Слова «child модно заменить на любое кого берете вторым на фото, cat, dog и тд» Surreal mid-century editorial illustration of an eccentric version of the person in the photo and a child inside a stylish restaurant, elongated proportions, exaggerated narrow faces, deadpan expressions, oversized accessories, bizarre fashionable atmosphere, painterly brush textures, distorted anatomy, subtle lowbrow surrealism, sophist…

Channel
"AI Промты" rimma_brylik
@promt_rimma_brylik
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry
328subscribers
-10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003106195918 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @promt_rimma_brylik |
| Created | Between 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/promt_rimma_brylik |
Topic
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 02:40 | 328 | -5 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 07:56 | 333 | -3 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:34 | 336 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 15:59 | 337 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:03 | 338 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:11 | 338 | first reading |
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 22 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
39 reactions across 5 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 28 | 71.8% | |
| ⚡ | 5 | 12.8% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 7.69% | |
| 🍾 | 2 | 5.13% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 2.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 39 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 22 January 2026 to 31 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
ПРОМТ 업로드한 인물 얼굴은 실제 그대로 유지하고, AI 미남/미녀 느낌 말고 "진짜 KBO 생중계 카메라에 우연히 잡힌 일반인 관중" 처럼 자연스럽게 생성. SPOTVKBO 방송 캡처 느낌, 관중석 직캠 구도, 주변 관중•맥주컵•응원도구•선풍기 자연스럽게 배치. 중요: 얼굴 과보정 금지 눈 키우기 금지 턱 보정 금지 피부 뽀샤시 금지 화보 느낌 금지 인플루언서 느낌 금지 실제 방송처럼: 약간 흐린 생중계 화질, 압축 노이즈, 미세한 모션블러, 현실적인 피부결, 잔머리와 땀광 표현. 다리 꼬고 편하게 경기 보는 모습, 카메라 의식한 듯 안 한 듯한 자연스러운 핵심은: "AI가 만든 사람"이 아니라 "진짜 방송에 잡혀 화제된 일반인 같은 현실감.
Что-то я совсем запустила канал, выгорела 🫠 Сейчас еще актуальна тема Промтов?
Делаем?
- Да29%
- Не, отшумело0%
- Конечно!86%
The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Fashion editorial portrait of a woman with the facial features of the reference girl, exact face resemblance, photorealistic. Wearing an oversized red blazer over a black top and black trousers, identical styling. Sitting on a stool, confident relaxed pose. Background made of vintage newspaper pages with floating red heart balloons. Clean flawless makeup, red lips, soft waves hair. Cinematic studio lighting, shallow …
❤🔥5🔥1
Делитесь реакциями ❤️🔥 Editorial fashion photo of a woman with the appearance of the reference girl. Wearing a black bodysuit, combat boots, striped socks, sunglasses. Sitting on the floor in a white studio surrounded by red heart balloons. Relaxed sexy pose, confident body language. Clean studio light, fashion Valentine aesthetic, high realism.
❤🔥7⚡1👍1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤🔥5
Ultra-realistic Y2K high-fashion editorial. Camera shoots THROUGH a large red paper keyhole cut-out filling the foreground; matte red edges dominate and slightly blur at borders, creating strong depth. Inside the opening: woman centered against a smooth pastel-pink studio background. She wears a strapless structured red corset and an ultra-mini sculptural rosette skirt; white lace tights with visible floral texture. …
❤🔥3🔥2⚡1
Как вам такое? Ставьте реакцию ❤️🔥
❤🔥8⚡3🍾2
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @promt_rimma_brylik. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Делаем?
- Да29%
- Не, отшумело0%
- Конечно!86%
The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 22 January 2026 to 31 May 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“"AI Промты" rimma_brylik” (@promt_rimma_brylik), 328 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/promt_rimma_brylik.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.