Channel
@progresivie
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry
162subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001409312205 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @progresivie |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 November 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/progresivie |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 22:23 | 162 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:18 | 163 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:17 | 164 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:06 | 164 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 23 May 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 November 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
172 reactions across 15 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 85 | 49.4% | |
| 👍 | 55 | 32.0% | |
| 🔥 | 17 | 9.88% | |
| 👎 | 4 | 2.33% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 1.74% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 1.16% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 1.16% | |
| 🤬 | 2 | 1.16% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.581% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.581% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 172 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 23 May 2022 to 4 November 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Noklausies un noskaties tiešraidi par 4. novembra Saeimas darba aktualitātēm kopā ar Andri Šuvajevu! Facebook: https://fb.watch/gAJLZ8h1IL/ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/progresivie/live
👍3
Šodienas, 25. oktobra, tiešraidē par valdības sarunām kopā ar Andri Šuvajevu skaidrojam – kā Progresīvie uzzināja par 3+1 piedāvājumu no medijiem un kāpēc atteicāmies, lai nepieviltu vēlētāju uzticību Saeimā veidot zaļu, sociāldemokrātisku un progresīvu politiku. Noskaties visu ierakstu (sākums no 2. minūtes 44. sekundes): https://www.facebook.com/Progresivie.LV/videos/5413020505474215/ vai noskaties divus īsākus iz…
❤5👍3👏2
Kaspars Briškens: Jau no paša sākuma teicām, ka esam gatavi iesaistīties koalīcijā tikai kā pilnvērtīgs partneris. Mums pašmērķis nav konkrēti amati, bet iespējas, lai cīnītos par konkurētspējīgāku, iekļaujošāku, sociāli atbildīgāku Latviju. https://zinas.tv3.lv/latvija/velesanas/briskens-atteikt-jv-piedavajumam-progresivajiem-bijis-pascienas-un-demokratiskas-vienlidzibas-jautajums
👍6🔥3
Komentējot Jaunās Vienotības lēmumu turpināt koalīcijas izveides sarunas trīs partiju lokā, Progresīvie apliecina gatavību strādāt 14. Saeimas opozīcijā. “Jau no pirmajām valdības veidošanas sarunām mūsu uzstādījums ir bijis nemainīgs – pilnvērtīgi koalīcijas partneri, vai pilnvērtīgs darbs opozīcijā. Mēs esam uzturējuši prasības, kas koalīcijā ļautu mums pilnvērtīgi pārstāvēt vēlētāju uzticību un Progresīvie zaļo, …
❤8👍5😁1
🤝 Skaidrīte Ābrama: JV un Progresīvajiem bija saturīga saruna par ilgtspējīgas ekonomikas, t. sk. ražojošās bioekonomikas, vides un klimata jautājumiem. Apspriežot šīs koalīcijas veicamos darbus, neiezīmējās citu partiju pieminētās "ideoloģiskās domstarpības", kuras it kā traucētu strādāt valsts labā. https://www.tvnet.lv/7631917/progresivajiem-un-jv-abpuseja-sapratne-energetikas-un-zalas-ekonomikas-jautajumos-akcen…
❤6🤔2
Uzzini vairāk: https://zinas.tv3.lv/latvija/politika/briskens-jv-viena-pati-netiks-gala-tapec-esam-gatavi-turpinat-sarunas-par-cetru-partiju-koaliciju/
👍5❤1😁1
Kaspars Briškens: Kāpēc partijas nestāv rindā pēc Labklājības ministrijas un Veselības ministrijas? Kāpēc Nacionālā apvienība izvairās no sarunas ar Progresīvajiem? 🤔
🔥12👍2❤1😁1
🤝 Kaspars Briškens: Daļa no demokrātijas ir arī sarunas kultūra. Izvairīšanās no sarunas un savstarpējo ideju apmaiņas par valstiski steidzamākajiem uzdevumiem partijai PROGRESĪVIE rada nopietnas bažas par NA un AS patiesajiem motīviem koalīcijas veidošanā. Kopīgu sarunu rezultātā būtu jāatrod labākos risinājumus valstij, vienlaikus pārstāvot pēc iespējas plašāku sabiedrības loku. https://www.delfi.lv/delfi/sabiedrib…
👍12🔥1
Noklausies nelielu ieskatu valdības veidošanas sarunās – 17. oktobra ziņojums kopā ar Andri Šuvajevu! Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PROGRESIVIE/videos/425056896474989/ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/p/Cj0SwPFIdY0/
❤7👍3
Turpinām ziņot par koalīcijas veidošanas aizkulisēm no Progresīvo skatpunkta! Tiekamies ap plkst. 16:00 Facebook un Instagram tiešraidē: 👉 https://facebook.com/PROGRESIVIE 👉 https://instagram.com/progresivie/
❤4👍2
💪 Partija PROGRESĪVIE ir uzsvērusi, ka tā potenciālajā četru partiju koalīcijā ienestu arī papildu sabiedrības grupu, kura tiktu pārstāvēta parlamentā – jaunieši, cilvēki ar īpašām vajadzībām, jaunuzņēmumu un arodbiedrību, vidusslāņa pārstāvji. https://www.apollo.lv/7626283/progresivie-saruna-ar-apvienoto-sarakstu-parrunajusi-partijas-iespejamo-pienesumu-valstij-krizes-apstaklos
❤10👍3🥰1
❤️💚 Kaspars Briškens pateicas mūsu daudzajiem atbalstītājiem un aicina – neapstājies pie balss tikai reizi četros gados! 💪 Dalība politiskā partijā ir iespēja pašam vai pašai sniegt pienesumu un ietekmēt politiskos procesus, lai veidotu taisnīgāku, spēcīgāku, konkurētspējīgāku un iekļaujošāku Latviju: https://www.progresivie.lv/veido-politiku-pasu-rokam/
❤13👍1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @progresivie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
| Label | The Progressives |
|---|---|
| Description | political party in Latvia |
| X / Twitter | @Progresivie |
| Official site | https://www.progresivie.lv/ |
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Progresīvas vēstis” (@progresivie), 162 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/progresivie.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.