Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Инженер Контекста

@proitru

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

897subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001049749849
TypeChannel
Username@proitru
Created21 March 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/proitru

Growth

897898897.55 August 2026 — 897 subscribers6 August 2026 — 898 subscribers6 August 2026 — 898 subscribers12 August 2026 — 897 subscribers5 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 897–898 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 17:34897-1
6 Aug 2026, 14:18898no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:10898+1
5 Aug 2026, 23:08897first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.1%
avg views ÷ 897 subscribers
Avg views / post
90.4
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.59%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held18 (25 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,447
Reactions total52
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 14:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

52 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁1325.0%
❤‍🔥1121.2%
🔥1019.2%
👍815.4%
🤯35.77%
23.85%
😭23.85%
🙏23.85%
🤬11.92%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 52reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 10:49 UTC31 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Пока лидирует AEO: как попасть в ответы ChatGPT и Perplexity. А говорите не интересно про эти ваши попадания в выдачу нейронок.

😁1

5 Aug 2026, 18:29 UTC59 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Poll

Хочу выкладывать отдельные скиллы в опенсорс

  1. AEO: как попасть в ответы ChatGPT и Perplexity. Аудит цитируемости и переработка текста75%
  2. VISTA: какие темы брать в работу. Взвешенный скоринг по 5 критериям13%
  3. Сторителлинг для B2B-текстов. Как превратить фичу в бизнес-нарратив: дуга из 6 шагов, 4 фреймворка50%
  4. Фактчек техконтента. Проверка цифр, версий и атрибуций за 3 итерации50%
  5. Скелеты лонгрида. 5 готовых каркасов H2/H3 по интенту читателя13%

The shares total 201%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

❤‍🔥1👍1

5 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC60 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Наговорить бессвязно — рабочий приём, а не лень Андрей Карпатый, который в 2026 перешёл в Anthropic в команду претрейна, описал приём из собственной практики. Когда модели не хватает контекста, а печатать лень, он переключается на голосовой ввод и минут десять говорит потоком сознания — без структуры, как выйдет. Смысл не в экономии времени: модели неплохо собирают связное из бессвязного, и пересказ ваших путаных мы

❤‍🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 13:47 UTC51 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @technome_mePhoto

«Ядро» ИИ в медиа ICT.Moscow изучил 4,7 тысячи публикаций об ИИ в русскоязычных медиа, чтобы выяснить, из каких составных частей складывается «ядро» темы, и какая связь прослеживается с другими технологиями Что обнаружили: - большинство инфоповодов об ИИ ориентированы на массового читателя и лишены технологических деталей; - более трети публикаций явно затрагивают хотя бы одну тему внутри ИИ. Чаще всего — модели

👍1

5 Aug 2026, 07:35 UTC72 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Будет ласковый дождь

🔥4❤‍🔥3😭2

4 Aug 2026, 18:18 UTC79 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Интернет, который мы потеряли

❤‍🔥3😁2🤯1

4 Aug 2026, 17:59 UTC85 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Ваши скиллы возможно написаны под модель, которой уже нет Anthropic удалила больше 80% системного промпта из Claude Code, и качество на их тестах не упало. Пересказывать статью не буду, интереснее, что из этого следует, если вы сами пишете агентов и скиллы. 1. Половина ваших правил — заплатки на провалы прошлых версий. «Не начинай с общих фраз», «не используй конструкцию X» — вы это добавляли, потому что модель так

👍1🔥1🤯1

3 Aug 2026, 12:19 UTC73 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Смотрим на отчёт Similarweb «2026 Generative AI Landscape». Сначала общие выводы: 1️⃣ Первое, что стоит заметить, — это разрыв между двумя метриками роста. Визиты выросли на 70% до 9,5 млрд, а уникальные посетители — только на 57%, до 655 млн. Аудитория расширяется медленнее, чем растёт частота обращений: приходят не столько новые люди, сколько одни и те же, но чаще. ИИ перешёл из режима «попробовать» в режим привыч

🔥3👍1

31 Jul 2026, 09:43 UTC99 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

С праздником, сисадмины! Свитеры под горло, огромные очки, бороды и длинные волосы стали модными и перестали быть отличительной чертой профессии. Но "вы пробовали выключить и снова включить" будет вечным. Всем пива!

👍3❤‍🔥2🔥1

29 Jul 2026, 14:11 UTC153 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Все обновление госуслуг уже скачали?

😁2🔥1🤬1

29 Jul 2026, 13:18 UTC108 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Модель OpenAI сбежала из песочницы и взломала Hugging Face Что произошло — по материалу The Verge и официальному разбору самой OpenAI: OpenAI тестировала кибер-способности двух моделей — GPT-5.6 Sol и ещё не вышедшей, более мощной — на бенчмарке ExploitGym. В изолированной среде без доступа в интернет. Задача: показать, насколько хорошо модели умеют взламывать. Не найдя ответа внутри песочницы, модели нашли и проэ

👍1

27 Jul 2026, 16:50 UTC106 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Что произошло с ценой на ИИ Миллион слов у лучшей модели Anthropic стоит 50 долларов, у DeepSeek — 87 центов. TNW собрал материал со ссылками на WSJ и Fortune, и заголовки везде про одно: китайские модели дешевле, американским лабам плохо, IPO под угрозой. Это правда, но это не самое интересное в новости. Интереснее то, как именно компании начали экономить. Год назад знаком жечь токены было доказательством серьёзно

❤‍🔥1🤯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @proitru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

5 Aug 2026, 18:29 UTCAnonymous Poll8 voters

Хочу выкладывать отдельные скиллы в опенсорс

  1. AEO: как попасть в ответы ChatGPT и Perplexity. Аудит цитируемости и переработка текста75%
  2. VISTA: какие темы брать в работу. Взвешенный скоринг по 5 критериям13%
  3. Сторителлинг для B2B-текстов. Как превратить фичу в бизнес-нарратив: дуга из 6 шагов, 4 фреймворка50%
  4. Фактчек техконтента. Проверка цифр, версий и атрибуций за 3 итерации50%
  5. Скелеты лонгрида. 5 готовых каркасов H2/H3 по интенту читателя13%

The shares total 201%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Инженер Контекста” (@proitru), 897 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/proitru.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.