Channel
@progrev_u_prodagi
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
311subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001689221904 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @progrev_u_prodagi |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/progrev_u_prodagi |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 11:16 | 311 | -3 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 14:44 | 314 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 15:47 | 315 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:28 | 317 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:33 | 318 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:41 | 318 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 10 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
23 reactions across 9 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 10 | 43.5% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 43.5% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 13.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 10 May 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Как вести блог и не сливаться. Часть1 Пока все спорят, нужен блог или нет, многие забывают задать себе один вопрос: а откуда к вам уже приходят клиенты? Соцсети - это не волшебная кнопка. Если у вас уже работает сарафанное радио, сначала научитесь усиливать его, а уже потом переживайте из-за Reels. Вот три способа. Акция “Приведи друга”. Не просто “приведи и получи скидку”. Сделайте предложение, которое действит…
Один опрос в 3-х соц сетях И везде разные интересы В инсте - преобладает контент, поэтому тяжело не слиться В Телеграмме- как заработать (реальные паЦаны) В ВК - слава богу что хоть кто то нажал ))) хотя просмотры там в последнее время стали больше
🔥1
Какие темы вас интересуют
The shares total 125%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Как сделать , чтобы люди вас узнавали и запоминали?
Заставить меня встать в 4:00 может только поезд Санкт-Петербург-Волгоград Потому что доча приехала 😍
❤2
Делюсь выводами встречи с доктором Котовым Вдруг для кого то будет полезным Кому лень слушать на х2 : 1. Задавайте чаще себе вопрос, который начинается с слова ЧТО! и не КАК 2. У всех есть драматичный опыт, надо его отбросить и жить дальше, абстрагироваться. Вставьте реакцию или выпишите в комментариях полезно вам или нет
❤4
Я вчера посетила бизнес-сообщество только из-за лекции Доктора Котова И ниже мои инсайты ⬇️
🔥1
Пора снова начать вести свой канал Что думаете?
👍3
Выступила с темой: как начать брать деньги даже с родственников, и не испытывать чувство вины! На встрече с бьюти мастерами Ну и провела практику по смыслам!
🔥4❤1
Как успеть провести встречу клуба и через 30 минут быть в Волжском в качестве спикера 😁 Боже храни @rayagunko она меня сегодня просто спасла 🙏
🔥2
Небольшое реалити на 90 дней 😁 Сегодня день первый «Ничего не откладываю на потом» Стоматолог Зубы для меня показатель любви к себе, заботы о себе! Люди без Зубов, для меня, это люди, которым нельзя доверять Это прям РЭД ФЛАГ! Я с детства сама ходила к школьному врачу, без анастезии, лечила кариес! Всегда подходила к маме и говорила- мама посмотри, есть черное? Мама смотрела и говорила - есть, иди лечи! И я сама …
🔥2
Как мы провели майские праздники Ну во первых на ВБ можно заказывать не только трусишки, но и саженцы смородины, цветы и даже тяпки 🤣, да я купила 2 шт, но пока сняла обзор на одну! (покупки в 40+) А во вторых, дай бог терпения моему мужу))) потому что у меня грандиозные планы, а он про них не знает 🤣🤣🤣
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @progrev_u_prodagi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какие темы вас интересуют
The shares total 125%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 10 May 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Монетизация личности Бренд. Деньги. Система. с Натальей Братчиковой” (@progrev_u_prodagi), 311 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/progrev_u_prodagi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.