Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Projeto Fezinha FREE - tetheustips

Channel

Projeto Fezinha FREE - tetheustips

@projetofezinha

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,127subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003892321628
TypeChannel
Username@projetofezinha
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/projetofezinha

Growth

1,1231,1281,125.57 August 2026 — 1,128 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,128 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,126 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,123 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,127 subscribers1,1277 August 202616 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 9 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,122–1,129 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 17:381,127+4
13 Aug 2026, 05:171,123-3
10 Aug 2026, 14:591,126-2
7 Aug 2026, 23:481,128no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:121,128first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.2%
avg views ÷ 1,127 subscribers
Avg views / post
227
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.96%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (2 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total4,319
Reactions total133
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

133 reactions across 11 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍7052.6%
👎3224.1%
75.26%
😐75.26%
👏64.51%
💩32.26%
🌭21.50%
🖕21.50%
🥰21.50%
🔥10.752%
🕊10.752%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 133reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 23:17 UTC69 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🏆 COPA 2% 24 tipster, só 1 vencedor 👀 https://t.me/Torneiocopa2

💩3🖕21🔥1

Signed мατнєυs

7 Aug 2026, 11:12 UTC159 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🟠 BETANO 🗓 Bilhete para 07/08/2026 ■ TRIPLA (C x C / W x W / M x L) □ Odd 8.62: 0.50u Odd mínima: 8.00

👍8👏3🕊1

Signed мατнєυs

5 Aug 2026, 23:02 UTC243 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

⚡️ Projeto Fezinha FREE 🗓 05/08/2026 📝 3 Bilhetes ✅ 0 Green ❌ 3 Red 💰 -0,65u 🟰 Mês: -1,15u

👍3👏3

Signed мατнєυs

5 Aug 2026, 16:25 UTC227 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Pegaram? (TRIPLA)

  1. Sim58%
  2. Não21%
  3. Preguiça de fazer manualmente21%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed мατнєυs

5 Aug 2026, 16:24 UTC236 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Pegaram? (QUINA)

  1. Sim70%
  2. Não13%
  3. Preguiça de fazer manualmente17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed мατнєυs

5 Aug 2026, 16:24 UTC218 viewsread 7 August 2026

Vão tentando fazer manualmente e votem (vou deixar 30 minutos de enquete dessa vez)

Signed мατнєυs

5 Aug 2026, 16:22 UTC219 viewsread 7 August 2026

Aparentemente a Betnacional tem essa frescura com Bilhetes grandes, de o link direto não funcionar... 🫠

Signed мατнєυs

5 Aug 2026, 16:19 UTC175 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⚪️ BETNACIONAL 🗓 Bilhete para 05/08/2026 ■ DUPLA (C x C / S x S) □ Odd 14.63: 0.25u Odd mínima: 13.40

👍171👎1

Signed мατнєυs

5 Aug 2026, 16:18 UTC202 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⚪️ BETNACIONAL 🗓 Bilhete para 05/08/2026 ■ TRIPLA (F x K / H x L / S x C) □ Odd 11.86: 0.25u Odd mínima: 11.20

👍14👎51

Signed мατнєυs

5 Aug 2026, 16:17 UTC227 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

⚪️ BETNACIONAL 🗓 Bilhete para 05/08/2026 ■ QUINA (C x C / S x S / S x C / H x L / F x K) □ Odd 173.47: 0.15u Odd mínima: 155.00

👍16👎6

Signed мατнєυs

5 Aug 2026, 16:16 UTC202 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

⚠️ BETS: BETNACIONAL Falei que não ia abandonar vcs... Aparentemente os links estão bugando. Caso não funcionar, tenta manual que passa

3🥰2

Signed мατнєυs

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @projetofezinha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

5 Aug 2026, 16:25 UTCFinal Results24 voters

Pegaram? (TRIPLA)

  1. Sim58%
  2. Não21%
  3. Preguiça de fazer manualmente21%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Aug 2026, 16:24 UTCFinal Results23 voters

Pegaram? (QUINA)

  1. Sim70%
  2. Não13%
  3. Preguiça de fazer manualmente17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4 Aug 2026, 12:06 UTCFinal Results11 voters

Pegaram?

  1. Sim45%
  2. Não27%
  3. Não tenho conta27%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Aug 2026, 16:20 UTCFinal Results28 voters

Pegaram?

  1. Sim39%
  2. Não61%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Projeto Fezinha FREE - tetheustips” (@projetofezinha), 1,127 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/projetofezinha.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.