Пока лидирует AEO: как попасть в ответы ChatGPT и Perplexity. А говорите не интересно про эти ваши попадания в выдачу нейронок.
😁1

Channel
@proitru
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
897subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001049749849 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @proitru |
| Created | 21 March 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/proitru |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:34 | 897 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:18 | 898 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:10 | 898 | +1 |
| 5 Aug 2026, 23:08 | 897 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (25 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,447 |
| Reactions total | 52 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 14:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
52 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 13 | 25.0% | |
| ❤🔥 | 11 | 21.2% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 19.2% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 15.4% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 5.77% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 3.85% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 3.85% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 3.85% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 1.92% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 52reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Пока лидирует AEO: как попасть в ответы ChatGPT и Perplexity. А говорите не интересно про эти ваши попадания в выдачу нейронок.
😁1
Хочу выкладывать отдельные скиллы в опенсорс
The shares total 201%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❤🔥1👍1
Наговорить бессвязно — рабочий приём, а не лень Андрей Карпатый, который в 2026 перешёл в Anthropic в команду претрейна, описал приём из собственной практики. Когда модели не хватает контекста, а печатать лень, он переключается на голосовой ввод и минут десять говорит потоком сознания — без структуры, как выйдет. Смысл не в экономии времени: модели неплохо собирают связное из бессвязного, и пересказ ваших путаных мы…
❤🔥1
«Ядро» ИИ в медиа ICT.Moscow изучил 4,7 тысячи публикаций об ИИ в русскоязычных медиа, чтобы выяснить, из каких составных частей складывается «ядро» темы, и какая связь прослеживается с другими технологиями Что обнаружили: - большинство инфоповодов об ИИ ориентированы на массового читателя и лишены технологических деталей; - более трети публикаций явно затрагивают хотя бы одну тему внутри ИИ. Чаще всего — модели …
👍1
Будет ласковый дождь
🔥4❤🔥3😭2
Интернет, который мы потеряли
❤🔥3😁2🤯1
Ваши скиллы возможно написаны под модель, которой уже нет Anthropic удалила больше 80% системного промпта из Claude Code, и качество на их тестах не упало. Пересказывать статью не буду, интереснее, что из этого следует, если вы сами пишете агентов и скиллы. 1. Половина ваших правил — заплатки на провалы прошлых версий. «Не начинай с общих фраз», «не используй конструкцию X» — вы это добавляли, потому что модель так…
👍1🔥1🤯1
Смотрим на отчёт Similarweb «2026 Generative AI Landscape». Сначала общие выводы: 1️⃣ Первое, что стоит заметить, — это разрыв между двумя метриками роста. Визиты выросли на 70% до 9,5 млрд, а уникальные посетители — только на 57%, до 655 млн. Аудитория расширяется медленнее, чем растёт частота обращений: приходят не столько новые люди, сколько одни и те же, но чаще. ИИ перешёл из режима «попробовать» в режим привыч…
🔥3👍1
С праздником, сисадмины! Свитеры под горло, огромные очки, бороды и длинные волосы стали модными и перестали быть отличительной чертой профессии. Но "вы пробовали выключить и снова включить" будет вечным. Всем пива!
👍3❤🔥2🔥1
Все обновление госуслуг уже скачали?
😁2🔥1🤬1
Модель OpenAI сбежала из песочницы и взломала Hugging Face Что произошло — по материалу The Verge и официальному разбору самой OpenAI: OpenAI тестировала кибер-способности двух моделей — GPT-5.6 Sol и ещё не вышедшей, более мощной — на бенчмарке ExploitGym. В изолированной среде без доступа в интернет. Задача: показать, насколько хорошо модели умеют взламывать. Не найдя ответа внутри песочницы, модели нашли и проэ…
👍1
Что произошло с ценой на ИИ Миллион слов у лучшей модели Anthropic стоит 50 долларов, у DeepSeek — 87 центов. TNW собрал материал со ссылками на WSJ и Fortune, и заголовки везде про одно: китайские модели дешевле, американским лабам плохо, IPO под угрозой. Это правда, но это не самое интересное в новости. Интереснее то, как именно компании начали экономить. Год назад знаком жечь токены было доказательством серьёзно…
❤🔥1🤯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @proitru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Хочу выкладывать отдельные скиллы в опенсорс
The shares total 201%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Инженер Контекста” (@proitru), 897 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/proitru.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.