Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Promptin✨

Channel

Promptin✨

@promptin_shiva

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

908subscribers

+69 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003011506261
TypeChannel
Username@promptin_shiva
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/promptin_shiva

Growth

839908873.513 August 2026 — 839 subscribers14 August 2026 — 844 subscribers22 August 2026 — 884 subscribers28 August 2026 — 908 subscribers13 August 202628 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 14 days, net +69. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 829–918 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 08:55908+24
22 Aug 2026, 09:48884+40
14 Aug 2026, 18:38844+5
13 Aug 2026, 21:33839first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.6%
avg views ÷ 908 subscribers
Avg views / post
169
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.86%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held18 (7 August 202611 August 2026)
Views total3,042
Reactions total87
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 21:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

87 reactions across 18 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5057.5%
❤‍🔥1921.8%
🔥78.05%
🥰66.90%
😍55.75%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 87 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 18:23 UTC119 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Create an ultra-photorealistic 8K monochrome portrait based strictly on the reference photo. Preserve the subject’s face and body 100% identically to the reference—exact facial structure, eyes, nose, lips, hairstyle, skin tone/texture, expression, body shape, proportions, and weight. Do not beautify, reshape, slim, enlarge, or alter any features. Male subject in a three-quarter profile, with his head tilted strongly

4

Signed Shiva

11 Aug 2026, 18:23 UTC118 views5 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

5

Signed Shiva

11 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC114 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Create an ultra-realistic, hyper-realistic 8K portrait based strictly on the reference image. Preserve the face and body 100% identically to the reference—no changes to facial structure, eyes, nose, lips, hairstyle, skin tone, expression, body shape, proportions, or weight. The man is slightly bent forward with eyes closed and gaze lowered, shoulders still and slightly slumped, conveying deep introspection, sadness,

4

Signed Shiva

11 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC110 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

4

Signed Shiva

8 Aug 2026, 10:45 UTC210 views3 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Create an ultra-photorealistic, hyper-realistic 8K image based strictly on the uploaded reference photo. IDENTITY PRESERVATION — HIGHEST PRIORITY: Keep the face, identity, facial features, hairstyle, skin tone, body shape, weight, proportions, and anatomy exactly as in the reference. Do not beautify, reshape, slim, enlarge, or modify the face or body in any way. An adult woman standing in a strict 90° side profile, m

❤‍🔥3

Signed Shiva

8 Aug 2026, 10:45 UTC183 views7 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥7

Signed Shiva

8 Aug 2026, 10:32 UTC180 views3 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Create a hyper-realistic 8K editorial photograph based strictly on the reference image. IDENTITY LOCK: Keep the woman’s face and body 100% identical to the reference. Preserve exact facial structure, eyes, nose, lips, eyebrows, hairstyle, skin tone, facial expression, body shape, proportions, and weight. Do not slim, enlarge, reshape, beautify, or modify her appearance in any way. She is standing in a subtle three-qu

❤‍🔥3

Signed Shiva

8 Aug 2026, 10:32 UTC159 views6 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥6

Signed Shiva

7 Aug 2026, 09:45 UTC204 views5 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Hyperrealistic 8K photograph, face 100% identical to reference photo — no alteration in facial features, face shape, eyes, nose, mouth, hairstyle, hair color, skin tone, expression, body shape, limb size, or proportions. Extreme close-up of a woman with a gentle smile, candid mid-laugh moment, gaze directed off-frame to the right. Head in near three-quarter (3/4) angle. Hair loose, wavy, wind-blown, scattered natura

5

Signed Shiva

7 Aug 2026, 09:45 UTC188 views6 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🥰6

Signed Shiva

7 Aug 2026, 09:44 UTC181 views3 reactionsread 13 August 2026

A dramatic, medium-shot portrait of a {argument name="subject" default="woman with dark hair styled in a messy updo"}, loose strands framing her face. She is captured in profile, looking back over her shoulder with a thoughtful expression. She wears a {argument name="clothing" default="textured mustard-yellow button-down shirt"}, and the {argument name="lighting" default="warm side-lighting"} highlights her features

3

Signed Shiva

7 Aug 2026, 09:44 UTC169 views7 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥7

Signed Shiva

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @promptin_shiva. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,511,519 of 1,629,535 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Promptin✨” (@promptin_shiva), 908 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/promptin_shiva.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.