Грузим с Seeedance 2 сетку персонажа, как её сделать описывал тут https://t.me/prompt_info/125 Для завершающего кадра я так же загрузил еще одно фото, со своим логином в соц сетях, если вам не нужен никакой логин, то ничего не загружайте, и удалите из промпта строку с таймингом 00:10-00:13 Генерировать можно 👉 ТУТ Промпт такой: Главный персонаж @Image 2 . Пропорции тела карикатурно искажены на протяжении всего вид…

Channel
🍌Промпты ИИ|Promts AI
@prompt_info
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
327subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002899116493 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @prompt_info |
| Created | Between 1 July 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/prompt_info |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:18 | 327 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:29 | 327 | first reading |
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 10 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 25.1%
- avg views ÷ 327 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 82.0
- 2 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 2.83%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 2
- of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 2 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (10 April 2026 – 2 August 2026) |
| Views total | 164 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 07:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 38
- Videos
- 71
- Links
- 8
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 2m 18s
- Average length
- 14s
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
48 reactions across 11 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 21 | 43.8% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 16.7% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 14.6% | |
| 🤣 | 4 | 8.33% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 4.17% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 4.17% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 4.17% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 2.08% | |
| 🗿 | 1 | 2.08% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 10 April 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Грузим с Seeedance 2 сетку персонажа, как её сделать описыват тут https://t.me/prompt_info/125 Для завершающего кадра я так же загрузил еще одно фото, со своим логином в соц сетях, если вам не нужен никакой логин, то ничего не загружайте, и удалите из промпта строку с таймингом 00:13-00:15 Генерировать можно тут Syntxaibot Промпт Главный герой — референс персонажа @image1. Это центральный персонаж видео. Персонаж …
👍3
В seedance 2.0 загружаем референс фото, и желательно не просто фото, а сетку персонажа, сделанную как описано ТУТ, пишем промпт: @Image изображает главного персонажа видеоролика. В финальном кадре персонаж стоит в золотистом ржаном поле под ясным голубым небом, в руках у персонажа раскидистый, густой сноп пшеницы. Персонаж бережно прижимает его к себе одной рукой. При движении отдельные колоски слегка покачиваются. …
👍4
Photo, posted without a caption
Несмотря на небольшие несостыковки в сведении, не идеальный звук и тд и тп но слушать можно 😅
Загружаем в seedance 2 свой референс, выбираем длительность 15 секунд и качество 480 для экономии. Пишем промпт Кинематографичное, гипердетализированное 15-секундное видео боди-хоррор трансформации (Transformation sequence) премиального качества. Снято на профессиональную анаморфную линзу 35мм, стиль съемки сочетает реализм и мрачную фантастику (в духе фильмов Кроненберга). Аудиовизуальная атмосфера: первые секунды…
👍3
Загружаем свое фото как референс, идем в Seedance 2 и вставляем промпт. Выставляем длительность видео 10 секунд, для экономии кредитов достаточно качества 480 A 10-second continuous cinematic video showcasing a surreal hybrid creature perched firmly on a thick, textured, moss-covered tree branch in a sun-drenched summer forest. The creature has the brilliant, vibrant cyan-blue and black feathered body of an exotic b…
🤝2🔥1🤣1
Загружаем своё фото в seedance 2 как референс, выбираем длительность 10 секунд и пишем промпт A 10-second continuous under-water video featuring a surreal, chubby hybrid creature swimming inside a beautifully lit aquarium. The creature has a perfectly round, inflated pufferfish body, seamlessly merged with the head of the man from the reference photo, sporting a traditional topknot hairstyle. Curiously, the creature…
😁5🤣2
Добавляем себя или кого угодно в мультик. Для начала я взял с гугла кадр фото1, и загрузил его в gpt написав такой промпт Не меняя персонажей и стиля картинки, сделай из неё картинку в формате 9:16 На выходе я получил фото2 Затем я загрузил в seedance 2 это фото и сетку себя, как делать сетку, писал выше. Промт для видео такой: Создай законченный 15 секундный ролик. @[кадр мультика или фильма] — этот кадр ст…
👍5❤1😁1
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Грузим сетку персонажа в Seedance 2, можно так же загрузить и указать пачку ролтон🙂 Пишем такой промпт Кинематографичное, гипердетализированное 15-секундное видео трансформации mecha suit-up премиального качества. Снято на профессиональную анаморфную линзу 35мм с глубоким размытием заднего плана (bokeh). Персонаж @ваш_референс находится на пустой автомобильно стоянке перед супермаркетом. (0:00-0:03) Крупный план, …
🔥5🤣1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @prompt_info. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@prompt_info named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🍌Промпты ИИ|Promts AI” (@prompt_info), 327 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prompt_info.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.