli username @JaLangn dengan sistem cicilan. Setelah melakukan pembayaran secara bertahap, akhirnya customer aku sudah melunasi pembayaran tersebut 2 hari yang lalu. Setelah lunas, aku menanyakan kepada customer apakah ingin menggunakan sistem lepas-pasang username atau username-nya dipindahkan ke channel. Sebagai informas…
Channel created
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @proofJaLangn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“@JaLangn tolong dibalikin ke @pLentik” (@proofJaLangn), 2 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/proofJaLangn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.